Kakophonie unter der Regierungen der Eurozone wieder zulegt. Der Euro steigt sonst in ungesunde Höhen:
xi.onvista.de/...URR_FROM=EUR&CURR_TO=USD&QUALITY=RLT" style="max-width:560px" />


|
Kakophonie unter der Regierungen der Eurozone wieder zulegt. Der Euro steigt sonst in ungesunde Höhen:
xi.onvista.de/...URR_FROM=EUR&CURR_TO=USD&QUALITY=RLT" style="max-width:560px" />


Quelle: David Rosenberg, Breakfast with Dave v. 17.1.11
U.S. CONSUMER HITTING AN AIR POCKET?
Well, that January consumer sentiment number was nothing to write home about. The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index sagged to 72.7 from 74.5 in December and is a good 20 points shy of the level that in the past typified an overall economic expansion. Sadly for those expecting a job market bounce in January, not only are initial jobless claims now back on the rise but the University of Michigan index of ‘facts-on-the-ground’ current conditions sank from 85.3 to 79.8 in January, a three-month low and the steepest decline since last July when double-dip was the flavour du jour. Buying conditions for large household goods slumped to 129 from 140 ― auto buying plans fell to a three-month low.
Beneath the veneer of all the enthusiasm is the reality that real organic incomes are under pressure. So with that energy-induced 0.5% MoM hike in the December U.S. CPI, real wages contracted 0.4% and are down now in three of the past four months. The pace over the past six months is now running just 15 basis points north of zero ― well below the 3.6% trend in mid-2010. The three-month trend, which was more than 5% at an annual rate back in mid-2010, has since swung to a -0.5% annualized pace.
The added hurdle is that, according to the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment survey, household income expectations for the year ahead collapsed nine points in January to an 11-month low of 116. That is in nominal terms. The real story was the similar-sized slide in “real” income expectations from 64 to 55, which puts this index at the third lowest level on record (going back nearly 60 years) ― only lower in the severe 1980 and 2008 recessions.
So all of a sudden we are starting to see the U.S. consumer waver just a touch. Retail sales came in a tad below expected at +0.6% MoM in December and this headline was indeed exaggerated because the “core control” number (the one that goes into the consumer spending segment of the GDP data, which excludes gas, autos, and building materials) was only up 0.2%, quite a break from the +0.6% average over the prior three months. Adjusted for inflation, the real spending data are now showing signs of either stagnation or mild contraction. We would have to say that it is now abundantly clear that November holiday sales “stole” activity from December. How else would you explain why clothing sales fell 0.2%, electronics sagged 0.6%, and department stores plunged 1.9% and were down in three of the past four months.
MARKET MUSINGS & DATA DECIPHERING
Breakfast with Dave
SQUARING THE ROUND TABLE
The Barron’s Roundtable was even more raucous than usual and there were
some truly remarkable comments that need reprinting:
Felix Zulauf: “You also have a tremendous social division. In the U.S., the top
20% of the population owns 93% of the financial assets. That tells you the
average guy is in bad shape. He spends what he makes, and at the end of the
month he’s even."
Fred Hickey added to that sentiment: “Last August, things weren’t looking so
well. Then Ben Bernanke gave a speech in Jackson Hole that implied the Fed
would engage in quantitative easing, and from that point forward, the Dow
added 1,400 points. Gasoline prices went from $2.65 a gallon to well over
$3.00. a $50 billion hit to consumers. Food prices rose to record levels. It
caused a major imbalance in the economy. If you own financial assets, you’re
doing quite well. If you don’t, you’re getting hit by higher food prices, higher
insurance costs, higher everything, and you’re not getting any interest on your
savings... The economy has structural problems and we aren’t dealing with
them. Money-printing won’t work, yet that’s the prescription we continue to give
the patient. If the Fed keeps printing after June we’ll have higher gasoline and
food prices and more imbalances until this ends. And at some point, it will end,
because the dollar will fall apart. What we are doing now makes everything
appear rosy. But it is devastatingly terrible policy for the long-term.”
Geez, where have you heard that before. Hope Fred isn’t getting any hate mail.
