Es ist immer wieder erstaunlich, wie einige Dinge irgendwann einmal von irgendjemanden behauptet worden sind, die durch ständiges Wiederholen von etlichen Threadteilnehmern plötzlich als Fakt angesehen werden. Ich sehe das - im Gegensatz zu Waldgeist & Co. - nämlich völlig anders bezüglich unserer erteilten Releases für JPM. Zunächst einmal zurück zur "Texas Litigation", die mit dem aktuellen D.C.-Fall der Bondholder (der übrigens keineswegs "neu" weitergeführt wurde) zusammen hängt. Im DS ist dazu Folgendes zu lesen:
...Releases by Holders of Claims and Equity Interests 6. Global Third Party Releases a. On the Effective Date, for good and valuable consideration, and to the fullest extent permissible under applicable law, each Entity (Creditor or holder of an Equity Interest) that (i) has held, currently holds or may hold a Released Claim or any Released Third Party Causes of Action, (ii) is entitled to receive, directly or indirectly, a distribution or satisfaction of its Claim or Equity Interest pursuant to the Seventh Amended Plan, and (iii) elects, by not checking or checking the appropriate box on its Ballot or election form, as the case may be, to grant the releases set forth in Section 41.6 of the Seventh Amended Plan, on their own behalf and on behalf of anyone claiming through them, shall be deemed to have and hereby does irrevocably and unconditionally, fully, finally and forever waive, release, acquit and discharge (1) each and all of the Released Parties from any and all Released Claims and/or any claim, act, fact, transaction, occurrence, statement, or omission in connection with or alleged in the Actions or in the Texas Litigation...
Also, für mich kann man das nicht missverstehen, aber vielleicht lässt mich ja auch mein Schulenglisch im Stich... ;-)
Und bez. der GSA-Parteien kann man im DS Folgendes lesen:
...Notwithstanding anything contained in the Seventh Amended Plan to the contrary, except to the limited extent provided in Section 41.6 of the Seventh Amended Plan, all Entities, including Entities acting on their behalf, who currently hold or assert, have held or asserted, or may hold or assert, any Released Claims or Equity Interests gainst any of the Released Parties based upon, attributable to, arising out of or relating to any Claim against or Equity Interest in any of the Debtors, whenever and wherever arising or asserted, whether in the U.S. or anywhere else in the world, whether sounding in tort, contract, warranty, statute or any other theory of law, equity or otherwise, shall be, and shall be deemed to be, permanently stayed, restrained and enjoined from taking any action against any of the Released Parties for the purpose of directly or indirectly collecting, recovering or receiving any payment or recovery with respect to any Released Claims or Equity Interests arising prior to the Effective Date (including prior to the Petition Date), including, but not limited to..."
Also, kann ja sein, dass mich auch hier wieder mein Schulenglisch im Stich lässt, aber "prior to the Petition Date" bedeutet für mich vor dem Tag der Insolvenz-Anmeldung...
p.s. Wer es besser weiß, bitte korrigieren...!
Zurück
