Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt!


Beiträge: 98
Zugriffe: 28.691 / Heute: 13
Silverado Gold Mi. kein aktueller Kurs verfügbar
 
Solarparc:

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt!

11
27.08.06 19:20
Nach dem Solarboom kommt wohl bald der nächste Boom:

KOHLEVERFLÜSSIGUNG --> ÖLGEWINNUNG

Es gibt eine Methode, aus billiger & niederwertiger Kohle
Öl, Diesel und Gas zu produzieren. Die Umwandlung basiert
auf einem jahrzehnte alten Prozess, lohnte sich bisher aber
nicht, da der Ölpreis zu niedrig war.

Seit dem Ölboom überlegen China, USA und Europa, das
Kohleverflüssigungsverfahren einzuführen! Es gibt noch
Millarden von Tonnen niederwertiger Braunkohle, die
genutzt werden könnte, um Öl zu produzieren. Dieses
könnte noch mindestens 20 Jahre reichen! Die Ölkrise
wäre damit so gut wie erledigt ;-)

Nun ein interessantes Unternehmen, das genau über DIESE
Technik verfügt: GREEN FUEL

Green Fuel ist ein 100%iges Tochterunternehmen von Silverado Gold.
Der Chef, Anselmo, war bereits bei einer Anhörung vor dem Amerikanischen
Kongress. Bis September wird mit "exciting news" gerechnet!

"We continue our busy 2006 year and look forward to increasing our production and discovery into 2007 and beyond. Our gold mining operation is now focusing primarily on completing gold recovery, and we continue to move forward with our LRCWFuel project. Most of the 'behind-the-scenes' work with government authorities has been completed on the fuel project, and we anticipate a very exciting announcement either in August or September,' concluded Mr. Anselmo."

Sollte Green Fuel vom Amerikanischen Staat finanzielle Unterstützung
für den Bau einer Kohleverflüssigungs-Anlage erhalten, könnte der
Kurs explodieren! Sollten die Nachrichten negativ sein, bleibt Silverado
Gold immerhin noch das Goldabbaugebiet in Alaska ;-)
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 53896
Antworten

Werbung

Entdecke die beliebtesten ETFs von Xtrackers

Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +66,61%
Xtrackers Spain UCITS ETF 1D
Perf. 12M: +47,23%
Xtrackers Spain UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +47,10%
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +46,92%
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C
Perf. 12M: +45,17%

Solarparc:

Infos und Charttechnik

 
27.08.06 19:34
Kohleverflüssigung - Alternative zu Öl ?
05.08.06

Zur Zeit redet und diskutiert alles über das Thema Öl, wo geht der Preis hin, wie stark wird die Nachfrage, vorrangig aus den USA und China, steigen und vor allem: wie lange werden die Reserven reichen ?

Zunehmend macht sich die Kohle als „Gegenpart“ zum Öl auf den Weg. Inzwischen sehen Merrill Lynch, BHP Billiton oder auch die International Coal Group. diesen fossilen Rohstoff Zukunftträchtiger als Öl. Ein offensichtlich simpler Grund führt zu dieser Einschätzung. Die Kohle reicht noch, wenn das Öl schon alle ist. Allein in den USA liegen Kohlereserven, die nach heutigem Stand, 200 Jahre reichen. Kein Energieträger, von Nordamerika bis nach China, sei so billig und in so großer Menge verfügbar, sagt Richard Price, Investmentbanker bei Westminster Securities in St. Louis und ehemaliger Vice President des größten US-Kohleproduzenten Peabody Energy, so Die Welt vom vergangenen Mittwoch.

Neben den USA sind in China die größten Kohlelagerstätten zu finden. Laut chinesischen Angaben belaufen sich diese auf über 1.000 Mrd. Tonnen.
Bereits Mitte Juni hatte Robin Batchelor in einem Interview mit der FAZ auf die Kohleverflüssigung verwiesen. Batchelor verwaltet u. a. den MLIIF World Energy Fund. In dem Gespräch verwies er darauf, dass er nun in Unternehmen investiert, die Kohle verflüssigen und dann Treibstoff herstellen. Keine neue Technik, aber erst ab einem Ölpreis von 35 Dollar je Fass rechnen sich diese Verfahren. Der Markt ist noch klein, doch das Potential gewaltig, so Batchelor.

Laut anderen Quellen rentiert sich die Kohleverflüssigung ab einem Ölpreis von etwa 40 USD pro Barrel. Dieser Preis ist nun schon seit 2 Jahren überschritten und wird wahrscheinlich auch nicht mehr erreicht werden, wobei dieses Risiko nie zur Gänze ausgeschlossen werden kann. Der Durchschnittspreis tendiert inzwischen bei 68 USD pro Barrel und macht damit die Kohleverflüssigung attraktiv. Das führte bereits dazu, dass die Tonne Kohle im März mit etwa 67 USD ein 10 Monatehoch erreicht hatte. Die jährliche Bedarfssteigerung wird bei 3 % geschätzt und damit doppelt so hoch wie bei Öl. Innerhalb der nächsten 10 bis 15 Jahre sollte sich der Kohlepreis mindestens verdoppeln, darin sind sich die drei o. g. einig.

Der Gesamtverband des deutschen Steinkohlebergbaus schrieb in einem Artikel zu Energierohstoffen:  „Kaum jemand spricht heute hierzulande noch von der Kohleverflüssigung und Kohlevergasung“. Warum auch ? Die Programme wurden durch den Ölpreisverfall Mitte der 80iger Jahre durch die damalige Bundesregierung eingestampft. So ist die letzte Pilotanlage zur Kohleverflüssigung, die von der Deutschen Montan Technologie (DMT) seit den 70er Jahren im Technikumsmaßstab betrieben wurde (Produktionsleistung rund 200 kg/Tag), vor zwei Jahren, ähnlich wie die Kokerei Kaiserstuhl, hier abgebaut und nach China verkauft worden. Dort betreibt man bereits intensivste Forschungen und entwickelt immer neue Technologien zur Kohleverflüssigung.
Große Raffinierer wie Sinopec ziehen derzeit in diesem Bereich ein Projekt nach dem anderen auf. Hier beabsichtigt Chinas größter Bergbaukonzern, die Shenhua Group einzusteigen. Diese wiederum plant, auch mit Hilfe deutscher Experten, im mongolischen Majata den Bau einer Kohleverflüssigungsanlage, die jährlich aus rund 9,7 Mio. Tonnen Kohle rund 5 Mio. Tonnen Benzin, Kerosin, Diesel u. a. herstellen und im nächsten Jahr in Betrieb gehen soll. Sie basiert auf der Deutschen Montan Technologie. Die chinesische Regierung hält diese weltweit erste Industrieanlage zur direkten Kohlehydrierung mit einem Investitionvolumen von fast 3 Mrd. USD für bedeutsam im Rahmen der inländischen Energiestruktur.

Die China Oil News berichtete Anfang Februar, dass die Regierung plant, in den nächsten fünf bis zehn Jahren 15 Milliarden USD in den Bau von Anlagen zu investieren, mit denen jährlich 16 Mio. Tonnen Ölprodukte aus Kohle gewonnen werden können. Die Anlagen sollen in den kohlereichen Provinzen Shanxi, Shaanxi und Yunnan sowie der autonomen Region Innere Mongolei entstehen.

Nach den derzeitigen und in der Perspektive weiter steigenden Preisen für Öl- und Mineralölprodukte auf dem Weltmarkt, würde sich die Kohleverflüssigung nicht nur in China und Südafrika rentieren. Die Nachfrage nach Kohle wird entsprechend steigen, dass stellte der  Gesamtverband des deutschen Steinkohlebergbaus fest.
Ein großer dieser Branche und vor allem mit langjähriger Erfahrung ist die Sasol (ursprünglich South African Synthetic Oil Ltd). Zu diesem Unternehmen erfahren sie demnächst mehr in unserer Analyse.
www.emfis.com/
Quelle: EMFIS.COM, Autor: (il)

Und jetzt schaut sich ein Chartanalyst mal den Kurvenverlauf an:
Der Chartabschnitt in den roten Kästchen ähnelt sich sehr!
Zwischen 2001 und 2002 gab es bereits eine ähnliche Formation
wie aktuell! Nur diesmal scheint es eine GRÖßERE SACHE zu werden...
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 53898
Antworten
neuling83:

solarparc hast du vielleicht die

 
27.08.06 21:09
WKN nummer???? Den ich finde sie nicht  
Antworten
stefan64:

ich habe immer Bauchschmerzen

 
27.08.06 21:30
wenn irgendwelche "Minibuden" sich offensichtlich schlagartig auf Bereiche stürzen bzw. Aktivitäten entwicklen die überhauptnichts miteinander zu tun haben bzw. nichts mit dem was sie bisher gemachte haben, außer, daß diese Bereiche gerade "in" sind - so wie hier Goldförderungen und Kohleverflüssigung

Es geht nicht ohne fundiertes Know-How bei dem was man macht, egal was man macht. Nur große Reden schwingen und schöne Pläne machen reicht nicht für den Erfolg.

ich wünsche euch viel Erfolg, trotzdem kommen von mir nur skeptische Grüße

Stefan64
Antworten
franzl1:

WKN: 867737, ISIN: CA8279062076

 
28.08.06 06:57
Us Kürzel: SLGLF

Homepage: www.silverado.com/

mfg

Antworten
Solarparc:

The Future of Federal Coal

 
28.08.06 08:49

SILVERADO, PEABODY ENERGY, HEADWATERS, RENTEK & WMPI TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS


WASHINGTON, D.C. – MONDAY, MAY 8 - 2006
SILVERADO - OTCBB: SLGLF / Frankfurt : SLGL / Berlin : SLGL

 

Garry Anselmo, CEO of Silverado Green Fuel Inc., testified Thursday, May 4, 2006 before a crowded House committee hearing on behalf of Silverado Green Fuel’s Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel (LRCWFuel) Project. This important hearing took place in the ornate Resources Committee room, where portraits of past Resource Committee chairmen looked down upon the assembly.

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 2756011

Chairman Jim Gibbons of Nevada opened the hearing by welcoming those who were invited to testify. He commented that Congress is extremely serious about supporting efforts to encourage new technologies designed to bring alternative sources of fuel derived from coal to the market place in as short a time as possible. Following his opening statement, Chairman Gibbons then introduced the first panel, which was comprised of government - affiliated witnesses. 

Although representing different interests within the government, all members of this panel agreed with President Bush’s recent statement that America was addicted to oil, and that needed to change. They also acknowledged that America’s coal reserves are larger than the world’s oil or gas reserves. 

A major focus during the question and answer portion following the first panel’s presentations was the cost of imported oil, and what would be the projected cost of alternative fuel derived from America’s coal. Milt Copulos, President of the National Defense Council Foundation presented startling information as to the true cost of a gallon of gas, based upon what he referred to as “externalities” - or external costs that are not reflected in the price of an item. The Council has conducted extensive studies which divide these “externalities” into three categories: direct and indirect economic costs, oil supply disruption, and military expenditures. After analyzing these costs, the Council concluded that the “true” cost of a gallon of gas is currently an astounding $9.53.  He stated that, although these hidden costs are not seen at the gas pump, they create an enormous drain on America’s economy.

Copulos concluded by stating that coal is the answer to this tremendous economic problem, and referred to America as the “Saudi Arabia of coal.” He cited countries around the world that currently produce synthetic fuel from coal. He also reminded those at the hearing that the idea of using domestic coal to produce synthetic motor fuels is not new, referring to a 1942 House Committee hearing on the potential to produce gasoline, rubber and other products from coal, and a Senate hearing that same year on the production of synthetic liquid fuels from coal.

Following a brief break to allow the first panel to exit, the second panel was sworn in.

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 2756011

This panel was comprised of industry leaders in coal-to-liquids technology, and included Mr. Anselmo. Mr. Anselmo, the final witness, presented the Silverado Green Fuel technology as different than that of his four colleagues testifying before the committee, in that the Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel process is the only one that uses high-moisture content (low-rank) coal. The other companies represented on the panel use a technology in which bituminous coal is the feed-stock used to produce synthesis gas.

During his testimony, Anselmo pointed out that roughly one half of the coal reserves in the United States are relatively inexpensive sub-bituminous or lignite. He informed the committee that Low-Rank Coal researchers around the world have spent the past 40 years investigating virtually every coal drying technology conceived. In his testimony, he stated:

 “Of all the low-rank coal-drying technologies assessed, hydrothermal treatment is the only process that produces a liquid fuel with the inherent benefits of liquid handling, transportation, and storage. This treatment is an advanced technology that features a process of moderate temperature and pressure and non-evaporative drying that irreversibly removes much of the moisture from low rank coal.  Low Rank Coal Water Fuel – or LRCWFuel, is a non-hazardous, easily transportable liquid fuel.”

Anselmo also cited a research project supported by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Alaska Science and Technology Foundation where test quantities of LRCWFuel were produced from Alaska’s Beluga coal in a pilot plant and burned in a test boiler.  According to the results of that study, the Beluga LRCWFuel proved to be an excellent fuel with extremely low emissions.

Following the testimony from the second panel, the Chairman began his round of questioning by asking Mr. Anselmo about the price of LRCWFuel. Anselmo told him that the price of a barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) of LRCWFuel varies between $10 and $15 depending on the source of the coal.  Anselmo went on to state, regarding energy price comparisons, “We are talking about the difference between $10 or $15 LRCWFuel as opposed to the current market price of $70 for a barrel of oil.”  The committee recognized the tremendous economic advantage that LRCWFuel (at $15 per BOE) would provide as a low-cost, high-quality feedstock for gasification and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Thus, LRCWFuel would serve as an ideal candidate in that process for downstream production into ultra-clean synthetic gasoline, jet and diesel fuels.  Commercialization of Silverado’s hydrothermal treatment process is an outstanding opportunity to make America energy self-sufficient, especially since half of America’s coal reserves are considered to be “low-rank.”

Anselmo obviously enjoyed appearing before the committee as evidenced by the light-hearted moments between he and Chairman Gibbons during the question and answer period.

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 2756011

Chairman Gibbons concluded the hearing by thanking all who testified on this matter of vital importance to the nation.  He acknowledged that Congress must and will take decisive action in support of the development of America’s coal, and that this hearing would initiate that process.

Following dismissal of the panel, Mr. Anselmo remained for several minutes, speaking with Congressional staff and other interested parties who attended the hearing.  He was congratulated on his testimony by the senior committee staff members, and publicly thanked them for inviting him to testify before Congress:

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 2756011

Anselmo being congratulated by Senior Committee Staff Members

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 2756011

“I am deeply grateful for the interest these Members of Congress have shown by asking me to come before them to tell them about Silverado Green Fuel’s Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel process. I was especially encouraged by the focus both panels of witnesses had on domestic energy security and providing the United States military with an alternative, secure source of fuel with which to operate.  We have been working for the past few years on educating the public and government officials about LRCWFuel. I believe our invitation to testify before this committee is in itself a testimony to the great success we have had over the last two years in that education process. After witnessing the genuine enthusiasm for our coal-to-liquid fuel by Congressmen and their aides, I am even more excited about our project and the momentum we have created.”

Anselmo concluded his remarks by stating, “On another matter, we are in the final preparations stage prior to signing the Memorandum of Understanding for our commercial demonstration and research facility. I believe we will be able to make a joint announcement in the very near future regarding the construction of America’s first Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel Production Facility.”

To learn more about Silverado Green Fuel Inc., visit us online at http://www.silverado.com or contact Bob Dynes, Investor relations, toll free at 1-800-665-4646.

SILVERADO GREEN FUEL INC.
(800) 665-4646 or (604) 689-1535 · F: (604) 682-3519 ·pr@silverado.com·www.silverado.com
P.O. Box 83730 · Fairbanks, Alaska. · 99708 · USA

http://www.silverado.com/may082006/
Antworten
Solarparc:

Silverado: 2 in 1

 
28.08.06 08:55
Silverado kann nicht nur von seinem Green Fuel Projekt
enorm profitieren, sondern auch von seinen Gold Projekten.
Ende Mai meldete Silverado: SILVERADO DOUBLES NOLAN GOLD PROJECT HOLDINGS
www.silverado.com/pressroom.htm

Ich hoffe, dass Green Fuel erfolgreich
wird und ich hoffe noch mehr, dass der
Goldabbau im Winter diesen Jahres noch
erfolgreicher wird ;-) Der September
wird es zeigen! Wer ist schon dabei?
Antworten
3181olly:

@ Solarparc

2
28.08.06 09:02
Erstmal schönen guten Morgen.

Ja, ich bin seit geraumer Zeit schon dabei bez.bin seiner Zeit bei fast Tiefstkursen eingestiegen.
Es steht für mich auserfrage, adss dieser Wert eine "goldene Zukunft" hat.




Penguin
Antworten
Solarparc:

@3181olly

 
28.08.06 09:06
Finde ich schön ;-) Denke auch, dass
wir kurz vor einem entscheidenden Punkt
im Leben von Silverado stehen. In einigen
Tagen kann sich herausstellen, dass Silverado
mehr ist, als nur ein Goldunternehmen. Vielleicht
ist die Tochter Green Fuel die Lösung für Amerikas Ölproblem :-)

Nicht mehr lange und wir wissen es ;-)
Antworten
franzl1:

Möchte mich, Eurer optimistischen Einstellung,

 
28.08.06 09:47
anschließen!
Danke Solarparc, für Deine Eingaben.
Bin selber "Long" investiert, da der Wert viel (Kurs-) Phantasie beinhaltet und dieses an der Börse nicht unerheblich sei.

Hierbei handelt es sich nicht um eine Kaufempfehlung.
Jeder handelt auf eigenes Risiko.

mfg
Antworten
Solarparc:

Genau!

 
28.08.06 10:42

Das Risiko ist schon nicht gering bei Silverado,

die Chancen sind aber auch nicht schlecht ;-)

Der Kurs ist im Moment ziemlich weit unten. Die Fantasie der nächsten Monate ist wohl noch nicht im Kurs enthalten. Silverado hat anscheinend genug Cash (7 Mio) für die nächsten big Investitionen und wie es aussieht, wurde SLGLF in den letzten Wochen durch Short Seller nach unten gedrückt.

SLGLF: Short Interest UP 4287.8% to 267.6K in Aug 2006

THURSDAY , AUGUST 24, 2006 05:25 PM

According to new short interest data from OTCBB.com, short interest for Silverado Gold Mines Ltd (OTCBB: SLGLF) INCREASED 4287.8% to 267,569 shares for the month ended mid-August, 2006.

SYMBOL              JULY          AUGUST          CHANGE       %CHANGE  DAYS/COVER--------   -------------   -------------   -------------  ------------  ----------SLGLF              6,098         267,569        +261,471     +4287.82%           1

Based on SLGLF's 20-day average daily share volume of 2,051,480, it would require approximately 1 day(s) of buying to cover this short interest.

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/Info_Center.asp (unter Knobias Headlines)

Die Chancen für einen Rebound sind also nicht schlecht, oder? ;-)

Antworten
Solarparc:

Die Shorties müssen covern

 
28.08.06 10:46
Die Shorties müssen covern!
Ziel ist für sie ein Kurs von 0,050 Dollar!
Wenn sie diesen Kurs nicht erreichen, dann
wird es teuer für sie! -Und gut für uns ;-)

Also hoffen wir, dass es ihnen nicht gelingt,
den Kurs unter die 0,06 Dollar-Marke zu drücken!
Würde der Kurs diese Woche steigen, müsste einige
Shorties zu höheren Preisen covern, als sie wollten!
Dann würde der Kurs automatisch explodieren!