Marc Faber: “If you measure the stock market not in dollars but gold, it is down
80% since 1999. I no longer regard the U.S. dollar as a valid unit of account.
People shouldn’t value their wealth in dollars because one day, in dollars,
everyone will be a billionaire."
That zinger is too good.
Bill Gross one-upped that one: “We are looking at a currency that almost
certainly will depreciate relative to other, stronger currencies in developing
countries that have lower levels of debt and higher growth potential. And, on
the short end of the yield curve, we are looking at creditors receiving negative
real interest rates for a long, long time. That, in effect, is a default. Ultimately,
creditors and investors are at the behest of a central bank and policymakers
that will rob them of their money.”
As for the market action for 2011, we have two giants in our camp.
Zulauf: “The market will range between 10% up and 10% down.”
Faber: “I expect to see the market move up and down at least 20% this year, as
it did in 2010.”
The case for classic long-short hedge fund strategies is compelling if these two
pundits are anywhere close to being right.
Jimmy Rogers wasn’t on the roundtable but in a separate interview with
Bloomberg, he may well have had the best quote of the past decade:
“Paper money is made of cotton, and I’m long cotton, by the way. One reason
I’m long cotton is because Dr. Bernanke is out there running the printing
presses as fast as he can.”
How great is that, short the U.S. dollar and go long cotton.
Another non-roundtable member that had a quote worth mentioning over the
weekend was Christina Romer in her Economic View piece on page 5 of the
Sunday NYT biz section (titled What Obama Should Say About the Deficit). Talk
about brutal honesty:
“President Obama needs to explain that while these cuts will be painful, there is
no way to solve our problems without shared sacrifice.”
“Shared sacrifice”. Wow. For a nation that sent kids overseas to fight wars
against terror states while cutting taxes here at home to stimulate consumption
of iPads and diamond necklaces. A nation so fearful of a “double dip’ that it
raided Social Security to keep the retailer cash registers ringing for the New
Year.
So what Ms. Romer had to say about the need to stop the excessive borrowing
madness. The U.S. government now spends 1.6 for every one dollar it brings in
with respect to revenues. was telling: “Even with bold spending cuts, there will
still be a large deficit. The only realistic way to close the gap is by raising
revenues. Some of it can and should come from higher taxes on the rich. But
because there are far more middle-class families than wealthy ones, much of
the additional money will have to come from ordinary people.”
The era of spending-beyond-our means denial is on its last legs.
TIME TO FADE THE MUNI HYPE
There is a clear buyers’ strike in the market for state and local government debt
that is largely based on fear and misperception. The mass selling of muni’s,
which represent the bedrock of the U.S. economy, is incredible. nine
consecutive weeks of net redemptions totalling $16.5 billion ($1.5 billion in the
January 15 week). Talk about fertile ground for a huge long-term buying
opportunity.
First, even if you buy into the default talk, look at the yield protection you get
now. There are some long-term muni’s trading north of eight percent. even
higher than junk bonds (a premium of over 100bps!). Long-term AAA-rated
muni’s are now trading well north of five percent or 116% vis-a-vis Treasury
bonds (typically, muni bond yields are equivalent to 82% of Treasury yields given
their tax advantage). California off-the-run 30-year 6% bonds are now being
quoted at a yield premium to dollar-denominated debts offered by the likes of
Mexico and Columbia.
Give me a giant break.
Even in California, only teachers come in front of bond holders. In other states,
the debt holders are the first to get paid. It’s amazing how few people know
that.
The spurious reasons beyond default concerns is that the lower levels of
government are saddled with a huge supply calendar (partly because of the
expiration of the federal Buy America Bonds subsidy). But in truth, new issuance
this year at an estimated $350 billion is lower than the $439 billion in 2010.
If we are talking about looking for what is S.I.R.P.-like (safety and income at a
reasonable price), investors should screen for:
Regions with a manageable refinancing calendar, A or better credit rating, low
levels of foreclosure rates and excess housing inventory, low unfunded pension
obligations, and growing population bases. And best to concentrate on bonds
backed by a non-cyclical revenue stream like water and power.
