Patriot Scientific der Highflyer 2006

Geld für Leckrone, nichts für PDS (und damit Patriot)

agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/...s/1370270#message

The end of the "Buy One (Fast Logic), Get One Free (MMP Portfolio) era"? Hope it is not too little too late. Cojones. I like that.

agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/...s/1370269#message

desillusionierend
Are you guys kidding me??????????
posted on Apr 26, 10 11:08PM by 1Rare1

What many had long feared is now reality and everyone is cheering? How much money did we lose? How many attempted side deals did Leckrone make all while PTSC assured shareholders that the procedures in place were safe? Dan Leckrone answering questions at shareholder meetings wasn't alarming? I've been invested 4+ years and now I find out, this entire time, the process of licensing may have existed under a conflict of interest? So everyone forgives the BOD for all past indiscretions related to CEO's, dividends, poor M&A acquisitions and now..........the MOTHER OF ALL FAILURES! Some of you guys are out of your freakin minds and several of you are clearly some kind of shysters. So not only did the company give our money away the last several years, our only source of income now appears to be in limbo.

How in the hell can shareholders in Patriot Scientific now feel safe if PTSC crawls back in bed with TPL? Is everyone really supposed to let bygones be bygones and forget what may have transpired? Charles Moore left for other reasons besides money, I think we have a VERY good idea why. Now Patriot gets the opportunity to begin spending it's reserves not on pursuing licenses but, instead suing our licensing partner. What investors should really take from this is that many times message boards are full of persons with bad intentions. The good news is we aren't broke, yet. The bad news is any good USPTO news will likely sit on the back burner while the licensing venture winds up in court. Way to go you bunch of classless, moronic and totally incompetent officers and directors of Patriot Scientific. This company is a fraud and everyone's been fleeced, except Swartz and management. You guys can spin this all you want but no one, not even PTSC management, is this dumb. Something finally came to a head causing the insiders to blow the doors off this little party. Evidently TPL got greedy and even PTSC mgmt couldn't stand it anymore. What a bunch of crooks.

geld weg....kurs wird sich davon nicht mehr erholen ?
oder weiterhin aussicht auf erfolg ?

Final heißt nicht final, zieht die Sache aber in die Länge - beimm 336 hat es ca 9 Monate gedauert bis zum NIRC (=Bestätigung des Patentes).
photos.imageevent.com/banos/uspto2/...ences%20and%20Claims.pdf
Zum Vergleich der Historie der reexamination von 890 und 336:
agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/...s/1372504#message

Last day to serve amended disclosure of asserted claims and infringement contentions (and related documents) for United States Patent No. 5,809,336 (“the ‘336 patent”)
April 19, 2010
April 30, 2010
Last day to serve amended invalidity contentions (and related documents)
June 3, 2010
June 30, 2010
Last day to exchange list of “Proposed terms and Claim Elements for Construction” for the ‘336 patent
June 25, 2010
July 23, 2010
Last day to exchange “Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence” for the ‘336 patent
June 25, 2010
August 30, 2010
Last day to file joint claim construction and pre-hearing statement
July 16, 2010
September 21, 2010
Claim construction discovery cut-off
August 13, 2010
October 19, 2010
Defendants’ opening claim construction brief
August 27, 2010
November 2, 2010
Event Scheduling Order
Date
New [Proposed]
Date
Plaintiffs’ responsive claim construction brief
September 10, 2010
November 30, 2010
Defendants’ reply claim construction brief
September 17, 2010
December 14, 2010
Patent Technology Tutorial*
*If requested by the Court
Approximately 20 days after reply claim construction brief
*If requested by the Court
To be determined
Status conference
Three weeks after the claim construction hearing
Defendants to serve willfulness documents; opinion of counsel
50 days after the claim construction ruling
Close of fact discovery
Six months after the final invalidity contentions
Initial expert reports
30 days after the close of fact discovery
Rebuttal expert reports
30 days after the initial expert reports
30 days after the initial expert reports
Close of expert discovery
Two weeks after the rebuttal expert reports
Trial
To be determined

