”@isostarNa, das mit Biden ist schon etwas hoch gewettet. Aber ansonsten läuft es jetzt zumindest an.
Biden ist natürlich aus einem anderen Aspekt sehr wichtig (selbst wenn er MB nicht erwähnt): gewinnt er die Wahl ist das für MB ein Save Shot. Gewinnt Trump könnte es ungemütlich werden.
Camper22, 27.06.24 09:19
lesen Sie sich ein zu den statements der Republikaner zum IRA... alles andere als negativ - und dann noch den Marco Rubio der Republikaner... was unsere Medien hier in Europa verzapfen ist nicht wertvoll zu . Natürlich wollen die Demokraten die Angst schüren, dass die Republikaner den IRA kippen, kommt in diesen Artikeln zur Diskussion - kommt aber anders raus
www.politico.com/news/2024/06/13/...biden-energy-ira-00163295 Rep. John Curtis (R-Utah), who has made energy issues central to his Senate run, said Thursday that Schumer’s remarks playing up Republicans’ attempts to repeal the IRA through reconciliation represented “fear mongering,” adding that discussion is premature.
die Demokraten benutzen das um Stimmung zu machen, dabei haben die Republikaner schon mehrmals gesagt worum es ihnen geht: Die starken incentives für E-Autos, va importierte E-Autos (Schaden für die Deutschen), die Behinderung von Öl und Gasförderung und sie wollen domestic manufacturing, da werden sie den IRA nicht angreifen, siehe auch Marco Rubio (Republican) re Foreign Adversaries Act... sie sagen "repeal some and redo some"
A POLITICO analysis earlier this year of federal spending on infrastructure and energy under the IRA and three other laws found that only a small portion has been spent to date.
In fact, less than 17 percent of the $1.1 trillion those laws provided for direct investments on climate, energy and infrastructure has been spent as of April, nearly two years after Biden signed the last of the statutes.
edition.cnn.com/2024/06/16/climate/...-republicans/index.htmlIn a green twist of irony, the deluge of cash into red districts could actually save the climate law from total repeal if Republicans and former President Donald Trump win later this year.
Hudson was measured in his criticism when CNN asked him if he would vote to fully repeal the climate law if Republicans win control. He told CNN he wasn’t aware of the specific numbers in his district, and said that instead of seeking a full repeal, he would seek targeted changes.
“I think the experience with the [Affordable Care Act] tells us that rather than try to repeal one big bill with another big bill, we ought to look at the individual policies and the ones that we think are hurting American people,” Hudson told CNN.
Rep. John Curtis, a Republican from Utah and founder of the Conservative Climate Caucus, said that even though the GOP opposed the partisan reconciliation process used to pass the IRA, the bill contains many things that Republicans like.
“It’s a bit of a false narrative that you’re 100% in or 100% out on the IRA,” Curtis said. “I do think it’s a legitimate point that as these investments come into Republican districts, that makes it easier for Republicans to not necessarily support but see the impact of those.”
Curtis, who is running for US Senate in Utah, said he thinks if Republicans take control in 2025, they’d pursue more limited rollbacks to the law, rather than full-scale repeal.
www.eenews.net/articles/...ace-ira-at-politico-energy-summit/ www.politico.com/news/2024/06/05/...-climate-law-gop-00161822