And have a read of Older Workers Are Keeping a Tighter Grip on Jobs on page
B3 of the Saturday NYT. As we have long argued, the prime reason for this
phenomena is that the boomers increasingly need income as an antidote to this
last decade of lost wealth. And right now, in the muni space, we may well have
the most compelling opportunity to add income to portfolios since the rapid
meltup in corporate bond yields in late 2008...
MORE ON THE DEBT CEILING ISSUE
The weekend FT had a very good take on the issue on page 15 (Talk is Cheaper
Than Money in Battle to Bring Down Ceiling). Usually, passing the debt ceiling is
a purely perfunctory exercise. occurring 80 times in the past 70 years. The Tea
Party is not going to give in at all and the fiscal hawks in the GOP are looking for
$50 billion of spending cuts out of the White House. And according to the latest
Reuters poll, 71% of Americans oppose lifting the debt ceiling too. Now Mr.
Geithner does have a slate of funding alternatives like Bob Rubin had at his
disposal back in 1996 that did not technically breach the ceiling. imagine that
back then the limit was $104 billion, not $14.3 trillion. This is now page 15
news. By March it will be front-page news. It promises to be a distraction for
investors (one that compresses the P/E multiple) and a disruption for the
economy.
And what can President Obama really say in his defense. Back in 2006, as
Senator he went on record actually resisting support for a raise in the debt
ceiling proposed by George Bush 43. To wit:
“Leadership means the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the
burden of hard choices today on to the backs of our children and grandchildren.
America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.”
Absolutely incredible. And the debt bill has surged $3.5 trillion since the “Big O”
(make that Owe) took office in early 2009.
For those that see the debt ceiling file as a non-issue, think again. Back in
1996, when it was more of a non-issue, the yield on the 10-year Treasury-note
spiked nearly 100bps, and if memory serves us correctly, it was the first time we
saw a major credit agency (Moody’s) put the U.S. government on review for a
possible downgrade (and the agency has recently been issuing some other
warnings). It’s safe to say that back in 1996, the U.S.A. was not the same fiscal
basket case it is today.
THE FED REALLY MISSED THE BOAT
It is incredible that the investment class is putting its faith in the same
institution that totally blew the housing meltdown. see Fed Misread Dangers of
Housing Crash, Minutes Show on page 2 of the weekend FT. The 2005 set of
transcripts from the FOMC meetings that year were just released and reveal a
central bank that was clearly in denial. The Fed staff economist, at the time,
David Stockton, said at the June meeting that “our story basically is that we’re
basically worried about valuations in the housing market, but we don’t
necessarily see that as having profound consequences for our policy going
forward”.
Mike Moskow, the Chicago Fed President back then, added “in the event of a
sharp drop in housing prices, the odds of a spillover to financial institutions
seems limited”.
Oh well, nobody’s perfect.
Wie in jedem Jahr treffen wir uns Anfang Januar zur Jahreshauptversammlung unseres Karpfenzuchtverein. In diesem Jahr am 21. Januar. Seit Jahren sacken die Börsen pünktlich zu diesem Termin ab. Eine große Menge Geld wird vernichtet und veschwindet im Schlund dieses Burschen:view.stern.de/de/picture/1531836/...-Braun-Animal-510x510.jpg" style="max-width:560px" />
Permanent
weil eh schon Rohstoff-Inflation besteht:
Ben Bernanke’s QE program may well have induced a nice positive equity wealth
effect but by inducing investment flows into all asset classes, food inflation has
emerged, along with energy, as a potential source of global economic weakness
and strife as prices soar in China and India and riots start to break out in Africa.
Gold is rallying today though the chart does look quite choppy and sloppy right
now — while we remain long-term bulls, one must wonder if things are starting to
become a little nutty when you read stories (as we did this morning on
Bloomberg News) that vending machines selling bullion are starting to be
installed in Japan.
As we said before, movements in oil prices still exert a statistically significant
impact on the economy and earnings with a 12-24 month lag. In other words,
growth was still receiving a tailwind from the sharp downdraft in crude prices
experienced from mid-2008 to early 2009 right through last year. But the gig is
up and the economy is going to feel the effects of the near-120% surge in oil
prices for the balance of 2011 and into 2012 barring a reversal. Only once in
the past did the U.S. economy fail to sputter or head into outright recession after
such a two-year surge in oil prices (food will only make matters worse in terms of
depressing real wages) and that was in 2006 when the economy generated over
two million jobs, the unemployment rate was 4.5%, wages were rising at a 6%
annual rate, home prices rose an average of 8%, and bank credit expanded
10%. Those offsets are not in play this year.
