vermutlich die doppelte Menge nacktes Shorten haben eine unglaubliche Sitiuation geschaffen, die einen starken Kurssprung herbeiführen wird.
Details to highest short interest in the history of Internet Capital and the development to this high, can help you to understand, why Flankenking believe, that we have additional to the 4.8 million official short interest additonal about 10 million naked shorting = all together about 15 million shares short by 39 million outstanding shares.
ICGE - Internet Capital Group, Inc. - Common Stock
Month ShortInterest PercentChange Average DailyShare Volume Days toCover
May 2007 4,812,530 3.72 230,057 20.92
April 2007 4,639,917 3.90 319,399 14.53
March 2007 4,465,590 (0.38) 324,132 13.78
February 2007 4,482,584 23.16 330,386 13.57
January 2007 3,639,584 10.55 375,012 9.71
December 2006 3,292,398 14.87 367,550 8.96
November 2006 2,866,156 (8.63) 250,179 11.46
October 2006 3,136,996 (0.86) 263,355 11.91
September 2006 3,164,150 (6.19) 165,906 19.07
August 2006 3,372,948 5.54 182,543 18.48
July 2006 3,195,855 3.66 222,566 14.36
June 2006 3,083,121 31.41 301,519 10.23
And we must look at the context between the increase of short interest and the development of the holding of the institutional.
The short interest increased in the last year from about 7% of the outstanding shares to 12% of the outstanding shares.
The instituional holdings increased in the last year near 30% of the oustanding shares to 83,7% of today?
And therefore we have a gap of selling. Who had sold the 25% from this gap to institutionals like Fidelity, who are now the greatest owner with about 12% of the outstanding shares?
Nevertheless was this 25% of outstanding shares coming alone from privates - I believe the smaller part. I believe between 15% and 20% comes from naked shorting - most not legal. And I can't understand the SEC, that they don't take any control and is breaking the existing rules.
Holdings Summary
ICGE
Internet Capital Group, Inc. NASDAQ-GM
Institutional Holdings Description | Hide Summary
Company Details
Total Shares Out Standing (millions): 39
Market Capitalization ($ millions): $447
Institutional Ownership: 83.7%
Price (as of 5/24/2007) 11.57
Ownership Analysis # Of Holders Shares
Total Shares Held: 103 32,342,072
New Positions: 16 627,429
Increased Positions: 50 7,197,250
Decreased Positions: 34 4,262,364
Holders With Activity: 84 11,459,614
Sold Out Positions: 15 1,199,827
Click on the column header links to resort ascending () or descending ().
Owner Name
Select a name below for more information. Date Shares Held Change
(Shares) % Change
(Shares) Value
($1000)
FMR CORP 3/31/2007 4,470,196 3,744,080 515.63% $51,720
GENDELL JEFFREY L 3/31/2007 3,262,780 0 0.00% $37,750
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADV... 3/31/2007 3,250,151 137,447 4.42% $37,604
CAPITAL RESEARCH & M... 3/31/2007 3,100,000 25,000 0.81% $35,867
MASON CAPITAL MANAGE... 3/31/2007 1,623,324 1,200,582 284.00% $18,782
Why is BIG SHORT and his gang so nervous? (Not rated) 26-May-07 07:19 pm I believe, when you read the postings of abominable, you see at once, how nervous are BIG SHORT and his gang is.
The reaons is clear: There is a gigantic gap.
Who had sold the between 25% and 30% of outstanding shares to the institutionals, who increased their positions about 25%-30% last year?
The shortselling-positions increased to a new high, but they increased only from 7% to 12% of the outstanding shares.
The question is: Who sold the difference of about 25% of outstanding shares to the institutionals like Fidelity?
It is clear, when we look at very low percentage of the private every day or month by Thomson Financial, that they could not have sold this amount. And as a result the answer is clear: The gap is most naked shorting, which is not part of the numbers about legal shortselling of 4.8 million
Zurück
