Zurück
investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=68884457
Implicit in killing off Equity was that they intended to gift Newco to the Insider Trading SETTLEMENT Note Holders.
It must be remembered that some of the Insider Trading Crooks DIRECTLY negotiated with JPMC, gifting away (or "horse-trading" as they colloquially like to refer to it - some might call it WHORES TRADING), WMI assets. Think Anchor Savings Goodwill Litigation, for example, treating these assets as if they were their own, because in a sense, WMI allowed these assets to belong to favored Creditors, instead of going to Equity as should have been the case.
But then, what would you expect when you have the Insider Trading Hedge Funds directly negotiating a POR (and when you have "OUR ATTORNEY representing "OUR INTERESTS" giving these Criminals the ol' okey-dokey)? Do you for one minute think that they gave a damn about Equity?! Do you think that they would have ethical problems with stealing a company, when doing so would allow them to return a few extra percentage points to their Hedge Fund clients, clients that are used to seing these people constantly rape shareholders out of their own assets?
The only thought that they gave to Equity was how to give Equity the finger, how to bludgeon it, how to set it on fire, how to decapitate it, how to p!ss on the ashes, how to . . . you get the point.
If even one dollar were left to Equity, the Insider Trading Crooks' scam would have been exposed, and they could not have pulled off this bank heist (pardon the pun).
Recall, if you will, Brian RosenRAT's first POR that allowed Class 16 Investors to accept equity in the New Company, BUT, ONLY IF they held a million or more H shares. Ummm, let me think for a minute, who might that include? Ummm, perhaps the Insider Trading SETTLEMENT Note Holders that helped concoct these schemes, these scams, these thefts?
Maybe it was a mere oversight that very few individual investors (think ZERO), would have had a chance to participate in the Newest K-Mart in town. That way, they would keep the number of shareholders under 300, and would therefore, be exempt from filing any SEC Reports to let Wall Street know about the GRAND THEFT that had been committed in Walrath's courtroom.
These guys are good (in the sense that they are crafty, devious, deceptive, crooked, coniving, disingenuous . . .); that kind of "good." Good, as in "boy, that guy is a 'good' murderer, or good, as in "man, I can't believe how 'good' that guy is at raping people."
Not good as in "good," but good as in being horrible excuses for human beings. "Good," as in, "he is a 'good' candidate for burning in Hell for eternity." That kind of good.
So, yeah, it may be circumstantial evidence, but oftentimes, that is much better than direct evidence, as you see the pieces that they didn't intend for most to witness directly. These are the pieces that they didn't think would ever be seen, or that people would ever put 2 and 2 together. This is akin to Richard Nixon's burglary at Watergate, and his subsequent attempt to lie and cover-up, and to try to hide his way out of it. The problem with 3rd rate criminals is that they figure out ways to hide a lot of things, but they can never completely hide everything.
And we are slowly undercovering this Criminal Enterprise's Delawarian version of their own personal Watergate.
Thank you, RosenRAT!
Sincerely,
Up yours.
Implicit in killing off Equity was that they intended to gift Newco to the Insider Trading SETTLEMENT Note Holders.
It must be remembered that some of the Insider Trading Crooks DIRECTLY negotiated with JPMC, gifting away (or "horse-trading" as they colloquially like to refer to it - some might call it WHORES TRADING), WMI assets. Think Anchor Savings Goodwill Litigation, for example, treating these assets as if they were their own, because in a sense, WMI allowed these assets to belong to favored Creditors, instead of going to Equity as should have been the case.
But then, what would you expect when you have the Insider Trading Hedge Funds directly negotiating a POR (and when you have "OUR ATTORNEY representing "OUR INTERESTS" giving these Criminals the ol' okey-dokey)? Do you for one minute think that they gave a damn about Equity?! Do you think that they would have ethical problems with stealing a company, when doing so would allow them to return a few extra percentage points to their Hedge Fund clients, clients that are used to seing these people constantly rape shareholders out of their own assets?
The only thought that they gave to Equity was how to give Equity the finger, how to bludgeon it, how to set it on fire, how to decapitate it, how to p!ss on the ashes, how to . . . you get the point.
If even one dollar were left to Equity, the Insider Trading Crooks' scam would have been exposed, and they could not have pulled off this bank heist (pardon the pun).
Recall, if you will, Brian RosenRAT's first POR that allowed Class 16 Investors to accept equity in the New Company, BUT, ONLY IF they held a million or more H shares. Ummm, let me think for a minute, who might that include? Ummm, perhaps the Insider Trading SETTLEMENT Note Holders that helped concoct these schemes, these scams, these thefts?
Maybe it was a mere oversight that very few individual investors (think ZERO), would have had a chance to participate in the Newest K-Mart in town. That way, they would keep the number of shareholders under 300, and would therefore, be exempt from filing any SEC Reports to let Wall Street know about the GRAND THEFT that had been committed in Walrath's courtroom.
These guys are good (in the sense that they are crafty, devious, deceptive, crooked, coniving, disingenuous . . .); that kind of "good." Good, as in "boy, that guy is a 'good' murderer, or good, as in "man, I can't believe how 'good' that guy is at raping people."
Not good as in "good," but good as in being horrible excuses for human beings. "Good," as in, "he is a 'good' candidate for burning in Hell for eternity." That kind of good.
So, yeah, it may be circumstantial evidence, but oftentimes, that is much better than direct evidence, as you see the pieces that they didn't intend for most to witness directly. These are the pieces that they didn't think would ever be seen, or that people would ever put 2 and 2 together. This is akin to Richard Nixon's burglary at Watergate, and his subsequent attempt to lie and cover-up, and to try to hide his way out of it. The problem with 3rd rate criminals is that they figure out ways to hide a lot of things, but they can never completely hide everything.
And we are slowly undercovering this Criminal Enterprise's Delawarian version of their own personal Watergate.
Thank you, RosenRAT!
Sincerely,
Up yours.