THEREFORE, the parties hereby respectfully request that the Court adopt the following schedule for this action:: Event Date Last day to serve amended disclosure of asserted claims and infringement contentions (and related documents) for United States Patent No. 5,809,336 (“the ‘336 patent”)
April 30, 2010 Last day to serve amended invalidity contentions (and related documents)
June 30, 2010 Last day to exchange list of “Proposed terms and Claim Elements for Construction” for the ‘336 patent
July 23, 2010 Last day to exchange “Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence” for the ‘336 patent
August 30, 2010 Last day to file joint claim construction and pre-hearing statement
September 21, 2010 Claim construction discovery cut-off
October 19, 2010 Defendants’ opening claim construction brief
November 2, 2010 Plaintiffs’ responsive claim construction brief
November 30, 2010 Defendants’ reply claim construction brief
December 14, 2010 Patent Technology Tutorial* *If requested by the Court Approximately 20 days after reply claim construction brief
Claim construction hearing To be determined Status conference
Three weeks after the claim construction hearing Defendants to serve willfulness documents; opinion of counsel 50 days after the claim construction ruling Close of fact discovery Six months after the final invalidity
Event Date contentions
Initial expert reports
30 days after the close of fact discovery Rebuttal expert reports
30 days after the initial expert reports Close of expert discovery
Two weeks after the rebuttal expert reports
Trial
To be determined
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.
Dated: April 30, 2010
BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP
By: /s/ Edward Runyan
Edward K. Runyan
Attorney for Plaintiff Barco NV
Dated: April 30, 2010
FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
By: /s/ John Cooper
John L. Cooper
Attorneys for Defendants
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED
and ALLIACENSE LIMITED
Dated: April 30, 2010
KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE
By: /s/ Charles Hoge
Charles T. Hoge
Attorneys for Defendants
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated:
(Not Signed by judge)
The Honorable Jeremy Fogel
United States District Judge

The Crossflo DataExchange® is a fully integrated suite of tools, but customers can decide if and when they wish to add individual modules, so an affordable solution can be configured for each client's specific needs. This will enable agencies of different sizes, with different resources, to choose between a tool such as CDX ExchangeBuilder to design IEPDs, a CDX DataExchange base package for a standard exchange, or a CDX DataExchange enterprise solution to enable large scale exchanges incorporating CDX Portal and multiple data services.

Members of the media and conference attendees interested in speaking with PDSG at this event should visit booth number 1008, or contact Ken Blakeman at (603) 924-3268 or kblakeman@pdsg.com.

3. Responding to paragraph 3 of the Counterclaim, Defendants admit that TPL maintains its principal place of business at 20400 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA and that TPL is the co-owner of the ‘336, ‘749, and ‘890 Patents, and is the sole owner of the ‘212, ‘949 and ‘853 Patents. Defendants further admit that TPL is a limited liability corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. Except as so expressly admitted, denied.
4. Responding to paragraph 4 of the Counterclaim, Defendants admit that Patriot is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business at 6183 Paseo Del Norte, Suite 180, Carlsbad, California 92011. Defendants further admit that Patriot Scientific Corporation is a co-owner of the ‘336, ‘749, and ‘890 Patents. Except as so expressly admitted, denied.
5. Responding to paragraph 5 of the Counterclaim, Defendants admit that Alliacense Limited is a limited liability corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware with its principal place of business at 20400 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California. Alliacense has represented that it is a TPL Group enterprise. Except as so expressly admitted, denied.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. Responding to paragraph 6 of the Counterclaim, admitted.
7. Responding to paragraph 7 of the Counterclaim, admitted.

FIRST COUNTERCLAIM
8. Responding to paragraph 8 of the Counterclaim, denied.

