Ich habe ja nun spät am Abend noch ein wenig telephoniert. - Hierbei ging es um die Frage, wie die für den gestrigen DONNERSTAG (10.12.2009) direct nach der Gerichts-Entscheidung sehnlichst erwartete Stellung-Nahme des TRUSTEE einzuschätzen sein würde. - Und gemeinsam sind wir dann zu der Meinung gelangt, dass der wichtigste Satz der unten stehend an-citierten Quelle der folgende ist:
"The TRUSTEE is acting pursuant to his principal duty to return property to public customers while at the same time maximizing the estate for all creditors. This settlement does NOT affect the TRUSTEE's separate, PENDING claims against BARCLAYS in the Rule 60(b) motion and adversary proceedings, requesting the Court rule that billions of dollars of disputed assets that BARCLAYS is claiming REMAIN [!] the property of the LBI estate. The transfer of these assets would create an unfair WINFALL for BARCLAYS at the expense of public customers"...
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...-prnews-1983898792.html?x=0&.v=1Statement of the Office of the TRUSTEE of LEHMAN Brothers Inc. (LBI) SETTLEMENT to FINALIZE Private Investment Management (PIM) Account TRANSFERS; Over $92 Billion Transferred to 110,000 Former LBI Customers Since SIPA Liquidation Commenced
NEW YORK, Dec. 10 [2009] /PRNewswire/ -- James W. GIDDENS, the Trustee for the Liquidation of Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI), the broker-dealer of Lehman Brothers, is PLEASED to note the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's APPROVAL of a settlement agreement with BARCLAYS to finalize the transfer of Private Investment Management (PIM) assets to former LBI customers...
BARCLAYS hat sich eine erste KLATSCHE gefangen; denn die weiteren Entscheidungen werden kaum besser für BARCLAYS ausgehen, eher wohl schlechter...