weil es der Umwelt schade und um die Infrastruktur zu erhalten. Er sagte wörtlich:
"We didn’t go after oil wells, actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls, because we didn’t want to do environmental damage, and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure."
Zitiert nach ZH, www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-29/...-obama-has-not-attacked-isis-oil
Dabei ist bekannt, dass sich der IS vor allem über illegale Ölexporte finanziert, die er über Bilal Erdogan, den Sohn des türkischen Präsidenten, u. a. in Richtung Asien verschachert - siehe # 809: www.ariva.de/forum/...SA-Baeren-Thread-283343?page=4832#jumppos120809
Da die Russen bis vor kurzem die Einzigen waren, die auch die Ölinfrastruktur des IS attackierten, könnte der Abschuss des russischen Bombers ein Racheakt Erdogans gewesen sein - dafür, dass Putin seinem Sohn die Geschäfte versaut, siehe # 806: www.ariva.de/forum/...SA-Baeren-Thread-283343?page=4832#jumppos120806
Der IS selbst rächte sich an den Russen mit der Bombe im russischen Touristen-Airbus, der in Ägypten abstürzte
Warum war USA bei der Zerstörung der Ölinfrastruktur bislang so halbherzig? Hier die Antwort aus obigem ZH-Link:
... PBS' Charlie Rose on Tuesday... pointed out that before the terrorist attacks in Paris, the U.S. had not bombed ISIS-controlled oil tankers, to which the former CIA deputy director Michael Morell responded that Barack Obama didn’t order the bombing of ISIS’s oil transportation infrastructure [siehe Obama-Zitat oben] until recently because he was concerned about environmental damage....
...Morell continued "Prior to Paris, there seemed to be a judgment that … look, we don’t want to destroy these oil tankers because that’s infrastructure that’s going to be necessary to support the people when ISIS isn’t there anymore, and it’s going to create environmental damage. And we didn’t go after oil wells - actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls because we didn’t want to do environmental damage and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure, right.”
Then we started asking questions, others joined in, and everything changed: "So now we’re hitting oil in trucks and maybe you get to the point where you say we also have to hit oil wells. So those are the kind of tough decisions you have to make."
...the real reasons behind ISIS massive wealth build up: the illicit oil trade facilitated by, and involving NATO-member state Turkey, whose president and his son collect billions in illegal profits by arranging the charter of Islamic State oil to Israel and other international buyers of ISIS' cheap oil, and which involves such "highly respected" commodity traders as Trafigura and Vitol, continues to this day, and only Putin has done anything to put a dent in it.
"We didn’t go after oil wells, actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls, because we didn’t want to do environmental damage, and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure."
Zitiert nach ZH, www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-29/...-obama-has-not-attacked-isis-oil
Dabei ist bekannt, dass sich der IS vor allem über illegale Ölexporte finanziert, die er über Bilal Erdogan, den Sohn des türkischen Präsidenten, u. a. in Richtung Asien verschachert - siehe # 809: www.ariva.de/forum/...SA-Baeren-Thread-283343?page=4832#jumppos120809
Da die Russen bis vor kurzem die Einzigen waren, die auch die Ölinfrastruktur des IS attackierten, könnte der Abschuss des russischen Bombers ein Racheakt Erdogans gewesen sein - dafür, dass Putin seinem Sohn die Geschäfte versaut, siehe # 806: www.ariva.de/forum/...SA-Baeren-Thread-283343?page=4832#jumppos120806
Der IS selbst rächte sich an den Russen mit der Bombe im russischen Touristen-Airbus, der in Ägypten abstürzte
Warum war USA bei der Zerstörung der Ölinfrastruktur bislang so halbherzig? Hier die Antwort aus obigem ZH-Link:
... PBS' Charlie Rose on Tuesday... pointed out that before the terrorist attacks in Paris, the U.S. had not bombed ISIS-controlled oil tankers, to which the former CIA deputy director Michael Morell responded that Barack Obama didn’t order the bombing of ISIS’s oil transportation infrastructure [siehe Obama-Zitat oben] until recently because he was concerned about environmental damage....
...Morell continued "Prior to Paris, there seemed to be a judgment that … look, we don’t want to destroy these oil tankers because that’s infrastructure that’s going to be necessary to support the people when ISIS isn’t there anymore, and it’s going to create environmental damage. And we didn’t go after oil wells - actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls because we didn’t want to do environmental damage and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure, right.”
Then we started asking questions, others joined in, and everything changed: "So now we’re hitting oil in trucks and maybe you get to the point where you say we also have to hit oil wells. So those are the kind of tough decisions you have to make."
...the real reasons behind ISIS massive wealth build up: the illicit oil trade facilitated by, and involving NATO-member state Turkey, whose president and his son collect billions in illegal profits by arranging the charter of Islamic State oil to Israel and other international buyers of ISIS' cheap oil, and which involves such "highly respected" commodity traders as Trafigura and Vitol, continues to this day, and only Putin has done anything to put a dent in it.