DEFENDANTS’ AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Defendants allege and assert the following defenses in response to the allegations of the Counterclaim, undertaking the burden of proof only as to those defenses deemed affirmative defenses by law, regardless of how such defenses are denominated herein:
1. Plaintiff Sirius XM has infringed the ‘949 Patent.
2. The asserted claims of and the ‘949 Patent are valid and enforceable.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

A. WHEREFORE, TPL, Alliacense and Patriot respectfully request that Sirius XM Radio, Inc. take nothing by way of its Counterclaim, and that judgment be entered in favor of TPL, Alliacense and Patriot that this is an exceptional case and awarding TPL, Alliacense and Patriot attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285, and for such other and further relief at law and in equity as the Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: May 10, 2010 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
By: /s/ John L. Cooper
John L. Cooper
Attorneys for Defendant
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED and ALLIACENSE LIMITED
Dated: May 10, 2010 KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE, LLP
By: /s/ Charles T. Hoge
Charles T. Hoge
Attorneys for Defendant
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

kein Rating für PTSC, da viele Dinge nicht geklärt sind....
aber lest selber :

www.taglichbrothers.com/TaglichTrack/...atriotsci-05112010.pdf

(2) HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. v. Technology Properties Ltd., Patriot Scientific Corp. and Alliacense Ltd., Case No. 08-00882 JF (N.D. Cal., filed on February 8, 2008);
(3) ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. and ASUS Computer Int’l v. Technology Properties Ltd., Patriot Scientific Corp., MCM Portfolio LLC and Alliacense Ltd., Case No. 08-00884 JF (N.D. Cal., filed on February 8, 2008);
(4) Barco N.V. v. Technology Properties Ltd., Patriot Scientific Corp. and Alliacense Ltd., Case No. 08-05398 JF (N.D. Cal., filed on December 1, 2008); and
(5) Sirius XM Radio, Inc. v. Technology Properties Ltd., Patriot Scientific Corp. and Alliacense Ltd., Case No. C10-00816 EDL (N.D. Cal., filed in S.D.N.Y. on April 24, 2009 and filed in the N.D. Cal. on February 26, 2010 after transfer).

I. THE SIRIUS XM CASE SHOULD BE RELATED.

In the Acer/Gateway Action, (number (1) above), Acer filed a motion to have its case considered to be related to the HTC and ASUSTeK cases (numbers (2) and (3) respectively). This Court granted that motion in a written Order dated April 29, 2008. Or. Granting Pl.’s Mot. To Consider Whether Cases Should be Related (April 29, 2008) [Docket No. 22]. Pursuant to that Order, the first three cases were assigned to Judge Fogel. The third action mentioned above, brought by ASUSTeK, has settled and is no longer pending. In the fourth action, Plaintiff Barco, N.V. brought an Administrative Motion filed to rel te its case to the first three cases. On December 17, 2008, this Court granted Barco’s request and related that action to the Acer, HTC, and Asustek actions.
The Sirius XM Radio, Inc. v. Technology Properties Limited et al. action was filed in the Southern District of New York on April 24, 2009. The TPL Defendants moved to dismiss the action for improper venue, or in the alternative, to transfer the action to the Northern District of California. Judge Buchwald of the Southern District of New York granted the motion to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404 on February 17, 2010, and the Sirius action was transferred to the Northern District of California. A true and correct copy of Judge Buchwald’s Order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Local Rule 3-12 provides that an action is related to another action pending in this district when “(1) [t]he actions concern substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event; and (2) [i]t appears likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different Judges.” Both of these prongs are met here. The TPL Defendants are parties to all of the actions. The Acer and HTC actions share four of the same patents-in-suit (the ‘148, ‘749, ‘336, and ‘890 patents from the Moore microprocessor patent portfolio [“MMP”]) as the Sirius XM case. Similarly, the Barco action shares three of the same patents-in-suit, (‘336, ‘749, and ‘890 patents) as the Sirius XM case. All of the pending actions seek a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of the TPL Defendants’ patents. Because of the overlapping parties, property, and issues common to all of the actions, judicial economy and efficiency would be achieved by having a single judge hear and decide claim construction and related issues. Because the recently filed action brought by Sirius XM and the previously related actions satisfy both prongs of Local Rule 3-12(a), the TPL Defendants and Sirius XM1 respectfully request that the Sirius XM action be administratively related to the pending Acer, HTC, and Barco actions and assigned to the Honorable Jeremy Fogel pursuant to Local Rule 3-12(f).

II. SIRIUS XM AND THE TPL DEFENDANTS PROPOSE THE FOLLOWING CASE
SCHEDULE IN THE EVENT THE CASES ARE DEEMED RELATED AND
ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FOGEL.