Dann noch ein paar gute News von SLGLF und wir stehen
wohl ruckzuck wieder bei 0,150 Dollar (+150%)!
Antworten
3181olly:

@ Solarparc

 
28.08.06 10:50
Um das Baby noch ein wenig mehr auf trab zu bekommen,
habe ich noch mal eine kleine "Posi" dazu gekauft.

Meinetwegen kann es jetzt losgehen.
Lass uns den ersten Schritt gehen :-))))


Penguin
Antworten
Solarparc:

Zur Kohleverflüssigung...

 
28.08.06 12:43
...gibt es im Netz genügend Infos. Z.B. hier:

gw.eduhi.at/thema/energie/kohle/kohle.htm

zeus.zeit.de/text/archiv/2001/42/200142_weltoel.xml

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohleverfl%C3%BCssigung

www.news-report.de/nachricht/Wirtschaft/...wieder_aktuell.html

www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/.../bericht-23032.html

www.presseportal.de/story.htx?nr=725998&firmaid=54802

www.vdi-nachrichten.com/vdi_nachrichten/...brik&cat=2&id=22339

www.gvst.de/dokumente/fakten/Argumente18_kohleoel.pdf

www.umweltlexikon-online.de/fp/archiv/RUBenergie/...erfluessigung.php

Speziell zu Silverado und Green Fuel gibt´s hier Infos:

www.wallstreet-online.de/aktien/14256.html

ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/...rd=BB%3ASLGLF&origsymbols=slglf

ariva.de/quote/profile.m?secu=41202



Antworten
Solarparc:

Kaum Umsatz heute

 
28.08.06 17:53
Heute werden in USA kaum SLGLF´s gehandelt.
Sehr geringer Umsatz. Der Kurs steht immer
noch bei nur 0,062 Dollar! Das sollte sich
diese Woche hoffentlich noch ändern ;-)

17:14:40  0,0620 1600
17:13:20  0,0620 2500
16:16:39  0,0610 1000
16:16:10  0,0610 100000
16:12:06  0,0610 20000
16:00:10  0,0610 5000
15:50:13  0,0610 25000
15:49:22  0,0610 5000
15:49:15  0,0610 25000
15:37:35  0,0610 500
15:35:19  0,0610 10000
15:31:28  0,0700 5500
15:30:26  0,0610 40000
15:30:23  0,0610 0
15:30:23  0,0610 18000
Antworten
Solarparc:

Silverados Green Fuel Combustion

 
30.08.06 18:30
Hydrothermal Treatment and Silverado's Green Fuel Preparation

Over the last 40 years researchers around the world have investigated virtually every subbituminous coal (SBC) drying technology ever proposed. Of all the SBC drying technologies assessed, the most promising is hydrothermal treatment (HT), sometimes called hot water drying. HT is particularly effective for producing Silverado’s  concentrated Green Fuel suitable for many liquid fuel applications. Production of Silverado’s Green Fuel with its inherent environmental, transportation and utilization benefits also eliminates the stability problems that have plagued all other SBC drying processes designed to produce a dried SBC that can be safely handled and transported.

HT is an advanced technology, featuring moderate temperature/pressure, non-evaporative drying, which irreversibly removes much of the inherent moisture from SBC. HT upgrading allows fuels derived from SBC to be produced with solids content rivaling those obtained from bituminous coal-water fuels without the uses of costly additives. Silverado’s Green Fuel is a non-hazardous, non-toxic, easily transportable quasi-liquid fuel that avoids all the stability problems of dust generation and spontaneous combustion associated with SBC.  

Silverado’s Green Fuel is produced by treating a slurry of pulverized SBC at moderate temperatures, up to 300oC, and the corresponding saturated steam pressure in water, hence the name hydrothermal treatment. HT is similar in many respects to pressure cooking, and the Green Fuel retains all of the desirable combustion characteristics of SBC. Sufficient residence time at reaction conditions is provided in a laminar-flow reactor to ensure that the interior of the largest particle reaches the desired temperature. Upon heating, some water expands out of the coal due to differences in thermal expansion between coal and water. Loosely bound carboxyl groups on SBCs are also released as CO2, expelling additional water from the coal. Some volatile matter, waxy materials in the SBCs, being hydrophobic (water hating), are retained in the micro-pores of the SBC in the pressurized aqueous environment, giving a unique uniform wax distribution, which seals most of the micro-pores and minimizes water re-absorption. By retaining most of the volatile matter, the high reactivity SBC, as well as most of the energy value, is preserved.

Figure 1 is an artist's rendition of what occurs during HT. Following HT, the system pressure is reduced and excess water is removed, leaving Silverado’s Green Fuel. The excess water is reused in the continued production of our Green Fuel.

Even after HT, SBCs retain some of their oxygen functionality and are still somewhat hydrophilic, or water loving. Therefore, they have a much lower tendency than their bituminous coal-water fuel counterparts to settle rapidly. Some SBC produced fuels have shown almost no settling tendencies even when stored for months. For SBC produced fuels that do settle over time, the tendency is to produce a soft pack suspension that can be re-suspended by stirring. As opposed to some of their bituminous counterparts, no SBC produced fuels created to date, regardless of particle size distribution, have shown any tendency towards dilatent (tending to solidify), shear thickening, behavior. Consequently, the higher the shearing force applied, the lower the viscosity, which accounts for their ease of atomization. Therefore, generally no costly stability enhancing or viscosity reducing additives are used with SBC produced fuel. Instead, stirring and/or agitation are used to maintain a constant feed in storage and feed tanks. Typically the only additive recommended for Silverado’s Green Fuel is a biocide to prevent biological growth in fuel that is to be stored for some period of time before use.

The technical feasibility of HWD has been demonstrated in pilot plants in Australia, Japan, and the US. These pilot plants have operated for thousands of hours with SBCs from around the world. As a general rule, the increases in energy content or density for SBC produced fuels versus coal water slurries prepared from untreated coals are around 30% for subbituminous coals, about 50% for lignites, and well over 100% for brown coals, peat, and biomass. What remains to be done for commercialization is production and end-use testing in a demonstration-scale facility to establish commercial production costs, establish derating values in an oil-designed boiler, and to produce thousand tonne quantities of Silverado’s Green Fuel  for potential end-users to test in their own facilities or independent laboratories.

Silverado’s Green Fuel Combustion

Since most of the SBCs volatile matter is retained in the coal particle in the form of waxy material, the high reactivity and rapid carbon burnout of subbituminous coals, in comparison to bituminous coals, is maintained. In addition, SBCs, even after HT remain non-agglomerating, Figure 2. In all reported combustion tests fuels produced from SBC burned significantly better than bituminous coal-water fuels (CWFs). Fuels produced from SBC ignited more rapidly and gave higher carbon burn out, typically over 99%, when compared with commercial bituminous CWFs. Tests in the Allison coal-fired turbine, using a fuel produced from subbituminous coal from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming, demonstrated the superiority of fuels produced from SBCs over a commercial bituminous CWF. The best carbon burnout obtained with the micronized bituminous coal-water fuel under optimum operating conditions was slightly over 97%, whereas the fuel produced from SBC, which had an average particle diameter three times larger, gave carbon burnout of over 99%, under all operating conditions, Figure

During HT, alkali cations (positively charged ions) associated with the coal particles are released and dissolved in the water. Alkalis, particularly sodium, are the principal cause of severe boiler tube fouling. With their removal as part of the HT process, fuels produced from SBCs are inherently less fouling than their parent raw coal, and in some cases reduce the fouling to levels considered allowable in industry for high sodium coals that have little market value without hydrothermal treatment.  

Test quantities of fuels derived from SBCs were produced from Alaska's Beluga coal, following HT and tested in a combustion test facility. The Beluga fuel produced from SBC proved to be an excellent fuel with less than 4% ash and only 0.07% sulfur. It had a low fuel ratio (ratio of fixed carbon to volatile matter), with a volatile matter content close to the level of the raw Beluga coal. Carbon burnout was excellent at over 99.8%. Gaseous emissions were monitored during the test and indicated a very low level of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the flue gas. Ash deposition was minimal, consisting of a fine white powder easily removed by normal soot blowing operations.  

Advanced applications in boilers designed for oil, combustion turbines, and/or diesel engines have placed new demands on the fuel's combustion characteristics due to greatly shortened residence times allowable for combustion. In these cases, the inherent higher reactivity of LRC versus bituminous CWF, makes them a superior fuel.

For more information click to: www.silverado.com/fuelprocess.htm
Antworten
Solarparc:

Update Stockguru

 
31.08.06 16:55
Stockguru.com: Price and Volume Alerts for Thursday, August 31, 2006 - Featuring Wits Basin Precious Minerals, IVMD , TrackPower, Superior Oil and Gas and More

THURSDAY , AUGUST 31, 2006 08:42 AM

Dallas, Texas, Aug 31, 2006 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- StockGuru Pre-Market Updates for Thursday include Wits Basin Precious Minerals Inc., (OTCBB:WITM), IVMD Inc, (OTCBB:IVME), TrackPower, Inc. (OTCBB:TPWR), Superior Oil and Gas Company (OTCBB: SIOR),Silverado Gold Mines ( OTCBB: SLGLF) , and TriMedia Entertainment Group Inc. (OTCBB: TMEG). StockGuru Pre-Market Updates feature companies with significant moves in either volume or price in the past two trading sessions. In our update we analyze recent news about the companies featured and detail the movement in the stock.

Silverado Gold Mines ( OTCBB: SLGLF) - Wednesday's shares closed down 1.64% with a price of $0.06. The volume was at 2,904,533. Gold recovery and processing operations at the Nolan Gold Mine, located North of Fairbanks, Alaska are nearing completion. To date over $1,000,000 of large jewelry grade gold and collector's nuggets have been recovered and polished for sale. These nuggets are among the finest the area has yielded. In addition to the jewelry grade gold mentioned above, Silverado is currently making preparation to extract the 3/16" and smaller gold from concentrates. Once this gold is extracted, the company will polish it to further enhance its value. While this extra treatment requires more work than smelting, the value of the end product is 20% higher than the untreated gold.

We continue our busy 2006 year and look forward to increasing our production and discovery into 2007 and beyond. Our gold mining operation is now focusing primarily on completing gold recovery, and we continue to move forward with our LRCWFuel project. Most of the 'behind-the-scenes' work with government authorities has been completed on the fuel project, and we anticipate a very exciting announcement either in August or September," concluded Mr. Anselmo.

For a quote and the latest news on this company, please visit: www.stockguru.com/profiles/SLGLF.php .

Quelle: www.otcbb.com

Symbol SLGLF eingeben

Klicke auf Knobias Headlines (oben rechts)
Antworten
Solarparc:

USA zieht an!

 
31.08.06 18:31
Hoppala! Wir steigen!  :-)Last:0.063 SLGLF - SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTDChange:% Change: % High:0.063 Low:0.0584 Volume:1,036,741www.pcquote.com/stocks/quote.php?symbol=slglf
Antworten
Solarparc:

In der Kohle liegt die Kraft!

 
01.09.06 09:33
Coal May Surpass Oil as Better Bet on Demand for Cheaper Fuel

July 31 (Bloomberg) - Coal, the hard, black byproduct of fossilized plants used as fuel since China's Western Han dynasty 2000 years ago, may overtake oil as the best performing energy investment.

That, at least, is the emerging consensus from a diversity of speculators, investors and giant corporations including Wilbur Ross, the billionaire bankruptcy specialist, BHP Billiton Plc, the world's largest mining company, and Merrill Lynch & Co., the third-largest U.S. securities firm.

Because ``coal is the cheapest, most abundant energy source,'' from North America to China, ``the surge in oil has encouraged people to plan new coal-fueled power plants and to start using conversion technologies such as coal-to-diesel,'' said Richard Price, an investment banker at Westminster Securities in St. Louis.

Coal is poised to top its recent highs because of record oil and natural-gas prices, said Francisco Blanch, chief commodity analyst at Merrill Lynch & Co. in London. In Europe, coal was $62.55 a ton last week and reached a 10-month high of $66.83 in March, broker ICAP said. Prices paid by U.S. utilities will climb 5 percent in the next year and double by 2021, said Price, a former vice president at Peabody Energy Corp., the largest U.S. coal producer.

Converting coal into liquid fuel or natural gas becomes economical when oil remains above $40 a barrel, said Stephen Leer, chief executive officer of Arch Coal Inc., the second- largest U.S. producer.

Oil more than doubled since January 2004, reaching a record $78.40 a barrel on July 14 and averaging $68 in New York this year. It hasn't traded below $40 since June 2004 and will fall 19 percent next year to $60, according to the median forecast of 19 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

Coal Turnaround
Ross, the 68-year-old chairman of International Coal Group Inc., is convinced the search for a cheaper alternative to oil and natural gas will enable coal to outperform oil. ``We certainly bet on that,'' Ross said in a telephone interview from Paris.

- 3 - ``The argument against it is not an economic one,'' he said. ``It's about the environment and emissions.'' Ross, who was worth about $1 billion last year, according to Forbes magazine, made much of his fortune transforming troubled companies into money makers. He founded Ashland, Kentucky-based International Coal in 2004 after acquiring mines from bankrupt producers.

Coal in the U.S. is forecast by analysts to recover from a drop this year caused mainly by a mild winter. Prices in Wyoming's Powder River Basin, the largest U.S. producing region, have fallen from a record $21.50 a ton at the end of last year to $11.50, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, while the eastern coal benchmark has declined 15 percent to $49 a ton.

Acquiring Reserves
For the U.S. and China, the world's biggest energy users, coal offers the chance of reducing their reliance on Middle East oil that has tripled in cost since 2002. The U.S. has enough coal to last almost two centuries and today imports two-thirds of the oil it uses.

Coal producers are acquiring reserves after the U.S. government estimated demand will increase by 3 percent a year, almost twice the rate for oil. St. Louis-based Peabody Energy on July 5 offered A$1.83 billion ($1.4 billion) for Excel Coal Ltd., Australia's third-biggest coal producer.

``A lot of the future energy requirements globally will have to be satisfied by coal,'' said Michael Schroder, head of resources at Old Mutual Asset Management in Cape Town, which manages the equivalent of $55 billion, including shares in mining companies BHP Billiton and Anglo American Plc. ``Coal seems to be on the agenda of lots of countries.''

Coal-to-Liquids
Using more coal is part of President George W. Bush's initiative to make the U.S. less dependent on imports. U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in May authorized the Air Force, which burned 3.2 billion gallons of jet fuel last year, all refined from crude oil, to begin testing 100,000 gallons of a similar fuel derived from natural gas and coal.

Peabody Energy says it needs government-backed loans to build coal-to-liquids plants near its deposits in Montana and Illinois. The plants may cost as much as $4 billion apiece, said Arch Coal's Leer.

South Africa's Sasol Ltd., which developed coal-to-liquids technology to reduce the nation's reliance on oil, has won the endorsement of the airline industry for a jet fuel mix half derived from coal, and has sought approval for a 100 percent coal-based variety. The technology has helped turn Sasol into Africa's most profitable company and biggest by market value.

Energy Independence
Illinois, Indiana, Montana, Alabama, Colorado, Wyoming and Pennsylvania provided incentives and tax breaks to encourage construction of almost two dozen coal plants to use more local reserves. The plants use technology that reduces pollution.

``The U.S. seems set on working toward energy independence and coal is by far the most
economical option,'' said John Piccard, a senior analyst at Jersey City,
New Jersey-based Lord

- 4 -
Abbett & Co., which holds a 2.3 percent stake in coal producer Massey Energy Co. ``Once the infrastructure for conversion gets built, coal will become an alternative to oil.''
China, which has tripled oil imports in the last five years, has enough coal for a hundred years.

Royal Dutch Shell Group Plc, Europe's second-largest oil company, and Sasol are investing in plants in China with domestic coal companies.
Power plants also may boost their use of coal. The U.S. will build plants that increase coal's share of fuel used to generate electricity to 57 percent from 50 percent today, the U.S. Energy Department said.

Undervalued Coal
Investors value coal reserves at a fraction of oil deposits. Peabody Energy's reserves are worth 7 cents per million British thermal units, a measure of energy content, based on the company's market capitalization. At today's share price, Exxon Mobil Corp.'s oil deposits are worth $3.16 a million British thermal units. That gap may narrow, raising the value of coal relative to oil, as more plants are built that allow coal to compete with oil, Piccard said.

Peabody Energy shares have risen 12 percent this year, while Exxon Mobil has gained 19 percent. Consol Energy Inc. shares have risen 17 percent. Arch Coal Inc. has fallen 13 percent, while Ross's International Coal has lost 32 percent.

``Too much of a discount is being paid for coal equities at the moment given their inherent energy value and long-term ability to provide growing returns,'' said Kevin Bambrough, who helps manage C$3.8 billion at Sprott Asset Management Inc. in Toronto. Coal producers over the next decade are more likely to generate ``superior returns over oil companies,'' he said.

Pirate Capital, Carl Icahn
Pirate Capital LLC, a Connecticut hedge fund headed by former Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
investment banker Tom Hudson, this month said it bought an $89 million stake in James River Coal Co., which has mines in Kentucky and Indiana. Pirate Capital is betting the shares will rebound from their 44 percent decline in 2006. Hudson didn't respond to calls seeking comment.

Billionaire financier Carl Icahn, 70, acquired a 2.7 percent stake in Pittsburgh-based Consol during the first quarter. Icahn couldn't be reached for comment. Global coal prices are likely to rise during the next year as consumers switch to coal from oil, Merrill's Blanch said in a July 17 interview.

``Coal demand continues to set records in the U.S. and globally,'' Greg Boyce, Peabody's chief executive offer, said July 21 after the company posted a 61 percent gain in second- quarter profit.

``The long-term estimate of global coal use continues to strengthen.''
The recent slump in coal has depressed shares of producers. The Bloomberg U.S. Coal Index of eight companies has fallen 34 percent since rising to a record of 810.55 on May 11.

``That kind of a meltdown creates a lot of buying opportunities,'' said James Rollyson, a coal analyst at Raymond James Financial Inc. in Houston. ``It's a short-term weakness because coal is the fuel of choice going forward.''
Antworten
LoggerBe:

Interessant

 
01.09.06 09:56
Sehr interessanter Beitrag, Solarparc. Habe demletzt auch viele Reportagen im Fernsehen zu diesem Thema gesehen und habe mich mal entschieden hier eine Long-Position aufzubauen.

Mal sehen wohin die Reise geht.
Antworten
Solarparc:

Bald wissen wir es ;-)

 
01.09.06 10:16
Bald werden wir wohl wissen,
ob Silverado mit Green Fuel
an dem Kohleboom teilhaben
wird oder nicht ;-)

Im September will Anselmo die BIG Nachricht verkünden!
Die Erwartungen steigen jeden Tag :-)

Wenn ja, dann gibt es wohl bald ein paar neue Millionäre ;-)
wenn nicht, dann hoffen wir auf gute Goldnews...
Antworten
Solarparc:

http://www.liquidcoal.com

 
01.09.06 10:25
Sehr interessante Seite:

www.liquidcoal.com

Klickt einfach auf "View Slide Show"

Hier werden die verschiedenen Prozesse der "coal-to-liquid"
Verfahren anschaulich erklärt! Interessant: Die Verfahren
wurden wirklich schon alle vor vielen Jahrzehnten entwickelt!
Sie scheinen also wirklich zu funktionieren, haben sich bisher
nur leider aus finanziellen Gründen noch nicht gelohnt! Durch
die Ölverknappung und den hohen Ölpreis dürfte sich das aber
geändert haben! Kohle könnte die Ölreserven für bis zu 100 Jahre sichern!

