und nicht von irgendwelchen Schmalspurabschreib-Analos:
www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/xls/index/SP500EPSEST.XLS
per letzten Freitag:
Q2 2009
337 issues (75.14% mkt val) rptd:
Oper EPS expected to decline 15.7%; As Rpt expected to UP 6.8%
Recent rpts not as good as initials; avg beat is 12%, but weighted down 1.7
Gewichtet sind die Zahlen also schlechter als erwartet.
I don't like proformas - but due to index changes, enormous charges, accounting changes we need to look at them: Actual weighted operating reported (same companies) are 1.7% behind of estimates and 36.8% lower than Q2,08; As Rptd off 23.7% 40.8% beat their estimates, with 25.7% beating last years EPS, and 16.4% beating both
Sales off 15.6%, with 22.8% ahead of last year, and 77.2% reporting lower sales;
As Rpt will show gain
Commentary:§No cash flow yet, but 2008 off 39.7%; Q1,'09 was off 44.5% fr Q1,'09; estimate Q2,'09 to be off high 30% ->less worse
2010 P/E bottom-up is 13.3 vs. top-down 21.5; the two will meet->based on history (stressful periods) it will be closer to the top-down
Estimates have turned slightly up for '09. But getting less worse is different than getting better, and significantly different than being good. Stats can be misleading-Fin'ls are up 244% from Q2'08, but are still down 85.6% from Q2,'07. The lack of charges (write-offs, impairments, layoffs, write downs,…) has helped and is a positive sign, but sales remain key - you can just cut so much and for so long; consumer spending (read as the impact of the stimulus bill) is key, with confidence right behind it.
www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/xls/index/SP500EPSEST.XLS
per letzten Freitag:
Q2 2009
337 issues (75.14% mkt val) rptd:
Oper EPS expected to decline 15.7%; As Rpt expected to UP 6.8%
Recent rpts not as good as initials; avg beat is 12%, but weighted down 1.7
Gewichtet sind die Zahlen also schlechter als erwartet.
I don't like proformas - but due to index changes, enormous charges, accounting changes we need to look at them: Actual weighted operating reported (same companies) are 1.7% behind of estimates and 36.8% lower than Q2,08; As Rptd off 23.7% 40.8% beat their estimates, with 25.7% beating last years EPS, and 16.4% beating both
Sales off 15.6%, with 22.8% ahead of last year, and 77.2% reporting lower sales;
As Rpt will show gain
Commentary:§No cash flow yet, but 2008 off 39.7%; Q1,'09 was off 44.5% fr Q1,'09; estimate Q2,'09 to be off high 30% ->less worse
2010 P/E bottom-up is 13.3 vs. top-down 21.5; the two will meet->based on history (stressful periods) it will be closer to the top-down
Estimates have turned slightly up for '09. But getting less worse is different than getting better, and significantly different than being good. Stats can be misleading-Fin'ls are up 244% from Q2'08, but are still down 85.6% from Q2,'07. The lack of charges (write-offs, impairments, layoffs, write downs,…) has helped and is a positive sign, but sales remain key - you can just cut so much and for so long; consumer spending (read as the impact of the stimulus bill) is key, with confidence right behind it.