As mentioned above, the Acer, HTC, Barco, and Sirius XM actions all involve at least three of the same patents-in-suit from TPL’s MMP portfolio. To permit Sirius XM and the TPL 1 Sirius XM’s joinder in this request is respectfully contingent upon the Court’s modification of the case schedule in the previously pending related actions to allow at least as much additional time for Sirius XM to prepare its case as is afforded it in the Schedule proposed in Section II of this Motion. Defendants an opportunity to prepare and advance the MMP portion of the case to the same stage as the other three pending suits, Sirius XM and the TPL Defendants have agreed to a proposed schedule as set forth in the table below, which follows the sequence of events set forth in the February 22, 2010 Order Following Case Management Conference in Case Nos. 08-00877 JF; 08-00882 JF; and 08-05398 JF, with the dates moved back by an average of 3-4 weeks for the disclosures under Patent Local Rules 3-1, 3-2, 4-1, and 4-2. The parties to the Sirius XM matter have met and conferred with the parties in the Acer, HTC and Barco actions. The parties in the Acer, HTC and Barco actions have agreed to file stipulations and proposed orders in their respective actions continuing the existing dates in their respective scheduling orders to match the MMP dates set forth below. The stipulations that would be filed are attached as Exhibit A. In addition, the Sirius XM action also involves three additional patents (‘853, ‘212, and ’949 patents) from a second TPL patent portfolio known as Fast Logic. Patents from the Fast Logic portfolio were initially asserted in the ASUSTeK action, which has settled. The Fast Logic patents are not involved in the Acer, HTC, and Barco actions. To minimize the burden upon the Court at claim construction, Sirius XM and the TPL Defendants propose that the Fast Logic patents be phased from the MMP patents such that all the patent local rule disclosures for the Fast Logic patents occur sixty days after the corresponding dates in the MMP schedule. Sirius XM’s and the TPL Defendants’ proposed schedule is set forth below in the following chart, which shows the existing schedule for various events, alongside Sirius XM’s and the TPL Defendants’ proposed schedule:

EVENT CURRENT MMP

SCHEDULE
PROPOSED
MMP
SCHEDULE
FAST LOGIC
PATENTS PROPOSED
SCHEDULE
Disclosure of Asserted
Claims and
Infringement
Contentions and
Related Documents
April 19, 2010 April 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Invalidity Contentions
and Related
Documents
June 3, 2010 June 30, 2010 August 30, 2010
Proposed Terms and
Claim Elements for
Construction
June 25, 2010 July 23, 2010 September 23, 2010
Preliminary Claim
Constructions and
Extrinsic Evidence
June 25, 2010 August 30, 2010 November 1, 2010
Last day to file joint
claim construction and
pre-hearing statement
July 16, 2010 September 21, 2010
November 19, 2010
Claim construction
discovery cut-off
August 13, 2010 October 19, 2010 December 17, 2010
Defendants’ opening
claim construction
brief
August 27, 2010 November 2, 2010 January 14, 2011
Plaintiffs’ responsive
claim construction
brief
September 10, 2010 November 30,
2010
February 14, 2011
Defendants’ reply
claim construction
brief
September 17, 2010 December 14, 2010 February 28, 2011
Patent Technology Tutorial* *If requested by the court Approximately 20 days after reply claim construction brief. Claim construction hearing To be determined Status conference Three weeks after the claim construction hearing For the reasons set forth above, Sirius XM and the TPL Defendants respectfully request that the Sirius XM Radio v. Technologies Properties Ltd. action, Case No. C10-00816 EDL, be related to Acer, Inc., v. Technology Properties Ltd., Case No. 08-00877 JF; HTC Corporation v. Technology Properties Ltd., Case No. 08-00882 JF and Barco N.V. v. Technology Properties Ltd., Case No. 08-05398 JF, and that the schedule set forth above be adopted in the case, with respect to Sirius XM and the TPL Defendants, if and when it is related.

