Wamu WKN 893906 News !

Wer andern in die Möse beißt, ist böse meist.

wie wäre es denn mal mit dem link für uns alle!?

gruß  :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WspCaITOXY&NR=1&feature=fvwp

Time & Sales  
Price Size    Exch Time
 0.0535 18000    OTO 10:10:03
 0.0531 180    OTO 10:09:43
 0.0531 5000    OTO 10:04:49
 0.0559 500    OTO 10:01:32
 0.0531 275    OTO 10:00:01
 0.0532 200    OTO 09:56:03<---------------------------------- hier
 0.056 5000    OTO 09:51:13
 0.056 4993    OTO 09:48:50
 0.0558 5000    OTO 09:47:02
 0.053 2000    OTO 09:46:46
 0.054 496    OTO 09:40:42
 0.054 6260    OTO 09:40:37
 0.054 250    OTO 09:39:06
 0.054 200000    OTO 09:37:13
 0.053 2900    OTO 09:36:04
 0.053 7100    OTO 09:36:03
 0.054 100000    OTO 09:35:28
 0.0545 2575    OTO 09:33:33
 0.054 10000    OTO 09:32:42
 0.054 2060    OTO 09:31:39
 0.054 115    OTO 09:31:38
 0.054 250    OTO 09:31:38
 0.054 900    OTO 09:31:12
 0.054 9100    OTO 09:31:12
 0.054 1000    OTO 09:30:21
 0.054 1000    OTO 09:30:20
 0.0545 5000    OTO 09:30:08
 0.0545 18576    OTO 09:30:08
 0.0545 65090    OTO 09:30:06
 0.054 14610    OTO 09:30:06

Meinst Du nicht selber langsam, dass das Alles nur Teilausführungen sind?

ich fand das obige Post 156589 auch witzig !
lacht mal herzhaft verringert die Wartezeit aufs große Geld
und davon bin ich überzeugt

... nach wie vor für Rückabwicklung, ach Susman wirds schon machen !

bibt es auf(!) der bank, aber nicht von(!) der bank.

die werden vorher alles und jeden bestechen, bevor so ein betrug an die "öffentlichkeit" kommt. mafiamethoden eben!

The Company’s primary executive and business segment headquarters are  located at 1301 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. In March 2006,  Second and Union LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Washington Mutual,  Inc., in a joint venture with the Seattle Art Museum, completed  construction of this headquarters building and was granted an initial  certificate of occupancy. At that time, Second and Union LLC took  ownership of a condominium interest in the 944,000 square foot office  tower and the attached 700 stall parking garage and the Company’s  employees began to relocate to the new space. Concurrently, the Seattle  Art Museum completed and took ownership of 243,000 square feet of future  expansion space that Second and Union LLC leased, and the Company’s  employees will occupy, for a period of up to 25 years. The Seattle Art  Museum has the right to cancel the lease, in whole or in part, at any  time after the tenth year of the lease. Certain leases covering downtown  Seattle locations were not renewed when their terms expired and the  majority of those occupants have relocated to the new headquarters  space. The Company leases an additional 466,000 square feet in other  downtown Seattle locations for administrative functions.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company’s owned and leased property in 36  states is comprised of 2,225 retail banking stores, 472 lending stores  and centers and 325 administrative and other offices. Administrative  facilities involve the ownership or leasing of approximately 2.0 million  square feet in California, 1.2 million square feet in Texas, 922,000  square feet in Florida and 489,000 square feet in Illinois.

messages.finance.yahoo.com/...f=2&rt=2&frt=2&off=1

......die sich drum, das das an die Öffentlichkeit und an die richtigen Leute weitergeleitet wird?