Vor allem Seite 13 dürfte für Silverado Aktionäre interessant sein ;-)
Antworten
Solarparc:

Da passt...

 
05.09.06 14:54
...dieser thread gut dazu
http://www.ariva.de/board/267997#bottom

:-)
Antworten
Solarparc:

USA braucht neue Energien

 
06.09.06 18:22
Bush wird zum Klimafreund  (06.09.2006)
Der US-Präsident will sein Land aus strategischen Gründen von ölfördernden Ländern unabhängig machen - und singt plötzlich das Loblied auf die Alternativen Energien.

Washington - Am Labor Day, dem im 19. Jahrhundert bewusst vom europäischen 1. Mai abgesetzten amerikanischen Tag der Arbeit, hat Präsident George W. Bush alternative Energien in den Mittelpunkt seiner Ansprache gerückt. Die Verringerung der Abhängigkeit von Ölförderstaaten, "die uns nicht mögen" - Bush nannte keine Namen - soll vor allem durch neue Technologien erreicht werden. Erwähnung fanden Brennstoffzellen, Biodiesel und die Kernkraft. Konkrete Vorhaben nannte der Präsident nicht. (..)
www.welt.de/data/2006/09/06/1024479.html

--> Zumindest gibt es in den USA schon mal eine Neuausrichtung, HIN zu neuen Energiequellen! Das gab´s bisher noch nie, weil die Ölindustrie in den USA zu viel Macht hat! Aber vielleicht positioniert sich ja auch die Ölindustrie an neuen Verfahren der Energiegewinnung. Einige Ölunternehmen haben bereits massiv in Solar- und Windkraft investiert. Wieso also nicht auch in Coal-to-Liquid Verfahren? Die Zukunft wird´s zeigen!

Antworten
Solarparc:

Was geht ab?

 
06.09.06 18:36
Sehr interessant! Peabody Energy und Rentech entwickeln bereits gemeinsam Pläne, um coal-to-liquid Kraftwerke zu bauen! Bin gespannt, was Silverado´s Green Fuel dazu sagt. Es könnte sein, dass Anselmo bezüglich Green Fuel bald "bad news" verkündet... Deshalb könnte Anselmo wohl dieses Goldgewinnerprogramm ins Leben gerufen haben, um allen Aktionären das Gold von Silverado wieder schmackhaft zu machen. Kundenbindung würde ich das nennen ;-) bzw. Ablenkung vom Öl und Fokusierung auf das Gold ;-) Raffiniert!

Im Moment sieht´s wohl eher danach aus, dass Greenfuel NOCH nicht so erfolgreich wird, wie wir uns das erhofft haben, ist aber nur so ein Gefühl ;-) Vielleicht irre ich mich ;-) Der Kurs ist aber schon ziemlich weit unten! Vielleicht reichen auch schon ein paar Goldnews aus, um den Kurs anzuheben ;-)

Bin gespannt auf die nächsten Tage! Vielleicht gibt´s schon diese oder nächste Woche Nachrichten von Anselmo...

Coal Technology (updated July 21, 2006 )

Coal-to-Liquids Project Financing - John Warzel, vice president government affairs at Syntoleum Corporation, recently told Coal Outlook that despite $2.7 million in loan guarantees that have been promised to promote coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT2005), his and some other CTL projects will use private financing. Mr. Warzel felt that operational delays in the loan guarantee program and some of the language in EPACT2005 puts limits on loan guarantees that make private financing a better alternative (Coal Outlook, July 17, pp 1, 12, 13). Even though loan guarantees are very helpful because CTL projects are new and untested in this country, some of the technologies companies are planning to use may not qualify for Federal loan guarantees. Oklahoma-based Syntroleum is contracted to deliver 100,000 gallons of synthesized liquid fuel for testing in U.S. military turbines. Warzel stated that success in endeavors like that will make it easier to fund CTL projects.

Sherry Tucker of Colorado-based Rentech Corporation noted that even though loan guarantees must be repaid, a major benefit is that having them makes it much easier to get financing for the remaining capital needed, and at better rates. Rentech is converting a natural gas-fed ammonia plant to a clean liquid fuels plant based on coal gasification. Ms Tucker said Rentech will move ahead whether or not it wins loan guarantees. Rentech also has projects in development that use natural gas to develop liquid fuels and other products in Colorado, Mississippi, and Wyoming (Coal Outlook, July 17, p 12; and Correction, July 24, p 6).

CTL Private initiative - An agreement between Peabody Energy and Rentech is seen by investment analysts as a positive advance toward developing the CTL industry in the United States. On July 18, the largest U.S. coal producer and Denver-based Rentech revealed their agreement jointly to develop two CTL projects to produce diesel and jet fuel. Because CTL technology is untested in the U.S. on a commercial scale, the companies will spend the next year on feasibility plans. According to Hunt Ramsbottom, Rentech president and CEO, fuels from CTL technology can be produced and finished for $36 to $42 per barrel (Coal Trader, July 24, pp 3-4). The CTL plants will be located near Peabody coal reserves in Montana and the Midwest.

www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/coalnews/coalmar.html


Auch DAS hier ist SEHR interessant!!!
www.futurepundit.com/archives/003569.html


Antworten
Solarparc:

Drei Punkte PRO Silverado

 
06.09.06 18:50
Also Green Fuel bietet vielleicht doch eine Alternative zu den bisherigen Versuchen der US-Regierung, Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) in Amerika zu etablieren.

Denn:

1. Green Fuel kann angeblich als einziges Unternehmen Low-Rank-Coal (niederwertige Kohle) für die Umwandlung von Kohle in Benzin & Diesel verwenden. Davon gibt es in den USA viel viel mehr, als die höherwertige Kohle!

2. Amerika fängt gerade erst an, das CTL-Verfahren im eigenen Land zu etablieren. Da könnten Anfangs auch mehrere Verfahren getestet und unterstützt werden.

3. Anselmo spricht beim LRCWFuel von $10 bis $15 pro barrel, während Rentech von  $36 to $42 per barrel spricht. Damit wäre Green Fuel erheblich billiger, wenn es denn stimmt!


--> Das sind schon drei Punkte FÜR Silverado! Was meint ihr?

 
Antworten
pomerol:

sehr interessant o. T.

 
06.09.06 18:52
Antworten
clemus:

Was mich brennend interessieren würde:

 
06.09.06 21:26
Wo steht eigentlich geschrieben dass die amerikanische Regierung nur einen der 'Angehörten' finanziell unterstützt? Wenn diese Verfahren doch alle so viel billiger als das 'normale' Öl sind und von der restlichen Welt unabhängig machen warum wird also nur ein Unternehmen gefördert.
Nach den Umsätzen gestern war ich jedenfalls froher Hoffnung dass es aufwärts geht. Heute ist leider einer der vielen enttäuschenden Tage der letzten Zeit...
Antworten
Solarparc:

Mir reicht´s

 
07.09.06 18:44
Also mir reicht´s mit der Bodenbildung bei 0,06
langsam ;-) Von mir aus kann der Kurs jetzt
mal richtig Richtung Norden gehen! 0,125
könnte das erste Ziel sein. Danach hoffentlich
0,25 bzw. 0,50! Wir wollen die 1000% sehen, oder?
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 55844
Antworten
TMTM:

Silverado

 
07.09.06 21:52
da gebe ich dir recht. Der Boden ist da,
erst 8 dann 12 und vielleicht langfristig auf 1 , danach wäre ales möglich....
TMTM
Antworten
Solarparc:

Ein Traum?

 
13.09.06 09:47
Aus einem anderen Forum:
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=32530

"I wonder how this will occur.I suppose as follows;

1. Some time in the next day or several weeks, Silverado will announce the coal to licquid government funded project; it will be ( THE FIRST ) of it's kind. No other coal to licquid project has been government funded, there have been tax , and other incentives, but no outright funding.

2. The publicity will be very big; as ( coincidently ) some politician will use this marraige between Silverado and the government to help promote his or her political career. The beauty of this is Silverado will announce ONCE; the politician will PERSONALLY announce HUNDREDS of times over the six to eight week campaign period, and print media and television media usually serve to support the campaign.
The publicity will be at no cost to Silverado and will create plenty of investing and raising of the share price.
The campaign trail will be fraught with how this project helps to unleash us from the terrorist, and makes us energy independent, and will go on to say how this is creating jobs, and taxes and bettering the community. Yes being with the government has it's residual advantges.

3. The share price will go straight up for a long and steady amount of time, the name Silverado will begin to be known. Next on the list will be the private investors, and the infusion of money to go commercial will be astronomical; as a matter of fact I believe there may even be a mechanism ( I only say this, having attended the congressional hearings, and all testifiers said, " private funding is guaranteed when the government gets on board. " )
that is already in effect that once the government blesses this project that the private funding may already be there, which could explain, as Derbinski points out , the high legal fees, it could be the source of multi pronged deals.
Common sense would dictate that this be more than likely. Why you ask, think about it, if they need approx. 20 million for the demo plant and the government will not short change them, ( as they would be wasting their own money, so that's out of the question ) and the low rank coal conversion is already proven technology, then clearly private money will be on board, why not set it up now they have had so much time as the govt. does move slowly and cautiously.

4. Most probably the mm's are ready to jump in with both feet as the price abuse on this stock for years has created a brutally low price. And of course during this time so many other indicator lights will go off signaling the technical guys that they will also jump in. And finally the naked shorts, a great asset with this stock, will start to crumble and will have to cover , thereby jettisoning this stock into orbit where it should be.

5. I will assume that in the mix Silverado will announce the great gold news.

6. Silverado stands strong now with 7 milion in the bank and the gold and fuel standing on the precipice.

good luck to all longs I will see you at 2 to three dollars."
Antworten
Solarparc:

LRCWF Kraftwerk

 
13.09.06 09:51
Aus einem anderen Forum:
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=32536

LRCWF plant

Looks like the plant is going to be located in Mississippi near the Mississippi State University. It seems to be the closest land grant university near lignite fields by the river which runs from north east Mississippi into Alabama. There is another one in Alabama that it could be but this is my choice. Partly because the president of the University, here is a clip of his bio.

Robert H. Foglesong is the 18th president of Mississippi State University, a land-grant university committed to excellence in learning, research, and service. His vision is for MSU to become the most respected land-grant school in the Southeast. As president, he is responsible for planning, budgeting, and execution for the largest university in the state of Mississippi. He is also the president and executive director of the Appalachian Leadership and Education Foundation, a nonprofit operating to identify our next generation of leaders in Appalachia and mentor/financially support their journey toward academic, leadership, and character excellence. He's a director of Massey Energy, one of the largest producers of coal in the nation, and a director of the Michael Baker Corp., an international energy and engineering firm. He also has been designated by President George W. Bush to co-chair the United States-Russia Joint Commission on POW/MIAs.

University Map location
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oktibbeha_County%2C_Mississippi

Mississippi State University
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_State_University

Lignite Coal: An energy plus for Mississippi
www.msfb.com/news/Farmcountry/nov02/Lignite%20Coal.html


North American Coal Corp

By scrolling down and clicking on the map you can see that the Red Hill mine is close to Mississippi State University, will have to get an exact distance.

www.nacco.com/sc_north-american-coal.html

Derb
Antworten
centy01:

@solarparc

 
13.09.06 09:59
hoffen wir mal das alle so optimistisch denken!!
hab letztens im focus einen artikel gelesen wonach südafrikanische fluggesellschaften wegen der hohen kerosinpreise schon zu 40% treibstoff zumischen der aus der kohleverflüssigung stammt.
das würde heißen das es ein konkurrenzfähiger ersatz ist, auch schon bei den jetzigen preisen.
mal schaun ob ich den fous noch finden, dann gibts ne genaue quellenangabe.
Antworten
Solarparc:

20 Mille für Green Fuel

 
14.09.06 10:43
Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel Business

In order to proceed with establishing the commercial viability of our low-rank coal-water fuel business, we are currently seeking financing from the U.S. Government and from private sources to achieve the full $20,000,000 funding for this project. There is no assurance that we will be awarded any grant or private funding or that we will be able to complete any additional sales of our equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund this component of our plan of operations.

www.baystreet.ca/quotedata/partners/...uotes.cfm?qm_page=90397
SLGLF eingeben, Fri, Jul 14, 2006 FILING Quarterly report filed by small businesses - Form 10QSB  
Seite 15

20 Mille sind doch nicht viel!!! Silverado hat Anfang des Jahres mal einfach so hoppladihopp 7 Millionen Dollar eingesammelt! Und der Kurs ist sogar gestiegen! Jetzt brauchen sie schlappe 20 Millionen für Green Fuel, ein Unternehmen, dass Amerika vor dem Ölkollaprs retten könnte ;-) Also echt!!! Ich hoffe stark, dass Anselmo das US-Ministerium überzeigt hat und in der Ölindustrie Investoren aufgetrieben hat, die ein paar Milliönchen locker machen! Immerhin könnte hier ein Milliardenprojekt starten! Also los ;-)

We continue our busy 2006 year and look forward to increasing our production and discovery into 2007 and beyond. Our gold mining operation is now focusing primarily on completing gold recovery, and we continue to move forward with our LRCWFuel project. Most of the 'behind-the-scenes' work with government authorities has been completed on the fuel project, and we anticipate a very exciting announcement either in August or September,' concluded Mr. Anselmo.

(Verkleinert auf 87%) vergrößern
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 56779
Antworten
Solarparc:

future coal-to-liquid plant

 
14.09.06 15:42
Interesting Read

ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=32585

NATCHEZ — America stands at a crossroads and for local leaders the roads cross in Adams County.

While officials from Natchez and Adams County were visiting the future coal-to-liquid plant in East Dubuque, Ill., officials from the Southern States Energy Board issued a study looking at the current energy situation in the America.

And by every measure, the report concludes that coal-to-liquid technology and other alternative energy resources are the key to America’s energy security.

The Southern States Energy Board is comprised of governors and state legislators from 16 states and two U.S. territories. Both Mississsippi Gov. Haley Barbour and Lousiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco are members of the board.

The group released the American Energy Study July 17 that presents a comprehensive plan for U.S. energy security through the production of ultra-clean fuels from domestic fuel sources. The goal of the study was to set an aggressive timeline for achieving complete energy independence by 2030.

Coal-to-liquid plants like the proposed Rentech South plant in Adams County, are a major contributor to achieving foreign oil independence, the energy board said in its recent press release.



“America is at a crossroads,” board chairman and Kentucky Gov. Ernie Fletcher told policy makers at the board’s annual meeting in New Orleans. “We can either choose to produce our own transportation fuels and secure our own destiny, or we can continue to rely on expensive foreign oil from unstable sources.”

“It is a very, very good report,” said Director of Project Development for the Natchez Rentech project Joe Regnery in East Dubuque. “It’s very thorough and we think it is well done.”

America imports about 60 percent of the oil it consumes. In 2005, oil imports totaled $680 million dollars a day. If it continues that number will soon reach $1 billion a year, the study says.

“The economic threat of oil peaking — of production beginning to fail to meet world demand and the associated dramatic price increases that can be expected — is staggering,” the study says. “Without an aggressive alternative fuel production program, the U.S. economy could lose $4.6 trillion in Gross Domestic Product and 40 million job years over employment if oil peaks in 2010.”

Currently the United States is at the whims of foreign oil and face serious risks, from competition of other world markets and disruptions from terrorism and natural disasters.

According to the study, there is an answer.

That answer is alternative fuels from coal-to-liquid facilities, biomass plants and oil shale companies.

“We have more coal in the United States than there is oil in the Middle East,” Regnery said in East Dubuque.

According to the study, that oil is one of the keys to producing a cost effective alternative fuel source.

Rentech plans to convert the coal into diesel fuel and jet fuel at both the Rentech Midwest plant in East Dubuque and at the Rentech South plant in Adams County.

Officials hope the Natchez Rentech plant will be in operation in 2011. The plant expects to produce between 10,000 and 20,000 barrels a day of fuel.

The American Energy Security Study compared the cost of producing fuel from coal-to-liquid technology to the coast of producing oil from foreign sources and found that producing fuel using the CTL process becomes cost effective when the cost of diesel exceeds $55 a barrel.

That is a conservative figure, Regnery said.

“As long as (crude oil) doesn’t dip below $40 to $45 we feel confident about our return,” he said.

If the recommendations of the study are followed the Southern States Energy Board predicts that the United States can eliminate approximately 5 percent of foreign oil imports per year for 20 years, beginning in 2010 with oil imports eliminated entirely by 2030.

“We control our destiny,” John Deisch, plant manager for Rentech Midwest, told local leaders in East Dubuque.

A copy of the full report and other additional information are available on the Web at www.americanenergysecurity.org.  
Antworten
Solarparc:

Es geht los, oder?

 
14.09.06 15:48
the funds are starting to flow
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=32587

Letter backs coal plant tax credit
By NOELLE STRAUB
Star-Tribune Washington bureau Thursday, September 14, 2006

WASHINGTON -- The three Wyoming members of Congress joined forces to request that the Treasury Department approve an application giving a company $350 million in investment tax credits to build the planned Medicine Bow Fuel and Power coal-to-liquids facility.

Republican Sens. Craig Thomas and Mike Enzi and Rep. Barbara Cubin sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson urging him to approve the tax credits for Houston-based DKRW Energy LLC, the company planning the estimated $1.3 billion project.

“Wyoming has abundant natural resources that can further increase the independence of sourcing petroleum products in the United States, and this program is important to developing those resources for the benefit of both the state and the country as a whole,” the trio wrote.

The project would expand U.S. refinery capacity, produce products to reduce air emissions, sequester carbon dioxide, produce more oil and increase the tax base and employment in the state, the letter said. It encouraged the department to give “due consideration” to the application filed by the Medicine Bow project.

Dale Groutage, a Democrat who is challenging Thomas for his Senate seat, has said while campaigning that for the past 20 years the federal government has been subsidizing the construction of these types of plants, but none has been built in Wyoming. He said bringing such a plant to the state would be one of his first priorities if elected.

The facility initially would produce about 11,000 barrels per day of liquid hydrocarbons, mostly ultra-low-sulfur diesel to be sold as fuel in the Rocky Mountain region.

Production could expand to 33,000 barrels per day, and the project in the long run would create 300 to 500 high-tech jobs in mining and refining, a DKRW executive has said.

The coal-to-liquid technology converts coal into a synthetic gas which is then either available for use or to be converted into materials such as diesel fuel.

A coal project tax credit and a gasification credit were included in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which the delegation supported.

Medicine Bow Fuel & Power LLC recently awarded a contract to Canadian firm SNC-Lavalin to perform feasibility, engineering and design services for the facility.