And the question is whether the Fed would dare embark on QE3 with headline
inflation in acceleration mode (even if core is still well contained). It’s one thing
to bring on QE1 when oil prices are at $45/bbl and the CRB spot index is sitting
at 325 (futures at 215) as was the case in March 2009. And then to announce
QE2 nearly 18 months later when oil is sitting at $75/bbl and the CRB is sitting
at 380 (futures were at 270). But can the Fed really be serious about yet
another round of balance sheet expansion to please the stock market when oil
is now above $90/bbl and the CRB is at a record high of over 530 (futures now
north of 330)? Talk about rolling the dice with the bond market vigilantes.
Also, have a look at The Latest American Export: Inflation in the op-ed pages
(A17 to be precise) of the WSJ. Indeed, not only has the Fed managed to create
an illusion of prosperity by stepping up the print press and swinging the stock
market around with QE2 chatter last summer, but now it is actually helping the
government cause a de facto real appreciation of the yuan by pursing a back-
door policy of boosting inflation in China. Bernanke is a true magician, no
question about it.
Then again, the name of the game seems to be to kick the can down the road as
far as it will go, buy as much time as possible, and hope that the economy can
manage to grow out of all its imbalances from bad debt elimination, excess
supply of housing, and pregnant government balance sheets. Bringing back
mark-to-model accounting in the banking sector was the first move. Using TARP
money as an industrial bailout strategy was next and right out of the 1930s FDR
playbook. Goosing the fiscal system and adding to a deficit that was already
running at nearly 10% of GDP was another, including a raid of Social Security
and not allowing a 10-year tax cut to expire that was always destined to do so (a
tax cut that was implemented to deal with the 2001 tech-wreck recession, not
the 2010 stuck-in-the-mud recovery). The Fed was going to start shrinking its
balance sheet a year ago, but instead re-expanded it by the end of the summer
and is now thumbing the nose of the new Congress by hinting at doing even
more to keep the speculative stock market rally alive. And the ballyhooed
financial overhaul continues to miss deadlines and in fact has no teeth as it is —
why cook the goose that lays the golden credit egg and must play a role in a
leveraged economic expansion?
The complexity in the banking system remains as opaque as ever and now the
lenders are generating profits by drawing on their loan loss reserves (Banken-
Gewinne stammen aus Senkung der Risikovorsorge, obwohl dazu kein Anlass besteht)
at a time when the unemployment rate is still perilously close to double-digits. The can
has indeed been kicked down the road. Outside of selected state legislatures
(see what Vallejo is doing to pension and benefits on page A6 of the WSJ), the
tough decisions have been delayed and as a result, the next bear market and
recession may end up looking just as bad as the last one. The only thing we
seemed to have learned coming out of the credit bubble was to add even more
debt to the overall national balance sheet. But as we saw in Ireland, not even
the lucky can expand its debt at a faster rate than nominal income forever,
especially now that the ratio in the U.S.A. is heading to unprecedented heights
for a peace-time economy and to levels that end up impairing growth in the
nation’s private sector capital stock. Borrowed time, that’s what the bulls have
on their side. But we’ll see for how much longer, especially as the debt ceiling
file plays out (see New Calls on GOP Side Not to Lift Debt Limit on page A8 of the
WSJ).
With portfolio managers cash ratios back close to levels that they were at in the
fall of 2007 and still just a trickle of inflows into mutual funds, the only source of
buying power we can see in the equity market is leverage (the surge in margin
borrowing) and massive short covering (short interest on the NYSE plunged 5.5%
in the second half of December, which largely explains why the stock market
absolutely rocketed during the month). If you want to have a good look at the
consensus view see the editorial by BlackRock’s Bob Doll on page 22 of the FT
(Prepare for Another Fine Surprise from U.S. Equities). Bob and I part ways on
the outlook but we are old friends and collegues and he is still worth listening to.