Respectfully submitted:
Dated: April 30, 2010 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
By: /s/ John L. Cooper
John L. Cooper
Attorneys for Defendants
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED and
ALLIACENSE LIMITED
Dated: April 30, 2010 KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE, LLP
By: /s/ Charles T. Hoge
Charles T. Hoge
Attorneys for Defendant
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Dated: April 30, 2010 CARROLL BURDICK &
MCDONOUGH LLP
By: /s/ Eric J. Knapp_

Signed By Judge ___________

For Those Following The Communications with the PTO
posted on May 25, 10 11:37AM (Log in to use the IP Check tool) [?]
First thing this morning I received a reply from Bahr (Robert W. Bahr, Senior Patent Counsel, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy) advising that he will forward our concerns [of the prior (Opty's) email to the Director] to "the USPTO officials who oversee patent reexamination". This after thanking me for the input. The email turn-around was less than 24 hours.

The bad news is that he did not advise of a POC in that office, so there is no practical possibility of follow-up/further inquiries.

The good news is that our concerns (the handling of the '148, and more the '336) are being forwarded to exactly the right people to act on our concerns. Further, they are receiving the "prompt" for action from an "on high" PTO official and our concerns are IMO significant (non-compliance with statutory instruction). Thus, IMO the probability of getting immediate attention is greatly enhanced.

Thanks again to Opty for his efforts.

SGE

de.advfn.com/...^PTSC&p=0&t=1&dm=0&vol=1&" style="max-width:560px" />

www.taglichbrothers.com/equityuniverse/...tsci/patriotsci.aspx

www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_sec.asp?selected=PTSC&symbol=PTSC

New Pacer--CLERK’S NOTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
ACER, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________
HTC CORPORATION, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________
BARCO, N.V.,
Plaintiff,
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, et al.,
Defendants.

CLERK’S NOTICE

To all Parties and Attorneys of Record:
The Motion Hearing set for August 20, 2010 is CONTINUED to September 3, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Please report at that time to Courtroom 3 on the 5th Floor of the U.S. District Court,
280 South First Street, San Jose, California.
DATED: June 25, 2010 For the Court
Richard W. Weiking, Clerk
By: /s/
Diana Munz
Courtroom Deputy Clerk

"While I am convinced that the development of channel partners is critical for our ability to access the market, I must emphasize that we are in the early stages of this effort," said Mr. Flowers. "Expanding the number of engaged partners, integrating closely with their existing solutions and participating in end user proposals, etc. are all steps that we will be taking as we move forward to develop our business."

"I am pleased with our assistance to Patriot in identifying the right approach to marketing its CDX solution set and broadening its access to both new and existing markets," said Greg Baroni, chairman and CEO of Attain. "We at Attain have always been impressed by CDX and have believed the market for such data sharing services has been underserved. We look forward to continuing to help deliver CDX to a larger market audience."

About Patriot Scientific Corporation

Headquartered in Carlsbad, California, Patriot Scientific Corporation (PTSC) provides data sharing and secure data solutions for a connected world. These activities are funded with revenues generated, in a large part, from the Moore Microprocessor Patent™ Portfolio . For more information on Patriot Scientific Corporation, visit: www.ptsc.com.

About Patriot Data Solutions Group

Patriot Data Solutions Group, Inc. ("PDSG") provides products and solutions that enable mission-critical applications to significantly accelerate the time to value and reduce total cost of ownership for their data-sharing initiatives. The company's flagship product, the Crossflo DataExchange® solution, helps link systems together and facilitates secure data sharing for any information exchange initiative in the public safety and criminal justice markets. The solution has been designed to work directly with a number of national data sharing standards, including NIEM (National Information Exchange Model), and the Global Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM) and HL7 (Health Level 7). PDSG also offers Vigilys, a software product that leverages data accessed by CDX and provides a shared, map-based, common operating picture that allows field based first responders and office based emergency managers the ability to visualize incident responses and collaborate in real-time. PDSG's technological innovation is backed by subject matter expertise and proven methodologies, facilitating the rapid exchange of actionable data in mission-critical applications such as clinical quality improvement and emergency services response management.

PDSG has been working with some of the nation's earliest and most innovative data exchange projects including one of the most advanced statewide data-sharing initiatives to be deployed in the United States. PDSG is the data-sharing group of Patriot Scientific Corporation, which is headquartered in Carlsbad, California (OTC BB: PTSC). For more information on Patriot Data Solutions Group, visit www.pdsg.com.