GE Energy and Rentech Clean Energy Solutions will provide the technical process for converting coal to liquid hydrocarbons, and Arch Coal will supply the coal. The plant would be located at Arch Coal’s Hanna mine facility in Carbon County.
Antworten
Solarparc:

Wann kommt die Entscheidung?

 
15.09.06 11:29
Anselmo hat bereits vor Jahren versucht, Green Fuel in China
zu etablieren. Doch der Vertrag wurde leider niemals abgeschlossen,
warum auch immer! Die Chinesen haben sich wohl für ein anderes Verfahren
entschlossen, um aus Kohle Öl zu machen. Es gibt da glaube ich drei verschiedene
Methoden. Egal, Silverado hat damals den Zuschlag nicht gekriegt... hoffentlich
sind die Vereinigten Staaten schlauer ;-) und erteilen Anselmo diesmal das GO!
_______________

At current oil prices, one answer to the evolving shortage of liquid fuels is coal liquefaction, HSBC bank suggests.

The CTL (coal-to-liquids) technology is well-established. It was originally invented in Germany in the 1920s and developed there and in the US in the 1930s. In the Third Reich it was used to make up to 600,000 barrels a day of petrol and avgas during the Second World War.

The technology was improved greatly in South Africa in the apartheid years to reduce dependence on imported oil. I have fond memories of researching and writing about the giant Sasol enterprise in 1964 when making my reputation as a young financial journalist. I still have a copy of my “Earth, Air, Fire and Water” study, which for the first time explained the complex processes to the public in layman’s terms.

Today there are three CTL plants in what is now democratic South Africa, converting coal into 150,000 barrels a day (equal to the output of a medium-sized oilfield). In addition to petrol, diesel and avgas, the process produces a wide range of by-products such as petrochemicals, waxes, feedstocks for plastics manufacture, and fuel gas.

While it’s forecast that the world will run short of conventional oil within a century, with most of the remaining large deposits in politically unstable regions, there is little recognition that coal is an abundant substitute. Enough for more than a thousand years.  

The US has the world’s largest coal deposits, with 268 billion tons of recoverable reserves. HSBC says that at a standard conversion rate of two barrels of synthetic fuels from one ton of coal, those reserves are equivalent to the 20 times the nation’s current crude oil reserves.

At capital costs of $700 million for capacity of 10,000 barrels/day and a 30-year life, operating costs of $15/barrel and current coal costs, breakeven for a coal-to-liquids plant in the US would be in the range $39-44 a barrel, assuming no tax incentives.

However, the new Highway Act provides a subsidy of $21 a barrel for commercial-scale CTL projects. Taking that into account, with oil at $50 a barrel (that is, well below current prices around $70), the internal rate of return on such a project would be in the mouth-watering range 22-25 per cent.

It would also be environmentally friendly, as the technology converts dirty coal into “ultra-clean” synthetic diesel and jet fuel that can be used in current engines without adaptation. And “the fuels are easily transportable and marketable, as they are compatible with existing petro-fuel distribution infrastructure” (unlike ethanol-blended petrol, bio-diesel and more radical alternative fuels).

HSBC suggests that beneficiaries of CTL development in the US could include mining companies such as Peabody Energy and Arch Coal,  and providers of proprietary technologies such as GEA Group (Lurgi), GE Energy, Royal Dutch Shell, ConocoPhillips, Rentech, Syntroleum – and South Africa’s Sasol. The latter, now listed in New York as well as Johannesburg, is becoming a global giant in synthetic fuel projects (see later article about gas-to-liquids).

China, which like the US has huge coal reserves but increasing dependence on imported oil, is adopting the CTL solution. Its first plant will start production next year.

State-owned Shenhua, the biggest coal mining company, in association with Sasol and Shell, wants to build additional plants to make liquid fuels equivalent to 10 million tons of crude oil a year by 2010, at a cost of about $10 billion, and 30 million tons by 2020.

HSBC says the typical final product mix from Fischer-Tropsch synthesis contains between 70 and 80 per cent diesel fuel and 10 to 20 per cent jet fuel, with “chemical and burning qualities superior to… their counterparts derived from petroleum through refining.”

The world isn’t going to run out of oil while there’s all that coal that can be turned into liquid fuels.

By Martin Spring in On Target, a private newsletter on global strategy 05.06.2006
www.moneyweek.com/file/13377/could-coal-replace-oil.html
Antworten
Solarparc:

Die Kosten sind kalkulierbar

 
15.09.06 11:36

"The US has the world’s largest coal deposits, with 268 billion tons of recoverable reserves. HSBC says that at a standard conversion rate of two barrels of synthetic fuels from one ton of coal, those reserves are equivalent to the 20 times the nation’s current crude oil reserves.

At capital costs of $700 million for capacity of 10,000 barrels/day and a 30-year life, operating costs of $15/barrel and current coal costs, breakeven for a coal-to-liquids plant in the US would be in the range $39-44 a barrel, assuming no tax incentives."
http://www.moneyweek.com/file/13377/could-coal-replace-oil.html

"Anselmo went on to state, regarding energy price comparisons, “We are talking about the difference between $10 or $15 LRCWFuel as opposed to the current market price of $70 for a barrel of oil.”  The committee recognized the tremendous economic advantage that LRCWFuel (at $15 per BOE) would provide as a low-cost, high-quality feedstock for gasification and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Thus, LRCWFuel would serve as an ideal candidate in that process for downstream production into ultra-clean synthetic gasoline, jet and diesel fuels.  Commercialization of Silverado’s hydrothermal treatment process is an outstanding opportunity to make America energy self-sufficient, especially since half of America’s coal reserves are considered to be “low-rank.”
http://www.silverado.com/may082006/

REIN VOM Kostenaufwand sind wir mit Green Fuel im Rahmen der Konkurrenz!!! Und nicht vergessen: Green Fuel kann aus NIEDERWERTIGWER Kohle Öl und Diesel machen, die anderen Verfahren brauchen wohl höherwertige Kohle! Damit wäre Green Fuel eine ideale Ergänzung zum Fischer-Tropsch Fischer-Tropsch Verfahren, oder?

Antworten
Solarparc:

Heute leichtes Plus ;-)

 
21.09.06 21:37
Aus einem anderen Forum:

"ATTENTION ALL NEW INVESTORS very IMPORTANT msg
TODAY marks a very important time in this company. Today, because of the great gold report and the stability of the company, is the day the shorts have to begin to find their exit, with as little loss as possible. They are indeed trapped and have been exposed for the liars and swindlers that they are, but they still must exit.

Because of the following assets and scenarios Silverado will be around for a long time and will be very profitable, today changed everything.

1. Silverado owns all of it's properties, including the 11 squaure miles of the recent 1 to 2 million dollar find.

2. Silverado has 6 million in the bank , and of course 1 to 2 million more due to a successful gold mining season.

3. Silverado is debt free

4. Silverados owner Gary Anselmo does not even take a salary

5. Silverado now has spent all that is needed, in a proven gold bearing area, to provide the infrastructure, neccessary to have many future low expense mining seasons.

6. Silverado because of drilling from the surface and the tunnels can start extracting gold ALL YEAR ROUND

7. Silverado has found so many indications of gold ( including their BEST results today ) that they now can not only mine all year long but can now have great reserves of gold.

8. Based on the fact that the areas are rich and PROVEN and ALL energy now can be focused on recovery the finds now will be huge ( in the 5 and 10 's of millions)

9. The fuel deals are very close, and Gary has proven his reliability and credibility.

10. The coal to licquid fuel business is ground floor and is a billion dollar industry, with few in it and fewer that do the type of treatment that Silverado does, withLOW RANK COAL.

11. The process is proven and does work.

12. Silverado has to look forward to state funding , federal funding and of course private funding, for their many fuel projects.

13. The military is very interested in using this technology not only because of the obvious cost savings , but the fact that Silverados fuel will not explode the way oil and gas does, it just breaks down to a friendly licquid.

14. There is a massive naked short position.

Today the constant blathering of the shorts that have repeated ad infinitum ( This company will go broke ) has been made the fairy tale that it is. The very same methods that were used last year to assess the gold possibilities is being used again , and the comment, this is the largest find yet on prelim reports, will push this company forward.
Silverado now has gold , low overhead , gold reserves and gold mining all year long. Silverado has 7 to 8 million in the bank, no debt, and owns all of it's properties. The fact is now ( unfortunately for the shorts ) Silveraado at 6 cents ( whickh would normally be high risk ) isn't any longer , due mostly from todays news release.
I can't think of a better investment, low risk , very high returns.

This is what I mean the shorts are now screwed , the fuel is imminent and will surely push the stock through the roof and they cannot under any circumstances put this company out of business, especially with todays great news. This press release while seemingly benign, isn't, if you glean the proper information from it, apply it and make these kinds of rational deductions. To be on point the fuel is here and Silverado is stable and moving to profitability in a gold bull market and an energy need so in demand the government has been forced to support it.

The shorts are left helpless, while they may go to their (illicit broker) when the fuel news breaks , to throw out tens of millions of shares to try to keep the price down , they will not be able to do so. The worst part for them , is it just makes their problem worse. They know this is the predicament they are in, but the only way out is to cover.

They have lost all their credibility today with all that nogolderado crap. It has harmed them more than anything, no one will believe anything they say anymore. What is more , is what will they say when the fuel deal is announced this or next month, ?????

suggest that it is green sludge , we all know the government did their research and it is a credible process , and historically has always been credible.

suggest fred burns and buick know more about it than govt engineers and scientists and Warrick Wilson, LAUGHABLE.

Whatever the folley it will be as ridiculous as nogolderado , and we all know where that stands.

the shorts are caught , and they will have to give in. There is no place to run.

Yes today paves the way for a very bright future. Just imagine the big investors are on the way, the minute the fuel deals are announced. Personally I think they waited too long , this stock at 6 cents with the fuel and gold humming in a gold bull market ansd a world wide initiative to become unreliant on terrorist oil.
duh?????

good bye fred burns and buick gary ruined you and you will be gone soon , clearly no one will believe you any longer"
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=32736
Antworten
Solarparc:

Interessante These

 
21.09.06 21:41
Aus einem anderen thread

"Tenacious: a) Sorry about Poly. He gets all worked up about things and starts to babble. But it doesn't mean that Silverado is not on the verge of making a break through with its Low Rank Coal Water fuel Division.

b) I believe the reason for the shiney gold nugget contest is strategic and smart, to encourage share holders to register their shares so that the short traders cannot get their slimey hands on them, and force the stock down. Short trading has been a huge pain for this stock for years. IMHO"
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=32747

Antworten
centy01:

solarparc

 
21.09.06 21:44
hallo solarparc, hast du eine genauere quellenangabe als nur das andere forum.
oder hast du eine vermutung wo es her ist?
danke
Antworten
TMTM:

An Solarpac o. T.

 
21.09.06 21:59
Antworten
TMTM:

An Solarpac

 
21.09.06 22:03
leider ist mein englisch nicht so gut. könnten sie mir das übersetzen.
Sie schreiben immer so interessante berichte, ich glaube an Silverado bin selber
mit ein paar am Markt. Heute hat es mal gar nicht so schlecht ausgesehen, verfolge den chart mittlerweile schon sehr intensiv, jetzt wie es aussieht wird wahrscheinlich bald
etwas kommen.. also gut festhalten und auf in den norden.
Antworten
Solarparc:

Übersetzung mit google

 
21.09.06 22:05
www.google.de/language_tools?hl=de

Einfach den Text hier rein kopieren und übersetzen lassen...

www.google.de/language_tools?hl=de


Antworten
centy01:

super tip!

 
21.09.06 22:12
nur lesen und verstehen sind zwei paar schuhe.
mit der übersetzung kann man doch auch nichts anfangen, außer das man die worte wenigstens kennt;)))
Antworten
TMTM:

Freie Entscheidung

 
21.09.06 22:24
es ist jedem seine freie entscheidung ob er Silverado Aktien besitzt,
was habt ihr denn schon zu verlieren, gold un kohle ist für die welt besser als
papiergeld und öl
Guten Abend
TMTM
Antworten
Solarparc:

Hello USA today

 
22.09.06 16:13
HELLO USA TODAY
USA Today Article

Military tests 1st synthetic fuel for jets

By William M. Welch, USA TODAY

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. — A 46-year-old jet lumbered off a runway this week on a flight that could lead to a new domestic fuel source, not just for the military but for commercial aviation as well.

An Air Force crew took the aging B-52 bomber aloft for more than two hours above the Mojave desert test range here in the military's first jet flight powered with synthetic fuel.

Air Force Undersecretary Ronald Sega declared the flight a success, even though an unrelated technical problem — a balky hydraulic landing gear — prompted the crew to cut short planned test maneuvers.

The Air Force's experiment is being watched by a commercial aviation industry eager to stabilize and cut fuel costs, which have soared along with the price of oil this year.

Sega, the Air Force's top energy official, said establishing the viability of synthetic fuel "is potentially important to others as well as" the military. Once testing on the B-52 is complete, he said, the Air Force will try the fuel in more modern jet engines, including those that power the KC-135 airborne refueling tanker, which uses the same engines as the Boeing 737, a workhorse of airlines.

"Some of the engines we have are the same as in commercial aviation," said Sega, a pilot and former space shuttle astronaut who rode in the cockpit for the test flight.

"We think this is a test that has potentially huge ramifications," said Maj. Gen. Curtis Bedke, commander of the test center here.

The Air Transport Association, the airlines' trade group, said it "strongly supports the development of alternatives to traditional oil-based jet fuel."

The bomber took off just after dawn with two of its eight engines powered with a 50-50 mixture of jet fuel, called JP-8, and a colorless synthetic fuel produced by a Tulsa-based company, Syntroleum. The synthetic was produced from natural gas, but officials said coal — which the nation has in abundance — could be used to produce an identical fuel.

The Air Force previously conducted more than 100 hours of ground tests with the fuel mixture. Within days, it plans to conduct more test flights, including use of the synthetic in all eight of the B-52's engines.

The objective of the tests is to establish that the 50-50 synthetic mixture produces engine performance equal to that of pure jet fuel, Air Force officials said. Their hope is that a switch to a synthetic mixture can be made without modifying aircraft engines, fuel systems and performance standards. The B-52 was chosen because its relatively old-fashioned fuel system permits crewmembers to manually direct fuel from specific tanks to each engine, making it easy to isolate the new mixture and measure its performance. Also, said Col. Arnie Bunch, crews were trained to land the craft under partial power if two engines fail.

Sega said engines running the new fuel appeared to operate identically to the other engines, though researchers will pore over flight data before reaching conclusions. He said the Air Force may also consider other mixtures, including a higher proportion of synthetic, which tests suggest burns with less pollution than regular fuel.

While new to the military's skies, synthetic fuel has a long history. It was championed in the late 1970s by the Carter administration, before the collapse of oil prices reduced interest and economic viability.

Sega said the method of turning raw carbon sources such as coal or natural gas into usable fuel was developed by German scientists in the 1920s and used briefly by Germany during World War II and later by South Africa.

The Air Force, which is the military's largest user of fuel, began looking at the idea anew in 1999, said Michael Aimone, the Air Force's assistant deputy chief of staff for logistics. He said the Air Force uses 2.6 billion gallons of jet fuel a year, at a cost of $4.5 billion.

Commercial U.S. airlines burn more than 53 million gallons of jet fuel per day, the industry group says. Fuel now amounts to 20% to 30% of total airline operating costs, twice the historical average, it said.

The project took on a new priority after President Bush, in his Jan. 31, 2006, State of the Union speech, set the goal of using technology to replace more than 75% of oil imports from the Middle East by 2025.

Bedke and other military officials said they don't know yet what kind of cost savings, if any, could be gained from using synthetic fuel. But its viability has grown with the price of oil. Beyond such savings, however, the officials said there are strong potential benefits of synthetic fuel, including cleaner emissions and a stable domestic energy source.
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=32756
Antworten
shaker:

sehr interessantes Thema!

 
22.09.06 16:34
ArchCoal muss man sich meiner Meinung nach hier genauer Anschauen - ist der 2t grösste Kohleförderer der Welt -> www.archcoal.com
Haben sehr schön korrigiert set Mai!!
(Verkleinert auf 88%) vergrößern
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 58187
Antworten
Solarparc:

Sehr interessant!

 
25.09.06 19:00
Hier ein sehr interessanter Artikel
über Silverado´s Green Fuel noch VOR
dem Kongress-Meeting!

"Ghost" Gold Mill Coming Back To Life
By Alex Michelini
Fri, 10 Dec 2004, 05:36 PST

FAIRBANKS, Alaska -- They've dusted off the crushing equipment, swept out the engineering and administrative offices and brushed a fresh coat of brown paint on the interior tanks, and yellow and green paint on the railings.

The spiffing-up at the shuttered Grant Gold Mill on the gentle slopes of Ester Dome in central Alaska, 10 miles northwest of here, is part of the effort to convert the mill into a demonstration plant producing liquid fuel from low-grade Alaska coal that could provide a significant answer to the world's oil crisis.

"We're all cleaned up and ready to convert. We have everybody on standby," said Garry Anselmo, CEO of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., whose subsidiary, Silverado Green Fuel Inc., ("green" as in environmentally-friendly) is inching closer to obtaining the government and private funding to get the project rolling.

The “green fuel” process involves crushing the subbituminous coal, found in enormous quantities in Alaska's Beluga coalfields, into very fine particles that are then pressure-heated to release some of the water. The resulting combustible mixture of particles suspended in water is earmarked for use in industrial boilers and big diesel engines.

And maybe some day in jetliners and automobiles.

"It's very safe, very clean and a low-cost replacement for industrial burning of oil," said Anselmo from his Vancouver-based Silverado offices.

Anselmo said "green fuel" can be made from Alaska coal for $14 an equivalent barrel of oil -- even less, $9 a barrel, from coal in the Wyoming-Montana coal region.


With oil prices surging and calls for alternative fuel reaching a clamor, the conversion of Grant Gold Mill into a demonstration plant has taken on new urgency.

"All these developments have given new life to our project," said Anselmo. "Raw oil burning is expensive and too dirty."

Over the next couple of months, Silverado executives will meet with key members of the Alaska congressional delegation, the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security to discuss funding for the project and the potential of the liquid fuel for use in the war on terror -- specifically, in Iraq.

Alaska Gov. Frank H. Murkowski has praised Silverado's "green fuel" potential.

As a U.S. senator two years ago, Murkowski, then-chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, wrote: "[Silverado's low-rank coal-water fuel] could satisfy a considerable portion of the United States energy requirements in an inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and timely manner ... [and] could constitute an important new source of alternative energy for the United States and the world."

Anselmo estimates Silverado needs $10 million to convert Grant Gold Mill and $10 million to run it for three years.

The "green fuel" project is running on parallel tracks with Silverado's ongoing gold mining operations.

In 1994, Silverado recovered the 10th largest gold nugget in Alaska history, weighing 41.35 Troy Ounces.

The demonstration plant is necessary to produce the liquid fuel in large enough quantities to show potential users that it is a viable alternative.

If successful, Anselmo said Silverado would build a commercial plant in the Beluga region, where coal deposits are estimated at 2 billion tons. There is another billion or more tons near Healy, deeper in the interior of the state.

Silverado is also exploring the coal found in the Powder River Basin in southern Montana and Wyoming to produce the alternative fuel, and has begun talks with congressional officials from those states.