HEADWINDS AHEAD
It is truly difficult to understand why it is that everyone is so whipped up about
U.S. growth prospects. Even the latest set of data points has been less than
exciting. Retail sales, payrolls, and consumer confidence have all been below
expected and all of a sudden we see that jobless claims are moving back up.
The deceleration in core capex orders is quite telling and housing remains firmly
in the doldrums. To be sure, we have a slate of “diffusion” surveys telling us
that businesses are feeling better — the ISMs, the IBD/TIPP survey, the NFIB and
the array of regional manufacturing surveys too, but over 70% of the U.S. GDP is
the consumer and we did seem to close out 2010 with real spending and wages
roughly flat. Is that good? Or perhaps there is now this widespread belief that
the government will stop at nothing to achieve the holy grail of sustainable
economic growth and revived animal spirits among the investing class. The Fed
has made it quite clear that the road to prosperity lies through the equity
market, and that the primary objective of quantitative easing was to generate a
positive equity wealth effect on consumer and business spending. So far, the
stock market is biting because the rally has been non-stop in nature for months
now and whatever givebacks we see are brief affairs and widely treated as
buying opportunities. Hope springs eternal, so much so, that even soft
economic data like we saw last Friday are treated with little more than a shrug of
the shoulder.
The S&P 500 may still be some 17% away from its prior peak, but the Wilshire
5000 just closed at a new high after last week’s 1.8% advance, and in the short
span of just 22 months, has managed to double (+100%). In other words, from
the March 2009 lows, $8.3 trillion of paper wealth has been created. Thanks
Ben! The S&P 400 midcap index is at a new high too, as is the Wilshire small-
cap index, piercing its old high set back on July 13, 2007.
The Dow has now gained ground in each of the past seven weeks. The last time
it did that was back in the week ending April 23, 2010. Ahem. A month later, it
was down 1,200 points. You see, nothing lasts forever, not even a speculative
bounce. The Shiller cyclically-adjusted P/E ratio has expanded for six months in
a row and at 23.3x in January is now at its highest level in nearly three years.
Sentiment is wildly bullish. The market is seriously overbought, and it is
expensive on a “normalized” earnings basis.
In any event, as we look to the months and quarters ahead, what do we see?
We see that the Federal government just announced a bonanza of $858 billion
of stimulus measures towards the end of last year. Of course, almost all of that
just ensures that Washington will not be a source of contraction this year, but
the psychological impact has been huge so far. The Fed has allowed its balance
sheet to explode even further to obscene levels of $2.43 trillion or triple what it
was before the financial crisis took hold. In the past three years, the Fed’s
balance sheet has expanded by $1.5 trillion and nominal GDP has only
managed to rise over $500 billion. [schwache Effizienz! - A.L.] Fascinating. And we hadthe U.S. public
debt explode by $5 trillion over that same time frame — the country is 244 years
old and over one-third of the national debt has been created in just the past.
Aus seinem Newsletter v. 18.1.11
Tschuldigung.
Ich muss korrigieren:
"Die Marke von 736 wurde dreimal (2x 2008, Anfang 2010) fakemäßig nach oben gebrochen, bevor es eine mehr oder weniger starke Korrektur/Absturz nach unten gab."
Daher aktuelles Russel2000 Kursziel auf Sicht von 1-2Monaten: 736 Punkte!
Da freuen sich die Bären.

|
| Wertung | Antworten | Thema | Verfasser | letzter Verfasser | letzter Beitrag | |
| 29 | 3.798 | Banken & Finanzen in unserer Weltzone | lars_3 | youmake222 | 20.01.26 19:26 | |
| 469 | 156.450 | Der USA Bären-Thread | Anti Lemming | ARIVA.DE | 17.01.26 12:01 | |
| 56 | PROLOGIS SBI (WKN: 892900) / NYSE | 0815ax | Lesanto | 06.01.26 14:14 | ||
| Daytrading 15.05.2024 | ARIVA.DE | 15.05.24 00:02 | ||||
| Daytrading 14.05.2024 | ARIVA.DE | 14.05.24 00:02 |