I am appalled at the people still so apologetic for the court's actions.
Isn't it plain and clear now that the court has a different agenda? The EC, in its appeal, basically said your opinion holds no water legally and you should be ashamed to call yourself a FEDERAL JUDGE. No legal basis for the court to substitute its opinion as expert that cannot be subject to cross-examination. The EC says this is all UNPRECEDENTED in a VERY ILLEGAL way so we will take our arguments to a higher court that actually interprets the law correctly. This is OUR EC talking, YOUR EC talking!! They're telling the shareholders indirectly that this court is TAINTED and we need to go all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary!
It's like the robbers showing up to your house wearing YOUR watch and YOUR clothes and you call the police and the police says nothing to see here. You don't apologize for the police, you go to the Chief of police. If the Chief says nothing to see here, you go to a higher power and so on and so forth. We need to see this judge for what she is - TAINTED!
Take the time to READ her opinion!! She states the GSA is fair and reasonable!! Read it in its entirety...she says the division of money is FAIR and REASONABLE, she says she's not going to rule on the stuff that can push A>L, she even says in a subtle way that us shareholders are OUT OF THE MONEY. It was like reading the Examiner's Report and sounded pretty similar to what BR has been spewing. There's so much more in the opinion you should read!! IF you havent, READ IT and you'll realize why the EC appealed her opinion. I don't care if she denied it because either way, we were heading for appeal anyways. Besides, she had to deny it because it would simply be ILLEGAL to approve it.
Did you notice she had her pen out today signing away new lawyers for the hedge funds? And yet she didn't sign any of the motion to shorten. Maybe she'll sign them tomorrow? Who knows...
As of now, we should see it as EC and TPS vs the rest. So stop and think before you call her THJMW.