Silverado's Grant Gold Mill, which recovered 15,305 ounces of gold and 8,231 ounces of silver in the 1980s, is considered an ideal location for the demonstration plant because a lot of the equipment in the half-dozen buildings can be used in the production of "green fuel."

As a result, the plant could be converted quickly and cost-effectively, according to Silverado.

The facility would also serve as a training center.

The meetings to be held with defense and homeland security officials grow out of the safety elements of the liquid coal fuel and its potential use in the war in Iraq.

"If a rocket or grenade is tossed into a fuel supply, there's a huge explosion and mass of flame," said Anselmo. "But our fuel is non-toxic, non-hazardous and only flammable when injected and contained in a boiler, gasifier or heat engine."

And it eliminates the possibility of environmental damage from spills, said Anselmo, because in the event of a tanker breakup, the mixture of coal particles and water would simply sink to the ocean floor and form a substrate conducive to plant growth.

In addition to markets in the continental United States, Silverado has been talking with Congressional and power utility officials in Hawaii, the Chinese Coal Ministry in Beijing, the State of Guijaret in India, and is exploring opportunities in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.

Warrack Willson, Silverado Green Fuel's vice president for fuel technology, led the development of the liquid fuel process.

Willson visited Asian countries currently using heavy fuel oil in their power plants, including coal mine and utility operators in China’s Heilongjiang Province, and reported progress toward forming a joint venture with Silverado to develop "green fuel" production plants.

"He spends his life on this," Anselmo said of Willson.

Anselmo, 60, has spent his working life in mining and finance. Before founding Silverado, he worked in field explorations with Kennecott Copper, Anaconda American Brass and American Metal Climax and then formed a consulting company and explored and built mines under contract for various mining clients.

www.greatpossibilities.com/articles/...tive_plant.shtml?page=1
Antworten
Solarparc:

Why I Bought Silverado Gold Mines

 
25.09.06 19:03
Why I Bought Silverado Gold Mines (SLGLF)
Posted on Jan 26th, 2006 with stocks: SLGLF
gold.seekingalpha.com/article/6195

Roland Watson (New Era Investor) submits: The name Silverado Gold Mines (ticker: SLGLF.ob) is unlikely to trip off the tongues of gold stock investors these days. In fact, it is more likely to bring out the emotions of laughter, anger and a general shaking of heads amongst the gold-investing community.

But to those for whom it merely evokes curiosity, it is sufficient to say that back in 2002, this stock experienced a massive 840% run up in price from $0.09 to $0.76 as investors piled in before even more rapidly crashing back down to earth 4 months later to $0.10. The whole episode is charted below:



Since then, the stock has drifted ever down with the occasional and short-lived adventure upwards.

Readers may remember that the bust was triggered by an article by an analyst who suggested that all was not well in the Silverado camp. Within a day of that article appearing, the stock began the downward phase of its roller coaster ride.

By the time the plummeting was over, recriminations followed as Silverado CEO, Gary Anselmo, expressed disbelief as to why this had happened while a certain gold stock analyst mysteriously disappeared amongst accusations of pumping up the stock.

So much for 2003, but this is now 2006 and though memories may not have faded, I came to this stock as one who was a distant observer of that fleeting price spike. Below is the relative performance chart for Silverado and the HUI since gold stocks resumed their bull market back in May 2005. The daily chart for Silverado is also displayed here.





As a chartist, I have two things to note. The first is that Silverado hit a multi-year low of $0.03 a share in May before progressing to a recent high of just over $0.08. That is a 267% increase and by any measure a top performing stock over the last 8 months.

The second observation is the high correlation between the HUI and Silverado price over this period. Note how the Silverado price roughly tracks the rises and falls in the HUI index as they both advance to greater highs. There appears to be an unmistakeable correlation in price changes.

This leads us to the somewhat surprising conclusion that despite its recent history, Silverado is now a full-blooded participant of the gold stock bull market. Not only that, it has proved to be one of the best performers over that period!

Despite what you may think about this stock, its assets and management, I don’t think you can argue with the price or the correlation, the only question left to answer is "Why?‿ why is this stock off and running and leaving even the favoured juniors coughing dust in its wake? Indeed, did any gold stock newsletter recommend Silverado after it crash-landed at 3 cents? Now that would be a true contrarian if ever I saw one!

To answer the question of why, I had a look at recent news releases about Silverado. The first was the huge granting of $0.05 stock options to Silverado executives this month. Indeed, it was a rather large grant of 37 million options including older options being reset to the same price. In fact, this raised a further question about how many fully diluted shares existed for Silverado and what proportion was held in the form of stock options? Looking around suggested a figure of over 300 million shares outstanding with at least 10% as much again held as stock options.

Well, despite that news release of January 6th, and assuming the market reacted accordingly, the price began to rise to greater heights.

Secondly, there were further announcements on the 19th of private placements of over 17 million shares completed by Silverado in the month of December 2005 and an substantial number of warrants as well. Furthermore, another astounding 85 million common shares were issued this month yet all this news of share issuance had the effect of adding more fuel to the share price.

So, we had a massive granting of stock options and private share placements. Does this mean anything? Is it just coincidence or do these participants think something is afoot?

At that point I was tempted to think it was all to do with Silverado's coal to oil project that for some time has been pursuing government funding. Do some think that funding is afoot? Perhaps, but if this stock was acting like an energy stock, why was it closely tracking the HUI index? The answer is obviously because most regard it as a gold stock first and an energy stock second.

So, with nothing positive to say in terms of the fundamentals but with this interesting action in the issuance of shares and options, one is led to the other theory of "price by association". By that I mean that Silverado is a low priced gold stock and that is good enough for people to invest modest sums in it. Are they crazy? Do they like losing money or what? I suggest there is more to it than just hating your money.

As someone once eloquently put it, "When the tide comes in, all boats rise.‿ when the gold bull market begins to really takes off, any gold junior company looks attractive even if you just place 1% of your portfolio in it.

Of course, some boats look more the worse for wear, but they still rise and that is why people invest in them. They see it as a gamble with which they may punt a few hundred dollars. If they win, they may win big time. If they lose, that's okay, it's only 1% or so of their portfolio and they are diversified in their risk allocation. It's not a big deal, it's a low risk to reward ratio with potentially big gains.

If the saga of the low grade NASDAQ IPOs of the 1990s teaches us anything, it is that when a mania takes hold, there is too much money chasing too few stocks. The money has to go somewhere and the psychology of low priced stocks will have its way as investors hive off a few percent in the direction of speculative stocks.

Now, don't get me wrong. Silverado may have some good fundamentals that justify a higher price than $0.08. It's just that I don't see them at this point in time! If anyone knows what they are, send me an email. The main focus of this article is to answer the question of why Silverado has been one of the best performing stocks of this second phase gold bull so far despite the reputation it has and despite massive share issuance.

I hope I have partly answered that question. I have bought my modest position in the company and we'll see where it ends up in the new two or three years. I expect some medium term correction in the gold bull soon, but this bull market is far from over. When the totals are added up at the end of it, we may yet be surprised by some of the names that get near the top of the performance list.

« Any opinions expressed on the Seeking Alpha sites are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Seeking Alpha or its management. »
gold.seekingalpha.com/article/6195
Antworten
79justme:

die artikel...

 
25.09.06 19:35
klingen ja beide schon nicht schlecht,aber der erste ist aus 2004 und der zweite von anfang des jahres...ich glaube zweifelsohne, dass die artiekl zu dieser zeit sicher ihren grund hatten, aber hat unser garry eine solch begeisternde wirkung auch bei den jungs des kongresses erreicht?...sind nur noch wenige tage bis die entscheidung kommen kann...
Antworten
Solarparc:

Es tut sich was in Amerika

 
28.09.06 12:16
World’s First Oxy-fuel Clean Coal Retrofit Announced

September 25, 2006 - Chicago, IL - Jupiter Oxygen, with the Ohio Air Quality development Authority and Orrville Utilities announced today that work will begin on the world’s first oxy-fuel clean coal retrofit of an operating electric power plant. At the Orrville, Ohio 25 megawatt plant, Jupiter will utilize its patented Oxy-fuel technology combined with the National Energy Technology Laboratory’s Integrated Pollutant Removal (IPR) technology to create the first-of-its-kind Oxy-fuel clean coal electric power plant. When the $34 million retrofit is completed in 2008, the plant will meet FutureGen’s 2020 goals for ultra-low emissions of mercury, NOx, SOx, and particulates, as well as be CO2 capture ready.

With a 250 year supply and 35% of the known reserves, the United States is essentially the Saudi Arabia of coal. Unfortunately, coal does not naturally burn cleanly, and it is difficult to attain permits for the construction of new coal-fired plants. This makes the development and use of clean coal technology important to America’s drive to become energy independent. Jupiter Oxygen’s combustion technology has been used commercially since 1997 and is now emerging as the most promising technology for use in coal-fired power plants. Unlike most clean coal technologies being developed, Jupiter’s process can be designed into new plants, or used to retrofit the existing 600 coal fueled electric power plants in operation throughout the United States.

“This innovative technology promises great economic benefits by providing existing power plants the capacity to modernize and deliver clean and economical power to our country and helps reduce the need to construct costly new facilities,” stated Ralph Regula (R-Ohio 16th). “Developing a clean and cost effective way to convert coal to energy is vital to America’s future. I am pleased to have been in a position to help secure the initial funding for this project.”

“This is a major step in the advancement of clean coal technology and Jupiter’s Oxy-fuel process,” stated Dietrich Gross, CEO, Jupiter Oxygen. “We are confident that the Orrville retrofit project will show the nation that we can safely use coal to meet our country’s need for electricity.”

“We are excited to have had our plant chosen for this first of its kind Oxy-fuel clean coal power plant,” stated Dan Preising, Director of Utilities, Orrville Utilities. “It is important to find a way to make our country’s existing fleet of power plants cleaner and safer for our environment.”

The good news for consumers is that not only will Jupiter’s Oxy-fuel technology reduce greenhouse gas emissions from coal burning power plants, it will do so at a cost that will not affect them financially. In fact, the fuel savings and increased power plant efficiencies give Jupiter’s technology a clear cost advantage over other clean coal technologies, especially coal gasification.

For new coal-fired power plants with carbon capture, the production cost for electricity is projected to be 1.7 cents per kwh. The total cost of electricity, including amortization and capital expenses, is projected to be only 5.1 cents per kwh. Each of these cost figures is lower then those of alternative clean coal technologies, which do not achieve the same results as Jupiter’s Oxy-fuel/IPR hybrid technology.

Jupiter’s patented process uses oxygen instead of air to burn the coal necessary to create the steam needed for power generation. Rather than reducing emissions of a single pollutant, the combined Jupiter Oxygen/IPR hybrid system combines technologies into a multi-pollutant control “package” that has been demonstrated to be an exceptionally effective environmental control system. In fact, testing shows that it is both practical and efficient to capture virtually all pollutants. The results indicated a 95% CO2 capture rate, 90% removal of all mercury, 99+% sulfur removal, 99+% particulate capture including more then 80% of the PM 2.5 particulate and a combustion level for NOx of only .088 Lbs/ MMBtu.

Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Jupiter Oxygen is a privately held company that has developed a revolutionary technology that makes it practical and cost effective to operate environmental friendly coal and other fossil fueled electric power plants. Jupiter’s technology is the innovative application of oxygen instead of air for fossil fuel combustion, which removes the barriers for carbon capture. Jupiter’s Oxy-fuel technology is patented in the United States and many other countries, and patents are pending throughout the world. The technology has been successfully used in commercial furnaces since 1997.

Quelle: www.careenergy.com/news/articleview.asp?iArticle=219

Coal to oil conversion gaining interest in China, U.S.
Driven by surging oil prices, but fueling environmental concerns
mongabay.com
August 17, 2006


High oil prices are spawning greater interest in technologies that convert coal into liquid fuel, according to an article published yesterday in The Wall Street Journal, but the shift could have a significant impact on the environment.

Heightened tensions in the Middle East combined with booming demand and political instability in other regions have put a premium on crude oil and forced China and the United States -- the world's largest energy gluttons -- to look towards secure sources of fuel. Both countries are coal-rich but petroleum-poor.





The Wall Street Journal says that China and the United States are actively developing coal-to-oil technology. China is building a multi-billion dollar coal-to-oil plant in Inner Mongolia and may be planning dozens more, while the U.S. Department of Defense is looking at coal-to-oil technology as a means to reduce dependence on foreign oil. The National Coal Council, an American pressure group, asking the government for subsidies that would help the domestic coal industry generate enough liquid fuel to satisfy 10 percent of America's expected oil demand in 2025. Senators Barack Obama of Illinois and Jim Bunning of Kentucky have introduced bills calling for tax incentives for coal-to-liquid fuel conversion plants.

Despite the push, the Journal article says the benefits of the proposed shift are questionable.

"It's far from clear... that the world would be better off -- economically or environmentally -- by burning more coal to fuel cars and trucks," writes Patrick Barta, author of the article.


Current coal reserves. Source: US Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration

Cleaner, more efficient use of coal could play a key role in addressing climate change, especially with the growing importance of coal as an energy source as world crude oil supplies are diminished in the future. Coal presently supplies about two-thirds of China's energy and one-third of the energy demand in the United States but, due to its abundance, is forecast to become an increasingly important relative to petroleum around mid-century.




He notes that coal-to-oil plants are extremely expensive -- "[a] single plant capable of producing about 80,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day -- less than 0.5% of America's daily oil diet -- would cost an estimated $6 billion or more to build" -- while there are serious environmental concerns about the process's production of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas blamed for global warming, and other pollutants. Barta cites studies from the Natural Resources Defense Council, an American environmental group, that estimate the production and use of a gallon of liquid fuel originating from coal emits about 80 percent more carbon dioxide than the production and use of other fuels -- gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel -- derived from crude oil. Barta reports that "some boosters of the coal-to-oil plants describe them as carbon-dioxide factories that produce energy on the side" but that it may be possible to significantly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by building new plants that use technologies to trap and store carbon dioxide during the production process.

The prospect of coal-to-oil conversion will add further to the already surging demand for the resource which now accounts for nearly 80 percent of electricity generation in China -- up from 71 percent in 1990 -- and 68 percent in India -- up from 65 percent in 1990 -- according to the World Bank. In the United States, where coal-fired power plants account for about 31 percent of the country's carbon dioxide emissions, coal is the source for nearly 40 percent of electricity.

The growing use of coal energy source, combined with concerns over climate change, is fueling the push for cleaner ways to produce energy from coal. Even the chairman of Shell has called for green coal technologies to fight global warming.
Quelle: news.mongabay.com/2006/0816-wsj.html

Antworten
Solarparc:

Amerika braucht neue Technologien!

 
28.09.06 12:25
Der Ölkonsum wird sich bis 2025 extrem
stark erhöhen! Amerika und die Welt brauchen
eine Alternative zu Erdöl! Wenn hier nicht bald
massivst investiert wird, haben wir vielleicht
bald Ölpreise von über 500 Dollar pro barrel!

www.nma.org/pdf/liquid_coal_fuels_100505.pdf

An die Tankstelle können dann nur noch die Superreichen fahren!
Deshalb ist es wichtig, schon JETZT nach vorne zu blicken und
in die richtigen Zukunftsprojekte zu investieren! Z.B. Coal-to-Oil!

www.nma.org/pdf/liquid_coal_fuels_100505.pdf

Antworten
18prozent:

ich würde sagen

 
28.09.06 13:33
wenn das klappt mit dem green fuel und silverado wirklich alle rechte behält
dann wird es richtig abgehen
ich meine nicht 100% oder so, ich rede hier von tausenden prozent
was ist schon ein kurs von 2 euro für eine firma die womöglich eine lösung für amerikas
öl-problem gefunden hat
also ich bin da sehr zuversichtlich und halte meine aktien egal wie tief der kurs gedrückt wird, eventuel kann man dann ja noch billig zukaufen
und ob der kurs nun morgen oder nächsten monat explodiert ist dann ja auch nicht so wichtig
meine prognose: wir sehen spätestens nächstes jahr die 2 euro

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 59210
Antworten
Vodka:

Da stimm ich 18prozent zu! o. T.

 
28.09.06 16:21
Silverado hat die Lösung für ein Globales Problem was Öl angeht!
Wenn also die Zustimmung für die Förderung kommt und das Projekt Ansehen und Zustimmung in der ganzen Welt erhält, dann ist es möglich, dass Silverado noch eine sehr wichtige Rolle in der Zukunft spielen wird.
Ich halte jedenfalls meine Aktien auch bis DIE NEWS kommt und erwarte dann Die Kursrakete des Jahres!
Antworten
Solarparc:

Alles nur Bluff?

 
29.09.06 23:10
www.im-mining.com/Articles/...utestoUScoal-to-liquidsstudy.asp

Silverado contributes to US coal-to-liquids study - 23rd March '06'  Featured News  
In response to the requests of several Congressmen and Senators, Silverado Green Fuel Inc. has submitted technical data on its Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel (LRCWFuel) – Hydrothermal Treatment process to the US Departments of Energy and of Defense. This submission will be reviewed and considered for inclusion in the current coal-to-liquid fuel study being conducted by the US Government. The study, which will analyze coal-to-liquid fuel technologies currently available, was mandated by an amendment to the Defense Authorization Bill passed by Congress last December. The purpose of the study is to require the preparation of a development plan for a national coal-to-liquid fuels programme.

“We are pleased to be able to supply the information relevant to our Green Fuel Project. While we realize the generally accepted definition of coal-to-liquid fuels refers to the synthetic fuels that are derived from gasification of coal, our product provides immediate entrée into the marketplace by providing fuel for oil-fired boilers. LRCWFuel also provides an ideal feed stock to create synthesis gas for the Fischer-Tropsch production of synthetic fuel. We continue to work closely with Congressmen and Senators from several states and are very near to realizing our initial goal of a Commercial Demonstration Facility,” said Garry Anselmo, Chairman and CEO of Silverado Green Fuel.

Anselmo continued, “In fact, since last summer we have been in confidential negotiations with a government entity and are now in the process of finalizing the agreement between ourselves and that party. This agreement will enable the immediate start of ground breaking on the United States’ first LRCWFuel Commercial Demonstration Facility. This is truly an exciting time for those who have worked diligently and waited patiently to see this project become a reality. ”

The Byrd Amendment (named after Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia) required the study be completed 90 days after passage of the bill. If the timeline is adhered to, the conclusion of the study is imminent. “We are hopeful that the study will be made available to the public by late spring,” commented Anselmo. “If the findings are published by then, it will coincide with the anticipated joint announcement of the long-awaited Silverado-Government agreement regarding the LRCWFuel Commercial Demonstration Facility.”

www.silverado.com/august042006/
"...we continue to move forward with our LRCWFuel project. Most of the ‘behind-the-scenes’ work with government authorities has been completed on the fuel project, and we anticipate a very exciting announcement either in August or September,” concluded Mr. Anselmo."