About Attain

Based in Vienna, Va., Attain is a professional services company comprised of innovative problem solvers who deliver tangible results to address today's complex public sector challenges. With approximately 200 employees, Attain delivers strategic, operational support, healthcare solutions, and IT security and application services to more than 125 customers in the Federal, state and local government, higher education and nonprofit markets.

For more information about Attain, please visit www.attain.com.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this news release looking forward in time involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks associated with the effect of changing economic conditions, trends in the products markets, variations in the company's cash flow, market acceptance risks, patent litigation, technical development risks, seasonality and other risk factors detailed in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Contact:
Patriot Investor Relations
ir@ptsc.com
760-547-2700 ext. 102


SOURCE Patriot Scientific Corporation

agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/...s/1407312#message

New Pacer--ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STAY AND HEAR
posted on Jul 12, 10 11:51PM (Log in to use the IP Check tool) [?]

New Pacer--ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STAY AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS (Signed by Judge)


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DEUTSCHE BANK AG,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STAY AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

For good cause shown, the joint motion by Plaintiff Patriot Scientific Corporation and Defendant Deutsche Bank AG for an order continuing the stay of the action and continuing the hearing date and briefing deadlines on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The stay of this action is CONTINUED until October 1, 2010. The hearing date on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED until November 15, 2010, and the briefing deadlines are CONTINUED accordingly pursuant to local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 7-10-10 Larry Alan Burns United States District Judge
Case 3:09-cv-01500-LAB -BGS Document 26 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 1

Kurs in USA derzeit schon 11 Cents.

19.Juli 2010

HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROPROCESSOR HAVING VARIABLE SPEED SYSTEM CLOCK

Reexam Terminated -- Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexamination Certificate Mailed

Auf WO wurde heute glaubhaft berichtet, das die Telekom ihren Einspruch beim Bundesgerichtshofes wegen des Patents zurück gezogen hat.

Enforsys and Patriot Data Solutions Team to Enable New Jersey Law Enforcement Agencies to Successfully Share Information
SAN DIEGO, July 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Enforsys, Inc. ("Enforsys") and Patriot Data Solutions Group, Inc. ("PDSG") announced today that they have successfully teamed to provide multiple New Jersey ("NJ") law enforcement agencies with essential information sharing solutions. Enforsys is a leading developer of public safety software specializing in information sharing, forecast analysis, Computer Aided Dispatch, Records Management Systems, and mobile reporting solutions for law enforcement. Enforsys chose PDSG to enable several of its law enforcement customers to effectively transmit data to the New Jersey State Police's New Jersey Data Exchange (NJ-DEx).

"We are delighted to have worked with several of Enforsys' clients in New Jersey. Enforsys has developed an exceptional suite of products designed specifically for public safety and has earned an excellent reputation amongst New Jersey law enforcement agencies," said Brian Mooney, Sr. VP Operations with PDSG. "We are excited to have enabled several agencies to connect with NJ-DEx and to be working with several additional NJ agencies to publish information to Enforsys' new I-3 Exchange repository which makes reports available online for participating agencies."

"Enforsys chose to team with PDSG because its Crossflo DataExchange® platform complements Enforsys' solutions and because of PDSG's proven success working with the New Jersey State Police" stated Chief William R. Plate, Jr., Ret., Chief Operations Officer with Enforsys. "As more agencies feed I-3 Exchange repositories with Incident, Arrest, Supplemental, and Field Interview reports, we would expect to see a reduction in crime for participating counties. Local police will have more information available online from agencies across multiple counties to support investigations and other information needs."

agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/...s/1411219#message

Patriot Data Solutions Unit Signs Strategic Partnership Agreement With SRA Int'l - Quick Facts



(RTTNews) - Wednesday, Patriot Scientific Corp. (PTSC.OB) said its subsidiary, Patriot Data Solutions Group signed a strategic partnership agreement with SRA International Inc. Under the agreement SRA will become a reseller of PDSG's Crossflo DataExchange or CDX line of products.

