Ich emrfehle heute : LIMELIGHT NETWORKS INC.

Zeit
          §Kurs Stück
16:23:49 1,98 $
          §145
16:21:50 1,97 $
          §100
16:21:39 1,98 $
          §100
16:21:39 1,97 $
          §100
16:21:36 1,97 $
          §100
16:21:36 1,97 $
          §109
16:21:36 1,97 $
          §100
16:20:55 1,97 $
          §100
16:17:13 1,97 $
          §100
16:17:13 1,97 $
          §100
16:17:10 1,97 $
          §100
16:17:10 1,97 $
          §200
16:10:11 1,9615 $
          §100
16:05:00 1,96 $
          §132
16:02:31 1,96 $
          §100
16:01:35 1,97 $
          §100
16:00:04 1,96 $
          §100
16:00:04 1,965 $
          §100
16:00:02 1,96 $

case
Reuters
January 10, 2014 5:15 PM

WASHINGTON, Jan 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a patent case involving technology for managing web images and video that features Limelight Networks Ltd and Akamai Technologies and which has been closely followed by much of the high-tech world for years.

The nation's top court also said it would hear a second patent case, Nautilus, Inc v Biosig Instruments, Inc., that centers on heart-rate monitor technology.

In the original case, dating back to 2006, Akamai accused Limelight of infringing on its patented technology for managing Web images and video.

The case has wound its way through the court system since then. Limelight objected to a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which had said that in the case of software and other so-called "method patents," two companies - for example, a manufacturer and a user - can jointly infringe on a patent.

Major technology companies including Google, Cisco , Oracle, Red Hat, SAP America filed a brief in support of Limelight, saying the earlier ruling could make tech companies subject to more infringement lawsuits.

"I certainly think that Limelight will be reversed," said patent expert Hal Wegner of the law firm Foley and Lardner LLP. "I'm sure the big software companies are delighted" that the Supreme Court will hear the case.

Akamai Technologies had asked the court to decline to hear the Limelight case, and filed a separate appeal.

The Supreme Court did not indicate if it would take the Akamai appeal. Nor did it say whether it would hear three other patent cases of interest: Sovereign v. Newegg ; Power Integrations v. Fairchild Semiconductor; and Organic Seed v Monsanto.

Datum Erster Hoch Tief Schluss     Stücke Volumen
  28.02.14      2,23      2,23§2,15 2,16 $ 218.831 463 T
  27.02.14      2,18      2,23§2,18 2,22 $ 197.020 410 T
  26.02.14      2,21      2,23§2,19 2,19 $ 148.440 313 T
  25.02.14      2,25      2,26§2,20 2,20 $ 228.213 499 T
  24.02.14      2,29      2,30§2,23 2,26 $ 376.757 0,81 M
  21.02.14      2,34      2,34§2,26 2,27 $ 436.552 0,92 M
  20.02.14      2,21      2,33§2,19 2,33 $ 536.734 1,19 M
  19.02.14      2,35      2,35§2,21 2,22 $ 340.039 0,74 M
  18.02.14      2,18      2,34§2,17 2,34 $ 713.811 1,61 M
  14.02.14      2,20      2,28§2,15 2,19 $ 819.571 1,78 M