--> Der September ist vorbei! Anselmo hat sein Wort gebrochen!
Wer vertraut ihm noch? Also ich bin ganz schön enttäuscht!
Wenn ich als Chef einer Aktien-Firma meinen Aktionären sage,
dass ich mit News bis spätestens Ende September rechne, dann
halte ich auch mein Versprechen! Sollte es zeitliche Verzögerungen
geben, dann teile ich diese unverzüglich meinen Aktionären mit!
Also ein Satz wie: "We must wait until october" hätte mir schon
gereicht! Aber von Anselmo kommt gar nichts! Das ist echt traurig!
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 59680
Antworten
Jones2:

Solarparc

 
30.09.06 12:00
Anselmo sagt:I hope ....im August oder September ...
Da wir aber alle wissen, daß die Behörden, auch in Amerika
wohl langsam mahlen,ist es auch möglich im Oktober oder
November Nachrichten zu bekommen. Natürlich bin ich auch
sehr gespannt auf weitere news. Es braucht aber nun eine
Kleinigkeit geklärt werden und schon verzögert sich alles.
Einen Bluff würde ich es daher nicht nennen.
In der Aktie besteht Gott sei dank kein Abgabedruck.
Solange mit Kleinaufträgen von 100, 200 oder 500 Aktien
der Kurs gesteuert wird, bin ich nicht ängstlich.
Wir haben jetzt alle Höhen und Tiefen durchgemacht, da
wird man doch wohl zum jetzigen Kurs nicht den Mut verlieren.
Solange kein Dementi erscheint, bin ich weiter zuversichtlich.

 
Antworten
Ameise:

Hi ihr Kohlefans

 
30.09.06 13:20
Das Verfahren aus Kohle Öl herzustellen ist ja bekanntermaßen schon vor Jahrzehnten sogar in einer Pilotanlage ausprobiert worden.
Aber es gibt eine ähnliches Verfahren für Holz, welche auch schon seit Jahrzehnten bekannt ist und ebenfalls in einer Pilotanlage getestet wurde.  
Meiner Meinung ist es einfacher Holz zu gewinnen als unter hohem finanziellen Aufwand Kohle zu fördern. Deshalb ist es doch absehbar wo die Richtung hingehen wird. Meiner Meinung nach ist Kohle nur eine Sackgasse. Aber das ist meine persönliche Meinung.

Gruß Ameise.
Antworten
Solarparc:

Midas Research

 
30.09.06 16:15
Analyst: Midas Research
Silverado Gold Mines: Spekulativer Kauf  
Kurs: 0.081 USD
KGV:   Kursziel: 0.2 USD (!)
 
Midas Research stuft die Aktie des kanadischen Rohstoffförderers Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. mit "Spekulativer Kauf" ein. Das Kursziel beträgt 0,20 Dollar.

Silverado Gold Mines sei ein kleiner Goldproduzent aus Alaska mit erstklassigem Explorationspotenzial. Die Gesellschaft existiere schon seit mehreren Jahrzehnten und habe viele Stürme am Goldmarkt überstanden, allerdings immer noch nicht den lang ersehnten und vom Management oft als greifbar nahe in Aussicht gestellten Durchbruch bei der Aufspürung des zentralen Ursprungs seines Nolan Gold-Vorkommens erreicht. Der ursprüngliche Plan, im vergangenen Geschäftsjahr durch nennenswerte Produktionsmengen und Goldverkäufe erstmals einen Großteil der Explorationskosten gegen zu finanzieren, sei aufgrund eines unzureichenden Produktionsergebnisses verfehlt worden.

Um trotzdem die dringend benötigten Finanzmittel zu erhalten, habe das Management die "Reißleine ziehen" müssen und bei einem Großteil des hohen Volumens an ausstehenden Optionsscheinen und Aktienoptionen den Ausübungspreis drastisch auf 0,12 Dollar und teilweise auf 0,075 Dollar gesenkt. Dies führe zwar zu einer hohen Bezugsquote, gleichzeitig jedoch auch zu einer merklichen Kursbelastung.

Vor allem aus charttechnischer Sicht bestehe nun die Chance auf eine Gegenbewegung, an der technisch orientierte Anleger partizipieren könnten. Spekulatives Potenzial würden angesichts der aktuellen Preisexplosion bei Rohöl auch die Aktivitäten des Unternehmens bei alternativen Brennstoffen auf Flüssigkohlebasis bieten.

--> Das war eine Analyse vom 14. Juli 2004! Würde mich interessieren, wie MIDAS
Silverado Gold und Green Fuel HEUTE bewertet ;-)
Antworten
Juven:

@Ameise

 
01.10.06 18:38
Kohle könnte in Zukunft sogar wieder ein sehr wichtiger Energielieferant werden.
Im Gegensatz zu Öl ist Kohle auf der ganzen Welt verteilt und deutlich leichter zu fördern, als Du es hier darstellst. Die Ölfördende Länder sind langfristig nicht in der Lage Ihre Fördermengen zu erhöhen, sie sind bereits am Limit der Förderquoten. Muß meine Kinder in Bett bringen. Vielleicht später noch etwas mehr dazu.

Gruß

Juven
Antworten
centy01:

und noch ein wichtiger punkt...

 
01.10.06 18:58
der für die kohle spricht, sie reicht noch mindestens 150 Jahre, also dreimal so lange wie öl.
und die meisten vorkommen liegen in gegenden die unter einfluß westlicher demokratien stehen und nicht in der islamischen welt.
das soll jetzt aber keine politische wertung sein, aber die gefahr die von den fundamentalisten ausgeht ist nicht zu unterschätzen!
kohle wird ein alternativer energie träger bleiben auch wenn er die selben ökologischen nachteile wie erdö hat.
in ostdeutschland hat vattenfall aber ein neues völlig emissionsfreies kohlekraftwerk gebaut, ein guter weg in die zukunft.
Antworten
Juven:

Kohle

 
01.10.06 20:14
So, war vorhin noch nicht ganz fertig. Fakt ist doch, dass der Energieverbrauch in der Welt deutlich ansteigen wird. Allein China und Indien werden hier noch einiges dazu beitrage. Die Förderung von Öl wird immer aufwendiger, da die meisten ertragreichen Vorkommen bereits erschlossen sind und nur noch kleinere Quellen in Betrieb genommen werden. Man muß auch schon bei vielen Quellen nachhelfen, damit überhuapt noch etwas gefördert werden kann. Geht, wenn man  Wasser, oder Dampf in den Boden preßt damit der Druck konstant bleibt. Aber Fazit ist, die Förderung wird immer teurer werden. Also wird Kohle, die Vorräte sollen noch für ca. 200 Jahre ausreichen, wieder in den Fokus treten. Die größten Vorkommen an Kohle sind in Australien, Russland, China, USA und Indien. Also wie hier schon gesagt weg von den Fundamentalisten.
Man kann ja nur hoffen, das Silverado seinen Weg gehen wird, wenn schon nicht mit Kohle, dann donn hoffentlich mit der Hauptgoldader.

Gruß

Juven
Antworten
Vodka:

News News News

 
02.10.06 16:44
Endlich mal neue News!!
Hier mal ein paar der wichtigsten Fakten...

Bei jüngsten Probebohrungen in einem Teil der Slisco Bench im Bereich des
Hammond River (Abb. 1, siehe unter
www.silverado.com/slisco-fig1.htm) des Nolan-Projektes wurden
hochgehaltige und sehr ergiebige Flussgoldvorkommen gefunden.

Die Bohrergebnisse bestätigen das Goldvorkommen in den früheren
Bohrbereichen und haben zur Identifzierung eines Flussgold-Kanals geführt,
der sich auf eine Länge von 1.800 Fuß erstreckt

Die Goldanalysen für die übrigen Bohrlöcher sind noch nicht abgeschlossen.
Die Ergebnisse werden veröffentlicht, sobald sie vorliegen.


Die bisherigen ermutigenden
Ergebnisse der Probebohrungen sowie die Möglichkeit einer Verlängerung des
Kanals zum Südosten hin und die potentielle Entdeckung goldhaltiger
Nebenkanäle eröffnen viel versprechende Aussichten für weitere Entdeckungen
im nächsten Jahr.


...
Leider noch nichts zum Thema Green Fuel


Antworten
Ohio:

@ wodka zu viel getrunken ?

 
02.10.06 17:10
schau dir mal den Kurs an
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 59964
Antworten
Vodka:

@Ohio

 
02.10.06 17:24
Ich weiss nicht was dein Problem ist!?
Ich habe ein paar der wichtigsten Fakten der neuesten News zusammengefasst und du kommst hier mit nem blöden Spruch und einer angehängten Grafik vom aktuellen Kurs...
Das der Kurs im Moment sch... ist weiss ich!
Aber was willst du mir eigentlich sagen Ohio? Eine Begründung für deine Annahme ich hätte zu viel getrunken wäre mal nicht schlecht gewesen!
Oder wolltest du einfach mal was zum Thema sagen??
Antworten
Ameise:

@Juven

 
02.10.06 17:27
Du hast schon recht es gibt viel mehr Kohle als Öl, aber die guten Lagerstätten bei Kohle sind auch schon vielerorts abgebaut, jetzt geht es dann an die dünneren Flöze, in größere Tiefen, an die schwefelhaltige Kohle und in die Gebiete mit ungünstigen klimatischen Bedingungen. Das macht natürlich den Bergbau nicht gerade billig. Sehe da eher Potential für die vielgeschmähte Atomkraft. Die Franzosen bauen in Cadarache ein Versuchskraftwerk für Kernfusion. Weiß zwar nicht wie weit die mit dieser Technik sind, aber wenn man vorbeifährt sieht man das sie es ernst nehmen. Ist besser bewacht als manche Militäreinrichtung.
Wasserkraft und Windkraft hat auch in einigen Gebieten der Welt noch erheblich Potential. Solartechnik sicher auch.
Sehe Kohle daher langfristig als nicht so interessant an. Schnelle Kursbewegungen bei dieser Branche sind doch auch eher die Ausnahme.

Gruß
Ameise
Antworten
18prozent:

@ohio

 
02.10.06 17:28
schau dir mal den kurs an:
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 59965
Antworten
18prozent:

.es geht

 
02.10.06 17:34
doch darum billig einzukaufen und teuer zu verkaufen

wenn du das nicht verstest hast du nichts an der börse verloren ohio

theoretisch ist nämlich auch so ein chart möglich:
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 59966
Antworten
18prozent:

es ist nur ne frage

 
02.10.06 17:36
der zeit bis wir die 2 euro sehen

man kann natürlich auch bei nem kurs von 1 euro einsteigen
und dann angeben das man 100 % gemacht hat
hahahah
Antworten
Vodka:

@ 18prozent

 
02.10.06 17:46
Da hast du auf jeden Fall Recht!
Bei Silverado ist derzeit alles möglich.
Green Fuel
Die Hauptgoldader
und
die positiven News die in den letzten Tagen veröffentlicht wurden, heute herraus kammen und noch in Zukunft kommen werden!

"Erste 'Lode
Gold“-Bohrprogramme am Solomons Shear Projekt (Abb. 1) sind ebenfalls für
dieses Jahr geplant, so dass wir sowohl von unserem Flussgold- als auch von
unserem 'Lode Gold“-Programm aufregende Neuigkeiten erwarten."

Silverado wird ein immer sichereres Unternehmen mit interessanten Projekten, dass größere Mengen von den immer weniger werdenden Beständen von Gold auf der ganzen Erde besitzt!
Es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit bis die große Party beginnt!!
Außerdem gibts da noch Green Fuel...
Antworten
Solarparc:

Die Chancen stehen...

 
02.10.06 21:06
...eigentlich doch wohl ganz gut, oder?

Silverado´s Green Fuel trifft genau den Nerv der Zeit!
Die US-Regierung will Firmen helfen, neue Pilotkraftwerke
zu bauen, die später ausgebaut und in großem Maße Öl
aus Kohle produzieren können, ganz nach dem Vorbild: Sasol!

PRESS CONFERENCE ON THE “COAL-TO-LIQUID FUEL PROMOTION ACT 2006”  

“I would like to thank my colleagues and the representatives of the coal and transportation industries who are here today. We have come together to discuss coal-to-liquid fuel technology as a road map for American energy security.

“I believe coal-to-liquid technology offers America the chance to capitalize on a domestic resource that will provide the fuel for economic growth and the energy security required in today’s world.

“Working with some of my friends who are here with me today, I have put together a bill that will provide the right combination of incentives to create a backbone of coal-to-liquid production in the United States.

“S. 3325, the Coal-To-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act of 2006, is a three-part, comprehensive effort to create a vibrant domestic coal-to-liquid fuel market.

“First, this bill expands and enhances the loan guarantee program included in the Energy Policy Act we passed last year. It also creates a new program at the Department of Energy, allowing the Secretary to provide planning loans to help companies prepare a plant for construction.

“Second, this legislation will expand investment tax credits and expensing provisions to include coal-to-liquid plants. These tax incentives build on the loans and loan guarantees and will spur the investment needed to build these multi-billion dollar plants. This bill will also extend the fuel excise tax credit for coal-to-liquid fuels to provide support during initial production.

“Third, this bill provides the Department of Defense the funding to purchase, test, and integrate these fuels into the military. Coal-to-liquid plants will provide our armed forces with a secure domestic fuel supply.

“By combining the abilities of the Department of Energy and Department of Defense with incentives in the Tax Code, I am confident that America will become the world leader in coal-to-liquid fuels production.

“The next step will be to get this bill passed. I am optimistic that we will be able to have a hearing in the Energy committee following the July 4th recess. The Chairman of the Energy Committee and the Majority Leader have told me that they hope to assemble new energy legislation by the middle of next month. I believe that these coal-to-liquid provisions could be an important part of that package.

“I will continue to work with my colleagues on this issue. It is important that we do everything we can to reduce our dependency on foreign oil and identify new means to provide some relief for Americans who are feeling the pinch from rising energy costs.”  
bunning.senate.gov/...es.Detail&Speech_id=76&Month=6&Year=2006



Coal-to-liquid fuel offers answer to energy woes
By David Dapice

19-07-04 Amid continuing violence in the Middle East, the issue of energy security is again on the front burner. With oil prices rising to a peak of $ 40 a barrel, countries have been looking at alternative energy with a greater urgency.
This heightened sense of urgency, fortunately, has come at a time when there is evidence that a new approach using existing resources and technology can provide alternative energy to many countries.

A glimmer of good news recently appeared: China signed an agreement with Sasol, a South African energy and chemicals firm, to build two coal-to-liquid fuel plants in China. These plants, costing $ 3 bn each, are reported to jointly produce 60 mm tons of liquid fuel (440 mm barrels) a year. Since China imported 100 mm tons of oil last year, these plants would give China much control over its domestic energy situation, though its demand is growing fast. The raw material and capital costs of a barrel of fuel would fall under $ 10 and other costs would not bring total costs over $ 15.
Coal resources of 1 tn tons are widely distributed around the world. Many countries, including China, India, Russia, Ukraine, Germany, Poland, South Africa, the United States and Australia have extensive coal deposits that would last 100 years or more at current rates of exploitation. But coal is a highly polluting fuel when burned directly and also emits a lot of global-warming carbon dioxide.

The Sasol technology, a third-generation Fischer-Tropsch process, was developed in Germany and used in World War II, and later in South Africa. (Steam and oxygen are passed over coke at high temperatures and pressures; hydrogen and carbon monoxide are produced and then reassembled into liquid fuels.)
It has long been too expensive to compete with standard crude oil. On the plus side, sulphur and other pollutants such as ash and mercury are removed -- the sulphur can be sold as a by-product -- and carbon dioxide is segregated and can be injected underground. If hydrogen is needed for fuel cells, these plants can also provide it. In the near term, the petrol and diesel produced are high grade and clean, meeting even future '”lean diesel” requirements of the United States.

The real question is if these plants can be built and reliably produce fuels for less than $ 20 a barrel. Sasol already produces 150,000 bpd from coal. (Conversion from natural gas is cheaper and Sasol is in the process of switching its feedstock to gas in South Africa.)
Each of the Chinese plants would be four times as large as the existing Sasol plant, and scaling up can involve difficulties. If Sasol can make these larger plants work at the publicised costs, this technology could be used by many other nations -- rich and poor -- who are willing to forego periods of very cheap oil for more security. (Indeed, even oil-producing Indonesia is looking into a coal-to-liquids plant as it now imports oil.)
This technology also works in converting coal to natural gas at a cost of $ 3 to $ 3.50 per mm Btu. Since current natural-gas prices in the US are roughly double that, it would appear that coal-to-gas is also an economically viable technology.

The coal-to-liquid technology would compete with the evolving tar-sands technology being expanded in Canada. This technology involves the production, either by mining or extracting with steam, of heavy oil trapped in sand. The heavy oil is then massaged into more valuable fuels. This source already accounts for a quarter of Canada's 3.2 mm bpd output. It requires natural gas to heat the tar and is energy intensive, but still has production costs of under $ 20 a barrel.
Tar-sand reserves are estimated at over 250 bn barrels. These and similar technologies would allow much more plentiful isolated natural-gas reserves, coal and tar sand to be converted into liquid fuels. The long-predicted decline in petroleum production could be delayed for decades or more, and the geopolitics of energy would be rewritten at something close to or below current crude-oil costs.

Is there a downside to rapidly adopting these technologies? Yes, from a global welfare perspective. Now, onshore oil-production costs are usually under $ 5 a barrel. If prices are higher, somebody (the country owning the oil or the company producing it) gets the difference between the price and the cost. If we switch to $ 15-$ 20 costs from these other technologies, then there is no surplus of price over cost, or a much smaller one.
To use an economic phrase, the “rent” on oil production is destroyed in a quest for self-sufficiency. While true, the instability in oil prices -- as well as the threat of terrorist disruptions to supply -- are such that many nations might be happy to use their own resources to produce this vital input. They are no worse off if oil can be produced at $ 20 a barrel, unless the price temporarily plunges below that level as it did in the late 1990s. A stable price and supply prevents very expensive disruptions.

None of this answers critics who are properly concerned with global warming. Subsidies to hybrid or other highly efficient vehicles are probably needed to reduce emissions. In the longer term, fuel cells burning hydrogen and producing only water as a waste product are promising, but still far from being economically feasible.
Overall, the coal-to-liquid technology is only one element of an integrated programme that is needed to deal with fuel security, local pollution and global-warming issues. But, even alone, it could bring an element of stability to world oil prices and thus also to the global economy. In addition, if it redirects efforts from geopolitical competition and even conflict to investment and efficiency, it is a welcome development.
The writer is an associate professor of economics at Tufts University.
Source: Straits Times
www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex43159.htm

Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 60012
Antworten
Vodka:

Also...

 
02.10.06 22:59
wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe ist Silverado's Green Fuel die perfekte Lösung!
Folgende Argumente sprechen dafür:

1. Es werden bei der Produktion keine Abgasse produziert, die die Umwelt schädigen.
2. Das produzierte Öl ist umweltfreundlich.
3. Es ist günstiger gegenüber gefördertem Öl.

Zudem spricht noch dafür:

1. Keine Abhängigkeit von Import Öl.
2. Die Ausgaben des Militärs würden stark sinken. (Betrifft die USA)
3. Jedes Land ob arm oder reich könnte sich so eine Coal to Liquid Anlage leisten und sein eigenes Öl produzieren.

...u.s.w.


Ich denke wir können mit einer positiven Antwort rechnen, was die Förderung des Green Fuel Projektes angeht. Jedoch wird es meiner Meinung nach langsam mal Zeit, dass Anselmo mal was zu diesem Thema sagt!