PDSG's CDX Enterprise Solution is both an enterprise-class middleware platform and an end-to-end Justice systems integration solution. The solution includes CDX ExchangeBuilder, enables agencies to visually model information exchanges and develop NIEM-conformant Information Exchange Package Documentation. It includes a complete, secure, and robust data exchange platform and the CDX Enterprise Portal that represents a secure community interface for all identified Justice users.

Built upon the Global Federated Identity and Privilege Management framework, the CDX Portal allows Criminal Justice Information Services agencies to pass local security credentials and roles into the enterprise. The portal also includes CDX FindIt!, a best-of-breed data discovery application that allows users to search, sort and discover records enterprise-wide.

PTSC.OB closed Wednesday's trading at $0.13, down $0.01 or 3.85%, on a volume of 422,152 shares.

For comments and feedback: contact editorial@rttnews.com




Read more: www.nasdaq.com/aspx/...1820RTTRADERUSEQUITY_2191#ixzz0uP8npEbV

PDSG's CDX Enterprise Solution is both an enterprise-class middleware platform and an end-to-end Justice systems integration solution. The solution includes CDX ExchangeBuilder,which enables agencies to visually model information exchanges and develop NIEM-conformant Information Exchange Package Documentation (IEPD). It includes a complete, secure, and robust data exchange platform and the CDX Enterprise Portal that represents a secure community interface for all identified Justice users. Built upon the Global Federated Identity and Privilege Management (GFIPM) framework, the CDX Portal allows Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) agencies to pass local security credentials and roles into the enterprise. The portal also includes CDX FindIt!, a best-of-breed data discovery application that allows users to search, sort and discover records enterprise-wide.

"In this era of an ever-expanding information glut, timely information sharing is critical to improving operational effectiveness both within an enterprise and across organizations," said SRA Senior Vice President of Offerings and Products Pat Burke.  "The need to enhance data quality through the use of structured engineering processes and tools like PDSG's CDX is key to architecting and executing the mapping, extraction, transformation, and loading routines associated with data exchanges. We look forward to leveraging PDSG's CDX to make our solutions more powerful, and easier to scale and maintain as needed," said Burke.

About Patriot Scientific Corporation

Headquartered in Carlsbad, California, Patriot Scientific Corporation (PTSC) provides data sharing and secure data solutions for a connected world. These activities are funded with revenues generated, in a large part, from the Moore Microprocessor Patent™ Portfolio.  For more information on Patriot Scientific Corporation, visit: www.ptsc.com.  

About Patriot Data Solutions Group

Patriot Data Solutions Group, Inc. ("PDSG") provides products and solutions that enable mission-critical applications to significantly accelerate the time to value and reduce total cost of ownership for their data-sharing initiatives.  The company's flagship product, the Crossflo DataExchange® solution, helps link systems together and facilitates secure data sharing for any information exchange initiative in the public safety and criminal justice markets.  The solution has been designed to work directly with a number of national data sharing standards, including NIEM (National Information Exchange Model), and the Global Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM) and HL7 (Health Level 7). PDSG also offers Vigilys, a software product that leverages data accessed by CDX and provides a shared, map-based, common operating picture that allows field based first responders and office based emergency managers the ability to visualize incident responses and collaborate in real-time. PDSG's technological innovation is backed by subject matter expertise and proven methodologies, facilitating the rapid exchange of actionable data in mission-critical applications such as clinical quality improvement and emergency services response management.

PDSG has been working with some of the nation's earliest and most innovative data exchange projects including one of the most advanced statewide data-sharing initiatives to be deployed in the United States.  PDSG is the data-sharing group of Patriot Scientific Corporation, which is headquartered in Carlsbad, California (OTC BB:PTSC). For more information on Patriot Data Solutions Group, visit www.pdsg.com.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this news release looking forward in time involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks associated with the effect of changing economic conditions, trends in the products markets, variations in the company's cash flow, market acceptance risks, patent litigation, technical development risks, seasonality and other risk factors detailed in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Contact:
 
Patriot Investor Relations
 
ir@ptsc.com
 
760-547-2700 ext. 102
 



Read more: www.nasdaq.com/aspx/...0PR_NEWS_USPRX____LA38494#ixzz0uP8zorPn

bin immernoch dabei und warte....

Viele Grüße Abenteurer

wo warst du so lange ?