Antworten
Ohio:

Kohle ÖL

 
02.10.06 23:06
wenn man was von Physik verstehen würde, dann könnte man ganz schnell und ganz leicht nach vollziehen, daß man ÖL aus Kohle nur mit riesigem Aufwand produzieren kann also wird sich ein Kursanstieg , wie ihn sich  hier ein Träumer vorstellt , nie und nimmer geben , sonst wäre diese aktie nämlich längst nicht so tief gefallen , es wird schon Gründe geben dafür  warum der kurs unten ist und zwar mit immer wunderschön gleichbleibend bist zum jüngsten Tag

aber ich will die Optimisten ja nicht  aus den Träumen reißen .. sorry schlaft schön weiter  und träumt süß  
Antworten
Ohio:

Kohle ÖL

 
02.10.06 23:19
und wenn man Ahnung hätte von der Weltkugel, dann wüßte man, daß  die Abbaustellen für Braunkohle alle dort liegen wo es auf der Welt "brennt"

also Finger weg von dieser Aktie

Prozent und Vodka dürfen die aktie ruhig kaufen wir können uns dann in 2 - 3 - 4 oder mehr Jahren mal darüber unterhalten, wenn ich dann evtl. noch bei dem Emfpangschef der beiden CEO`s "Prozent + Vodka"  , durchgelassen werde , wenn die Aktie explodiert ist .
Jedem seine eigene Meinung !!
Antworten
Vodka:

@Ohio

 
02.10.06 23:40
Du hast ja hier zwei TOP Beiträge zu diesem Thema geschrieben!

Du kannst wohl nichts anderes als hier Leute zu provozieren!
Du bist nicht in der Lage eine Diskussion zu führen sondern kommst direkt mit

"Prozent und Vodka dürfen die aktie ruhig kaufen wir können uns dann in 2 - 3 - 4 oder mehr Jahren mal darüber unterhalten, wenn ich dann evtl. noch bei dem Emfpangschef der beiden CEO`s "Prozent + Vodka"  , durchgelassen werde , wenn die Aktie explodiert ist."

Keiner zwingt dich diese Aktie zu kaufen! Wenn du also was dazu zu sagen hast, was informativ und passend zum Thema ist, dann sag deine Meinung und verpi.. dich!
Was du hier versuchst, schaffst du nicht! Mit so dummen Kommentaren erreichst du hier garnichts!
Antworten
feliz:

Kohle aus Öl ist "physikalisch" kein Problem

 
02.10.06 23:42
das ist jahrzehntealte, erprobte Technik.
Kosten pro Barrel: ca. 40 $

Und wenn man ein wenig googelt, dann wüsste man, dass Kohle recht gleichmäßig über die Welt verteilt ist, wie USA, Kanada, China, Australien,...
Allein die USA haben ca. 1/4 der Weltvorräte.

Zum Karrick-Prozess der Kohleumwandlung siehe hier:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karrick_process

Deshalb muss die Aktie aber trotzdem nicht plötzlich einen "Goldgrube" sein...
Antworten
feliz:

Sorry, muss natürlich Öl aus Kohle heißen... o. T.

 
02.10.06 23:44
Antworten
fritz01:

yep. o. T.

 
03.10.06 00:15
Antworten
Solarparc:

Neue Öl-aus-Kohle Kraftwerke

 
03.10.06 19:19
American Governors investieren bereits in neue Coal-to-Liquid Kraftwerke!
Wieso sollte also Bush nicht auch Silverados Green Fuel befürworten?

www.northernplains.org/news/CTL-7-06

Governor Schweitzer announces plans for 3 Coal-to-Liquids plants in Montana

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) - Two companies, including a leading coal producer, have agreed to look at sites in Montana for a plant that would turn coal into diesel and jet fuel, Gov. Brian Schweitzer said Tuesday.

Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer has announced plans for 3 proposed Coal-to-Liquids plants in Montana. The following article from the Associated Press details the Governor's plan.

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) - Two companies, including a leading coal producer, have agreed to look at sites in Montana for a plant that would turn coal into diesel and jet fuel, Gov. Brian Schweitzer said Tuesday.

While there's been no firm commitment from Peabody Energy or Rentech Inc., Schweitzer told reporters here that the prospects for a plant being built -- likely in southern or eastern Montana -- are "very promising."

Rentech Inc. is a developer of coal-to-liquids and gas-to-liquids technologies, and Peabody Energy calls itself the world's largest private-sector coal firm. A telephone message left for a Peabody Energy spokesman was not immediately returned Tuesday morning.

The companies, in a joint news release, said they'd agreed to look at sites in Montana and unspecified parts of the Midwest for coal-to-liquids plants that could range in production capacity from 10,000 barrels of fuel per day to 30,000 barrels per day.

Peabody has access to 9.8 billion tons of coal reserves and is evaluating "dozens" of sites in the country for coal-conversion projects, the statement said.

Those reserves include about 170 million tons of coal near Colstrip, in southern Montana, the governor's office said. Schweitzer expected Colstrip to be among the sites considered for a possible plant, given its "mine mouth" location, along with Billings and Miles City, because of access such as rail service.

He estimated that the type of plants being looked at would require an investment of $800 million to $1.5 billion.

Schweitzer has aggressively promoted his vision of a plant that would turn coal from the state's vast reserves into cleaner-burning fuels, such as electricity or diesel. He has met with energy and development firms and otherwise worked to woo investors.

Schweitzer said the firms had not asked for any kind of incentive package. He has described his role as a "catalyst" in attracting development.

Last week, Schweitzer met with the international engineering and plant construction company Lurgi AG.

Schweitzer, touting the "Fischer-Tropsch" process first developed in Germany during World War II, has taken some heat for his enthusiasm over building a coal gasification plant in Montana. Environmentalists said the technology is not as clean as it is purported to be, while political foes said the governor has unrealistic expectations.
Antworten
Solarparc:

Die Kritiker...

 
03.10.06 19:27
von Coal-to-liquid plants sind auch schon auf der Matte ;-)
Es gibt natürlich immer Pro- und Contra! Dieser Artikel ist
zur Allgemeinbildung in Sachen Coal-to-Liquid plants gedacht :-)

www.billingsgazette.com/...7/31/build/state/50-supco-plant.inc

Battle over proposed coal plant lands in Supreme Court
Associated Press

HELENA - The state violated Montanans' constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment by issuing a permit for construction of a coal-fired power plant near Roundup and exempting such projects from a key anti-pollution law, an environmental group has told the Montana Supreme Court.

The Montana Environmental Information Center says District Judge Richard Simonton of Glendive was wrong to side with the state in March without a trial. The high court either should rule against the government or send the case back the District Court for a trial, the organization said.

The case represents one of the latest legal tests of a constitutional provision declaring that a clean and healthful environment is one of Montanans' inalienable rights.

At the center of the dispute is a 78-megawatt plant planned by Bull Mountain Development Corp. of New York City. The project would rely on relatively clean-burning, low-sulfur coal mined nearby. Critics have warned it will pollute the air as far away as Yellowstone National Park, 112 miles to the southwest.

Although the state earlier this month notified the company the permit expired because construction did not start within the required 18 months, Bull Mountain officials see it differently.

Steve Wade, a Helena attorney for the company, said the permit was never revoked and that construction did get under way before the deadline. He noted the company has applied for a change in the permit to extend the period in which work must begin.

"The project is alive and moving forward," he said.

Regardless of the status of the permit, the legal issues before the Supreme Court will proceed, said Jim Jensen, executive director for the environmental group. As long as the controversy can occur again, the matter is not considered moot, he said.

His organization contends that the 2001 Legislature's decision to exempt plants such as Bull Mountain from the state's major facility siting act was itself a violation of the constitution's environmental mandate.

That law is intended to prevent or reduce the damaging environmental effects from such plants, but the exemption allows projects to be built "without ensuring that they are appropriate to the public interest and without mitigation of environmental harms," attorneys Mike Meloy and Jennifer Hendricks wrote to the court.

Lawmakers arbitrarily excluded certain power plants from the siting act with no regard for the environmental effects those projects would have, and the state has offered no compelling reason for doing so, they said.

The environmental center's lawyers also said the proposed pollution from the plant would deprive Montanans of their right to a clean environment.

The plant is projected to emit 176 pounds of mercury a year, even though technology exists to reduce that by 85 percent, the court document said. In addition, the plant would generate 8.2 million tons of carbon dioxide annually.

The state has not provided the kind of compelling need for the plant that is necessary to allow such pollution in the face of the constitutional protection, Meloy and Hendricks said.

They also charged that the environmental study of the project did not consider alternatives for meeting any increased demand for electricity through other means, such as conservation and renewable energy sources.

"We have a different view of the world when it comes to the legal standards around 'clean and healthful environment,'" Dan Hoven, another Bull Mountain lawyer, said of the arguments presented in the appeal.

"MEIC believes that any contaminant emitted at any level triggers analysis under the Montana Constitution," he said. "We believe that the clean and healthful provisions have been defined in elaborate fashion by the Montana Legislature when it passed these complicated regulatory schemes," such as clean air laws.

Hoven said the case is important beyond the fate of the proposed coal plant. Because it addresses a constitutional right dealing with the environment, it will define what happens to future permit applications for similar projects and "what we can and can't do in this state to develop natural resources," he said.

David Russoff, state Department of Environmental Quality attorney, said the case is significant because it could dramatically change the way the agency reviews air quality permit applications. MEIC argues that the department would have to determine not only whether a project complies with state environmental laws, but also whether it violates the constitution's clean environment mandate.  
Antworten
Solarparc:

Neuer Weg!

 
03.10.06 19:38
Über kurz oder lang wird an der
Technologie von Coal-to-Liquid plants
meiner Meinung nach kein Weg vorbei führen!

Langfristig betrachtet muss die Ölnachfrage  
irgendwie gedeckt werden. Öl ist knapp und
wird noch knapper werden! Ich spreche nicht
von den nächsten zwei oder drei Jahren, sondern
von den nächsten 20 oder 30 Jahren! Dann werden
wohl überall die Kohlekraftwerke wie Pilze aus
dem Boden geschossen sein! Coal-to-Liquid Kraft-
werke sind wohl die einzige Zukunft, die Amerika,
Kanada, China und Europa haben! Es muss einfach
noch viel mehr in diese Technolgie investiert
werden! Ich hoffe, dass Bush & Co. das bei Silverado
und Green Fuel genauso sehen ;-) Natürlich steckt
sehr viel Politik hinter solchen Entscheidungen!
Deshalb vielleicht die zeitliche Verzögerung! Und
die SHorties haben uns den Kurs solange kaputt gemacht!

Weil sie wussten, dass es lange dauern wird, bis die
News rauskommen! So hatten sie genug Zeit, den Kurs zu
drpcken und auf UNSERE Kosten Kohle zu machen! Doch die
Zeit ist abgelaufen! Silverado ist reif für die Zukunft!
Und die Shorties sind reif für das Cover-Zeitalter!!!

ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=33088

Antworten
feliz:

Ob die Euphorie so angebracht ist?

 
03.10.06 20:15
Coal-to-Liquid wird bei den reichlichen Kohlereserven der USA sicherlich umgesetzt werden. Ob das aber der riesen Markt wird von dem hier geschwärmt wird bezweifle ich.
Ich denke das wird eher einer von vielen verschiedenen Ansätzen beim Umbau der jetzigen Energiewirtschaft sein.

Auch wenn es banal ist und schon dutzende male darüber gesprochen wurde muss man eines immer wieder anführen. Die Lösung der jetzigen Energieprobleme (und die in näherer Zukunft) ist eigentlich ganz einfach. Man müsste nur konsequent die heute vorhandenen Techniken zur Energieeinsparung umsetzen und schon würde keiner mehr über eine Energiekrise sprechen.

In Verbindung von Energieeinsparung und den rasant wachsenden "erneuerbaren Energien" sehe ich deshalb schon einen Weg der mittel- und langfristig an den Coal-to-Liquids vorbeiführt.

Entscheidend für den Weg den wir bzw. die Technik gehen werden sind aber wohl, leider,  politische Entscheidungen. Da diese oft von Lobbyisten beeinflusst sind ist dies aber leider oft der falsche Weg.
Antworten
Solarparc:

Coal to liquid

 
05.10.06 15:10
Congress should promote coal to liquids technology to increase energy independence
By Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.)
5. Oktober 2006 (The Hill)

With gasoline prices at the forefront of the national energy debate, it is appropriate that Congress consider measures that would reduce our nation’s dependence on imported oil. One way that we can accomplish this goal is to incent the use of coal-to-liquids technologies that can replace petroleum in powering transportation.

There is a proven technology that enables the conversion of coal to liquid fuel. Coal liquefaction has been in use since World War II. In fact, today South Africa is using coal liquefaction to produce approximately 40 percent of its transportation fuels.

The technology is economic when crude-oil prices are approximately $40 per barrel. Oil prices are much higher than that benchmark, and the Energy Information Administration forecasts that prices for crude oil will remain above this level for the foreseeable future. In addition, our nation has an abundance of coal, with reserves of approximately 250 billion tons.

Given these economics and the benefit of moving closer to energy independence, there is great potential in converting coal to liquid fuel.

In recognition of the considerable potential for non-petroleum based liquid fuels, the Congress last year enacted a 50-cent-per-gallon excise-tax credit for alternative fuel mixtures — including fuel derived from coal. However, the tax credit is set to expire in 2009. Given the time necessary to finance, permit and construct a new coal-to-liquids facility, it is extremely unlikely that any coal-to-liquids production can occur by 2009.

While coal-liquefaction technologies have been used successfully for some time in some parts of the world, the technology has not been widely adopted in the United States. Placing in operation an 80,000-barrel-per-day coal-to-liquid facility would cost approximately $7 billion and take between five and seven years to construct. Therefore, the coal-to-liquids facilities would be unable to utilize the alternative-fuel tax credit, which is only payable when production begins, before it is set to expire.

To remedy this problem, I have joined with my colleague from Illinois, John Shimkus, in the introduction of legislation that would extend the tax credit through 2020.

In addition to extension of the alternative-fuel-mixture tax credit, Congress should examine additional methods by which we can incent coal liquefaction as well as specific partnerships that might facilitate the launch of coal-to-liquids production.

The novelty of coal-liquefaction technologies to the United States means that obtaining the investment capital for facilities is still somewhat uncertain. I am interested in exploring a means through which the federal government might be able to provide some additional financial encouragement to incent the construction of the plants.

One way to accomplish such a goal would be to establish loan guarantees or investment tax credits. While these methods would certainly be welcome, I am also interested in the possibility of establishing a different mechanism for government support.

For example, the federal government could establish a price-support-type mechanism through which the government would guarantee to make payments to coal-to-liquids producers in cases in which the price of their product dropped below a certain level.

Since coal liquefaction is economic when crude oil is approximately $40 per barrel, the price floor could be set in a range comparable to that price. Given the probability that oil prices would not descend below that price, it is highly unlikely that the federal government would incur any costs under such a system.

In addition, a price ceiling could be established, and if prices rise in the future above a specified level the coal-to-liquids operators would pay the federal government a certain amount, preventing a windfall to companies that launched with federal financial assistance.

Establishing a federal guarantee correlated to price would enable companies to make the necessary investments to construct and operate a number of coal-liquefaction facilities.

Our nation can gain energy independence through use of domestic resources. Since coal is our nation’s most abundant energy resource, we should harness federal energy policy behind a major effort to build coal-to-liquids facilities.

Boucher is a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/...906/ss_boucher.html
Antworten
Solarparc:

LRCW Project

 
07.10.06 23:25
Am 8. Mai waren folgende Firmen
beim Hearing des US. Government
vertreten:

-Silverado
-Peabody Energy
-Headwaters
-Rentek & WMPI Testify

Bei allen Aktienfirmen ist der
Kurs seit Mai extrem nach unten
gegangen! Zufall oder Short Seller?

www.silverado.com/pressroom.htm

ariva.de/quote/profile.m?secu=41202&kx=s

ariva.de/quote/profile.m?secu=27929

ariva.de/quote/profile.m?secu=30907&kx=s


Antworten
Solarparc:

Habt ihr das gewusst?

 
10.10.06 15:37
Im Januar 2005 wurde Green Fuel bereits
ausgezeichnet! Für ihr Coal-to-liquid Projekt!

January 20, 2005
Silverado’s Green Fuel Subsidiary President Awarded Ronald Reagan Republican Gold Medal
Silverado (OTCBB: SLGLF) announced today that the President of its wholly-owned subsidiary Silverado Green Fuel Inc., Edward J. Armstrong has been awarded the 2004 Ronald Reagan Republican Gold Medal Award.

Vancouver, BC & Fairbanks, AK (PRWEB via StreetCast.tv) January 20, 2005 -- Silverado (OTCBB: SLGLF / Frankfurt: SLGL / Berlin: SLGL) announced today that the President of its wholly-owned subsidiary Silverado Green Fuel Inc., Edward J. Armstrong has been awarded the 2004 Ronald Reagan Republican Gold Medal Award. Mr. Armstrong was selected based upon outstanding leadership in business and for displaying a commitment to President Ronald Regan’s vision for entrepreneurial business. Mr. Armstrong joins an elite group of business and professional executives who were nominated to receive the prestigious award.

“Mr. Armstrong has served as an Honorary Chairman of the Business Advisory Council and has provided much needed support,” said Congressman and National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Reynolds (R-NY). “This award could not have gone to a more deserving candidate.”

Mr. Armstrong has played an instrumental role in the progress of the Company’s ground-breaking Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel technology. The technology has been identified as a promising alternative to conventional energy solutions.
www.industrialnewsupdate.com/news/...05/01/silveradoas_gre.php
Antworten
Solarparc:

Vorbild Rentech

 
10.10.06 18:09
How do recent events affect plant’s plans?
BY JOAN GANDY
THE NATCHEZ DEMOCRAT

NATCHEZ — As oil and gas prices creep slowly downward and the announcement of a huge oil discovery in the Gulf of Mexico creates excitement in the energy world, the question comes:

Do lower prices and a significant discovery of oil affect plans to build a coal-to-liquid plant in Natchez?

Rentech Inc. is working on a plan to construct the plant at the former Belwood Country Club site near the Natchez port.

Woody Allen, chairman of the Natchez-Adams County Economic Development Authority board, said representatives from the company are in Natchez almost every week.

“Two people were here just a couple of days ago,” Allen said. “The project is on go, and they are working on their study. It is all very positive.”

If all goes as expected, the plant will be open in 2012. Do recent changes in the oil industry make a difference?



Frank Clemente, a Pennsylvania State University professor whose research specialization is energy policy, said he “would be shocked if it has any impact on their project.”

First, he said, demand for energy continues to rise because of growth in China and India. “Oil is a global commodity, and I think we’ve tremendously underestimated the energy needs of China and India.”

In China, consumers are buying 6 million automobiles a year, he said. “And I read a report the other day that said 90 million couples are waiting for a car.” Almost all of them will pay cash for the cars when they get them.

India is headed in the same direction, with their economy and standard of living rising rapidly.

Major oil fields are being depleted in Mexico, Kuwait and the North Sea, Clemente said. “That raises a lot of questions. How can you replace these enormous fields?”

Second, the Gulf of Mexico find announced in early September, about 270 miles southwest of New Orleans, was a huge discovery, but a couple of issues dampen Clemente’s enthusiasm for the find.

“How much is really there,” he wondered aloud in the telephone interview. “And also how deep is it?”

Reports show that the discovery was found almost four miles beneath the ocean floor.

“It’s going to cost a heck of a lot of money just for the pipelines to bring it out,” Clemente said. “I guarantee prices are not going down because of that discovery.”

Third, he said, the price of oil increasingly is finding a floor of about $45 per barrel. He does not believe the price per barrel is likely to go below $40 any time soon.

“Rentech is looking down the road. As long as oil stays above $40 a barrel, they’ll be fine.”

Allen said Rentech officials have told him they have a threshold below which their product becomes less viable, but he said that number is not for public release.

Even with a recession, Clemente said, “People don’t quit living. Babies are born. People are driving. Three million new people are living in this country each year. We’re growing and we’re using more and more oil.”

Another factor to consider is that some of the large oil companies have moved their large oilrigs from the Gulf of Mexico after Hurricane Katrina.

“They’ve gone from about 100 to about 70 rigs in the gulf. And they’re moving to the Middle East or Asia and signing four- to five-year contracts.

“An interesting question is, why is Saudi Arabia bringing huge oil rigs in from the Gulf of Mexico? I think they’re bringing in premium drilling rigs to get their oil. They’re having to go deeper.”

A new day is dawning for energy in the world, not just in the United States. And Clemente sees the Rentech-type coal-to-oil process as the way to a secure future.

“I think CTL is our salvation,” he said. He has never spoken to anyone at Rentech but is familiar with the company because what the company does relates to his area of interest and research.

“Our trade deficit is the highest it’s ever been. We’re buying oil overseas and mortgaging the futures of our children and sending our money to people who hate us,” he said.

“If we can create a clean way to burn coal, it’s an answer to a lot of our questions. Coal is our pathway to reducing our energy dependence on other countries.”

Soon the United States may be importing 70 to 75 percent of its oil, he said. It will follow for natural gas.

Clemente said Rentech obviously has been waiting “for their moment in time. I think Rentech has looked at this carefully and sees that oil is not going back down.”

Another break for Rentech is the interest shown by the U.S. military in the CTL fuel, Clemente said.

“The military is very interested in finding a fuel that can be used in all their vehicles. And they want a more powerful fuel. This fuel provides that.

“Third, this fuel has a shelf life of at least four to five years. You can put it in your lawnmower and leave it there all winter long. That’s another reason the military likes it. And, finally, this fuel does not freeze because it has less water content.”

There is more, Clemente said. The CTL fuel can be interchanged with gasoline and, best of all, can be distributed through the same pipeline system. “This is a big deal. You can’t do that with ethanol, for example.”

Rentech plans to put from $1 billion to $2 billion into the Natchez plant. Clemente said the project will be a huge boost to the Natchez-area economy during the construction phase.

And when the plant opens, the area can expect “well-paying jobs. These are clean plants that bring in educated people.”

Email this story | Print this story
Sound off on this article in The Democrat forums, plus see what other readers have to say:

Post a comment
$189,000
305 Linton Ave
--------------------------------------------------

$899,000
7 Bluff Hills Pl.
--------------------------------------------------

$159,000
6 Turtle Lane
--------------------------------------------------

$125,000
102 Cross St.
--------------------------------------------------
More Homes

Call Us Today:
601-442-9999
or
866-765-3392

101 N. Wall St.
Natchez, MS 39120

Market Watch

Oct 10, 2006 10:10 AM ET
ComStock 20 min. delayed
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SLGLF&read=33261
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 61265
Antworten
Solarparc:

Coal-based liquid fuel gaining interest

 
11.10.06 12:27
Coal-based liquid fuel gaining interest

www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/...B308-F6CC8301E844%7D&keyword

PrintE-mailDisable live quotesRSSDigg itDel.icio.usBy Dinah Wisenberg Brin
Last Update: 12:38 PM ET May 30, 2006


PHILADELPHIA (MarketWatch) -- Coal's sooty, Industrial Age image may be giving way to an updated vision: coal transformed into clean-burning liquid fuel that can power military jets and, ultimately, reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil.
With crude oil prices near $70 a barrel, U.S. military officials have stepped up the pace of research on alternative fuels, including jet fuel derived from coal, and are working with industry, other federal agencies, states and universities.
American companies are investing in coal-to-liquid fuel technologies for transportation as well.
"It's an economic security issue as well as a national security issue," U.S. Air Force Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff Michael Aimone said in an interview.
The Air Force, which accounts for more than half of total U.S. government fuel consumption and spends around $4.5 billion a year on jet fuel, intensified its focus on coal-derived liquid fuels after hurricanes Katrina and Rita "created such havoc in the energy markets," Aimone said.
The Air Force learned recently that its average fuel bill will increase by 57 cents a gallon as of June 1, and last June, before the hurricanes, the price rose 40 cents a gallon, he said.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has mandated that each military service explore assured energy sources, domestic sources of energy that don't require foreign petroleum, Aimone said.
South African Precedent
The Air Force is preparing to conduct its first flight test with an alternative to standard jet fuel in September, when it plans to use a blend of conventional petroleum-based jet fuel and synthetic fuel derived from natural gas, not coal, to fly a B-52. That test is considered a key step in the military's coal-to-liquid effort, as the same process is used to make the fuel and the final product is similar, whether derived from natural gas or coal.
Syntroleum Corp. (SYNM) of Tulsa, Okla., is to provide the fuel for the test.
With jet fuel prices outpacing crude in recent years, alternatives may appeal to the commercial airline industry.
"The basic thinking is that the synthetic fuels become economically viable when oil prices reach $50 a barrel," said John Heimlich, chief economist with the Air Transport Association, the trade organization for the major U.S. airlines. With oil prices below that, purchasers are better off with standard jet fuel, he said.
The Defense Department has briefed the ATA and about its coal-to-liquid fuel effort.
"It's something we're monitoring," Heimlich said. "Any incremental supply, especially if economically viable and environmentally friendly, is something in which we're interested, but it's not necessarily a viable prospect anytime soon." South Africa already commercially produces an alternative jet fuel.
For the past seven years, aircraft flying from Johannesburg International Airport have used a semi-synthetic blend of 50% jet fuel from coal produced at a Sasol Ltd. (SSL, SOL.JO) coal-to-liquids refinery, and 50% derived from traditional crude oil refining, Sasol says.
"Sasol has clearly demonstrated that synthetic jet fuel can be produced from coal; it has been proven in commercial use," a company representative said via e-mail. Sasol hopes to win final approval for use of 100% synthetic fuel, also derived from coal, this year.
The South African company said tests conducted in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Defense "confirmed the clean-burning and thermal stability of our jet fuel." Last fall, Sasol said it was in the early stages of evaluating coal-to-liquids opportunities in the U.S.
Exploring Alternatives
In the last century, the Nazi military relied heavily on synthetic fuel derived from coal, and U.S. Gen. George S. Patton syphoned some of it to continue the march to Germany, according to the Department of Energy. The U.S. government showed interest in coal-to-liquid fuel during the 20th century but it was never fully developed.
The U.S. military today is exploring more than one method of transforming coal into liquid fuel. The Fischer-Tropsch process, which Sasol uses, transforms a synthesis gas made from coal or other feedstock into liquid fuel.

The fuel for the B-52 flight test is manufactured with that process, using a natural gas feedstock. This resulting fuel has no sulfur content and burns much more cleanly than diesel or regular jet fuel, Aimone said.
New plants that might be built to meet demand for such jet fuel could generate profitable byproducts, such as carbon dioxide and electricity, Aimone said.
WMPI PTY LLC of Gilberton, Pa., is working to develop the nation's first waste coal-to-clean fuels complex in the anthracite fields of Pennsylvania. The company aims to break ground this year on the plant, which would turn waste coal into zero-sulfur diesel fuel or jet fuel.
The project has received commitments for $100 million in DOE grants and $47 million in state tax credits, contingent on other financing. Pennsylvania Gov. Edward D. Rendell created a consortium last fall to buy diesel fuel from the plant and agreed to purchase the fuel for state vehicles. DOD officials have expressed interest in the facility.
WMPI President John Rich Jr. said he is negotiating license agreements to use Sasol's Fischer-Tropsch process, Royal Dutch Shell PLC's (RDSA) Shell Global Solutions' gasification technology and another key technology from Chevron Corp.'s (CVX) and ABB Lummus Global's Chevron Lummus Global LLC.

Pioneering Pennsylvania
Separately, a subsidiary of DKRW Advanced Fuels LLC of Houston recently signed an agreement to use General Electric Co.'s (GE) coal gasification technology for a proposed coal-to-liquids faciltiy in Medicine Bow, Wyo. The plant aims to pipe diesel and other fuels to energy companies in the region. DKRW also agreed to buy coal from Arch Coal Inc. (ACI) and to license Rentech Inc.'s (RTK) Fischer-Tropsch technology.
Edward Lowe, general manager of gasification for GE Infrastructure Technology LLC's energy business, said in a March statement that while GE's gasification technology is being used in more than 60 plants worldwide, "this will be the first application of our technology for making transportation fuel from coal."
Coal also can be turned to liquid fuel by dissolving it and refining the resulting thick liquid like traditional crude oil.

A Penn State University researcher, funded by the Air Force and the Department of Energy, is developing two processes that he claims are different from conventional coal liquefaction methods and says he has powered a helicopter jet engine with a fuel derived at least 50% from bituminous coal. That fuel could be produced in existing, slightly modified oil refineries, Prof. Harold H. Schobert said. The fuel, produced at a pilot plant run by Intertek Group PLC's (ITRK.LN) Intertek PARC Technical Services in Harmarville, Pa., contains lower levels of aromatics like benzene and toluene than conventional jet fuel, and is almost free of sulfur, according to Schobert.
Penn State plans to host a jet fuels summit on June 7 and has received indications of interest from two major oil companies and a jet engine manufacturer, said Schobert.
The state of Montana, which sits on 120 billion tons of coal, is pursuing development of coal-to-liquids technology as well. The state's Web site, which says a barrel of synthetic fuel costs about $35 to produce, estimates that if the federal government became meaningfully invested in the concept, the U.S. could have a strong synthetic fuel industry by the next decade.
-By Dinah Wisenberg Brin, Dow Jones Newswires
-Contact: 201-938-5400  

Antworten
kleinlieschen:

#87 gähning interest

 
11.10.06 19:25
die nachricht ist vom 30.mai!
Antworten
Solarparc:

Investoren an Bord!

 
16.10.06 19:35
Silverado hat seit Juni nochmal knapp 2 Millionen
Dollar von Investoren eingesammelt! Die sind wohl
für Green Fuel bestimmt! Die Chancen steigen ;-)

16-Oct-2006

The Company completed the following transactions pursuant to Rule 903 of Regulation S of the Act on the basis that the sale of the shares was completed in an "offshore transaction," as defined in Rule 902(h) of Regulation S. The Company did not engage in any directed selling efforts, as defined in Regulation S, in the United States in connection with the sale of the shares. Each investor represented to the Company that the investor was not a U.S. person, as defined in Regulation S, and was not acquiring the shares for the account or benefit of a U.S. person. The subscription agreement executed between the Company and the investors included statements that the securities had not been registered pursuant to the Act and that the securities may not be offered or sold in the United States unless the securities are registered under the Act or are exempt from the Act. The investors agreed by execution of the subscription agreement for the shares: (i) to resell the securities purchased only in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S, pursuant to registration under the Act or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Act; (ii) that the Company is required to refuse to register any sale of the securities purchased unless the transfer is in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S, pursuant to registration under the Act or an exemption from registration under the Act; and

(iii) not to engage in hedging transactions with regards to the securities purchased unless in compliance with the Act. All securities issued were endorsed with a restrictive legend confirming that the securities had been issued pursuant to Regulation S of the Act and could not be resold without registration under the Act or pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration under the Act.

--------------------------------------------------
On June 9, 2006, the Company issued 11,081,832 shares of restricted common stock to one investor pursuant to the exercise of five common share purchase warrants for an aggregate purchase price of US $767,000.

On June 22, 2006, the Company issued 8,888,888 shares of restricted common stock to one investor pursuant to the exercise of a common share purchase warrant for an aggregate purchase price of US $355,556.

On June 22, 2006, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of restricted common stock to one investor pursuant to the exercise of a common share purchase warrant for an aggregate purchase price of US $320,000.

On October 10, 2006, the Company issued 17,543,859 units, each consisting of one share of restricted common stock and one "Series A Warrant," to an investor for an aggregate purchase price of US $500,000. Each Series A Warrant is exercisable for a period of one year, and will be exercisable for one share of restricted common stock at a per share exercise price of US $0.07.

biz.yahoo.com/e/061016/slglf.ob8-k.html
Antworten
Solarparc:

BUY-IF

 
19.10.06 10:23
www.americanbulls.com/...nyTicker=SLGLF&MarketTicker=OTC&TYP=S

SILVERADO GOLD MINES  
Daily Commentary

Our system posted a BUY-IF today. The previous SELL recommendation was issued on 09.22.2006 (26) days ago, when the stock price was 0.0570. Since then SLGLF has fallen -8.77% .

The BUY-IF alert is still valid. A confirmation today however is denied. The pattern is not rejected yet since the day was not a long black candlestick one. The market is currently testing your patience. Continue to do your homework by digesting all available information around.

The final judgment about the evolving pattern waits the next session. Either the alert will be confirmed by one of the valid confirmation criteria or the bullish alert will be void and null.

It is still your duty to check the confirmation criteria when the next session opens. Reminding briefly; a white candlestick with an upward gap, a white candlestick closing above previous close and a long white candlestick with a big downward gap is sufficient to confirm the BUY-IF alert though with a one day delay. Go long in any of these cases by respecting the benchmarks. In any other case, simply ignore the BUY-IF alert. The next session is the last chance we allow for confirmation. A confirmation failure renders the assumed bullish pattern totally invalid and starts the process of searching for a new pattern.

We do not yet suggest any new short positions given the bullish alert. The short sellers should consider covering their positions if the market confirms the BUY-IF signal. Otherwise, existing short positions should be carried.  
(Verkleinert auf 87%) vergrößern
Öl aus Kohle - Neuer Milliardenmarkt! 62723
Antworten
Solarparc:

@SolarBull

 
19.10.06 22:03
Der aktuelle Quartalsbericht steht unter:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SLGLF.OB

American Bulls sagt: BUY-IF

SILVERADO GOLD MINES  
Daily Commentary


Our system posted a BUY-IF today. The previous SELL recommendation was issued on 09.22.2006 (26) days ago, when the stock price was 0.0570. Since then SLGLF has fallen -8.77% .



The BUY-IF alert is still valid. A confirmation today however is denied. The pattern is not rejected yet since the day was not a long black candlestick one. The market is currently testing your patience. Continue to do your homework by digesting all available information around.

The final judgment about the evolving pattern waits the next session. Either the alert will be confirmed by one of the valid confirmation criteria or the bullish alert will be void and null.

It is still your duty to check the confirmation criteria when the next session opens. Reminding briefly; a white candlestick with an upward gap, a white candlestick closing above previous close and a long white candlestick with a big downward gap is sufficient to confirm the BUY-IF alert though with a one day delay. Go long in any of these cases by respecting the benchmarks. In any other case, simply ignore the BUY-IF alert. The next session is the last chance we allow for confirmation. A confirmation failure renders the assumed bullish pattern totally invalid and starts the process of searching for a new pattern.

We do not yet suggest any new short positions given the bullish alert. The short sellers should consider covering their positions if the market confirms the BUY-IF signal. Otherwise, existing short positions should be carried.

http://www.americanbulls.com/...nyTicker=SLGLF&MarketTicker=OTC&TYP=S

Mehr Infos gibts hier:

www.silverado.com
http://aktien.onvista.de/snapshot.html?ID_OSI=178484
http://www.ariva.de/quote/profile.m?secu=41202&kx=s
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=BB:SLGLF
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SLGLF.OB
Antworten
Zwergnase:

auch dieser thread ist es wert, mal wieder hoch

 
01.02.07 22:26
geholt zu werden...
Grüße, ZN
Antworten
Vermeer:

woraus man heute nicht

 
01.02.07 22:31
alles Diesel macht. Mein Favorit ist da immer noch ausgedientes Fritten-Fett :-)
Antworten
Minespec:

silverado und coal to liquid

 
23.05.07 20:09
Das Verfahren ist wie bekannt ein verfeinertes Fischer Tropsch und ein alter Hut. Sasol betreibt es seit Jahren u8nd verdient damit Geld. Silverado verdient keins damit da das Geld fehlt um überhaupt mal eien Demo Anlage zu bauen. Vielleicht in 2 Jahren . Bis dahin ist der markt bereit von Sasol oder Shell  und anderen Multis erschlossen.
Das ist der Grund warum die Silverado Greenfuel Phantasie abgeebbt ist.
Die Nachrichten sind schon hornalt, anfangs ging der Kurs ganz gut durch die Decke.
Silverado hat aber kein weiteres Patent  um das Geschäft zu machen.
Das Argument , wenn es sich etwas verzögert dass noch Gold da ist ist auch nicht überzeugend, da Slglf auch mit Gold keinen Cash Flow erzielt und nur weitere Kosten decken muss.

Also wenn dann läuft Greenfuel aber es müsste .. wie schon mehrfach wiederholt viele Voraussetzungen ( finanzieller Natur hauptsächl. ) vorliegen.
Abwarten vielleicht gibt es eine Überraschung.
Antworten
Minespec:

Silverado Bluff hat fertig

 
27.06.07 16:00
der Kurs absturz sagt Alles. Wer hier noch Geld drin hat ?
Wer nimmt die Aktien ab ? In USA praktisch kein Handel mehr, wenig Stücke.. sieht nach Kapitulation aus.
Antworten
Minespec:

Silverado seit Wochen nur im freien Fall

 
27.06.07 17:32
wenn der Abwärtssog so weiter geht ist die Gesellschaft in etwa 3 Wochen bei Null !
Antworten
Minespec:

Silverado heute weitere 4 % in USA abgerutscht

 
02.07.07 20:54
Pump-and-Dumperado kommt nach Hoffnungen der Uneinsichtigen nicht hoch.
Die Co versucht m.Meinung nach immer in steigende Kurse Kapitalerhöhungen zu plazieren um die Kosten zu decken. Dilution bis zum Abwinken.
Viel Vergnügen beim Geldvernichten und Melkaktion der "armen" Aktionäre.
Antworten
Minespec:

Silverado keine Umsätz mehr ! Das Ding = Tot

 
16.07.07 13:24
Die Sache ist gelaufen.
Antworten
Auf neue Beiträge prüfen
Es gibt keine neuen Beiträge.

Seite: Übersicht Alle 1 2 3 4

Hot-Stocks-Forum - Gesamtforum - Antwort einfügen - zum ersten Beitrag springen

Neueste Beiträge aus dem Silverado Gold Mines Forum

Wertung Antworten Thema Verfasser letzter Verfasser letzter Beitrag
69 2.843 Silberpeis in 2 Jahren? Silberlöwe Silberlöwe 31.03.24 19:59
50 9.621 silverado goldmines (867737) grazer 18prozent 08.10.13 14:09
2 80 Neues Jahr Neues Glück!! brunneta brunneta 05.10.11 09:19
2 422 Gold gefunden - Silverado Gold - Die Chance! DieChance SWay 24.07.08 09:35

--button_text--