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Joe Schorp
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000001.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Robert Barnhart
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000002.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Stephen Slinsky
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000003.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Paul Person
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000004.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by James R. Smith
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000005.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Joe Salas
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000006.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Unknown Stockholder
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000007.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Kenneth Walker
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000008.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Wendy Gilmore
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000009.pdf

Objection to Motion of Debtors for an Order, Pursuant to Sections 105, 502, 1125, 1126, and 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 3003, 3017, 3018 and 3020, (I) Approving the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement and the Form and Manner of the Notice of the Proposed Supplemental Disclosure Statement Hearing, (II) Establishing Solicitation and Voting Procedures, (III) Scheduling A Confirmation Hearing, and (IV) Establishing Notice and Objection Procedures for Confirmation of the Debtors' Modified Plan Filed by Bryce Verna www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000010.pdf

Notice of Transfer for Equity Trust Co Custodian FBO Acct. No. 73916 re: Mario Antoci and Diane Antoci (Claim No. 2685)
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000011.pdf

Notice of Service of Discovery of Victoria A. Guilfoyle re: Responses and Objection of Aurelius Capital Management, LP to the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders' First Set of Requests for Admissions, Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110301000000000012.pdf

JPMorgan needs $4.5 billion to fight 10,000 legal actions

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011, 8:24 am

JPMorgan Chase (JPM: 45.9875 -1.50%) may need a legal cushion of $4.5 billion in excess of current levels to handle litigation and regulatory actions against the banking giant, the firm said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing.

At Dec. 31, some 10,000 legal actions are pending against the bank, JPMorgan said in a filing this week.

"The litigations range from individual actions involving a single plaintiff to class-action lawsuits with potentially millions of class members," according to the filing. "With some litigants still unknown and cases subject to change, the amount JPMorgan spends in excess of its 2010 legal budget could range from zero to $4.5 billion."

This week, JPMorgan, Bank of America (BAC: 14.065 -1.57%), Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC: 31.89 -1.15%) and Citigroup (C: 4.62 -1.28%) warned investors in securities filings that each faces an onslaught of consumer and investor lawsuits, not to mention regulatory actions. Many of the cases relate to mortgage-backed securities and the banks' handling of foreclosures.

JPMorgan noted some positive news in its recent 10-K filing, asserting that its provisions for credit losses fell by $15.4 billion. The drops are attributed to reductions in allowances for credit losses on mortgages and credit cards thanks to improved delinquency rates among borrowers in those segments.

At the same time, the bank said the decline in these provisions was offset by increased allowance for credit losses from the Washington Mutual credit-impaired loans portfolio JPMorgan acquired. The bank said the increase in credit losses to the WaMu segment is built on the expectation of future credit losses.

JPMorgan acquired Washington Mutual and its mortgage loan portfolio during the financial crisis in September 2008.

www.housingwire.com/2011/03/01/...to-fight-10000-legal-actions

Ich finde die doc's, die Pjöngjang mit o.g. post gestern eingestellt hat ziemlich interessant, warum kommt im folgenden ohne Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit, es sind nur ein paar Gedanken von mir dazu (zu dem, wie ich es verstanden habe).
www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110228000000000003.pdf
Das ist ein neues Confidential Agreement zw. den Settlement-Noteholders, Unsecured Creditors und dem EC. Es geht um die, vom EC geforderten Unterlagen, im Rahmen der Untersuchungen zum Insiderhandel, die als vertraulich, streng vertraulich oder noch vertraulicher (attorney's eyes only) einzustufen sind - hoffentlich fällt uns das nicht wieder auf die Füße, daß wir dann wieder doc's haben, die wir (EC) nicht verwenden dürfen, weil "under seal".... Ich hab zwar gelesen, das soll vor einem Insolvenzgericht so üblich sein, allerdings finde ich es nicht gerade beruhigend. Oder ist es tatsächlich so, das Susman/Nelson (EC) damit schonmal Material für ein trial sammeln, dort dürfte es ja wiederum verwendet werden. Vielleicht reicht es ja aber auch schon als Druckmittel, wie schon vielfach erwähnt, wir erfahren ja leider nicht, was tatsächlich passiert, uns bleibt nur die Spekulation.

Danit kommen wir zum nächsten doc, in dem informiert Fried Frank das Gericht darüber, daß sie seit dem 14.02.2011 nicht mehr die Vertretung für Aurelius haben.
Sie vertreten weiterhin Appaloosa, Centerbridge + Owl Creek - auch das gibt wieder Raum für Spekulationen, stellt sich doch die Frage, ist das schon eine Folge der Untersuchungen zum Insiderhandel, und ist es ein Zeichen dafür, daß sich die Hedgies auch nicht mehr ganz grün sind? Das wiederum würde ich als gutes Zeichen für uns werten, weil es meiner Meinung nach zeigt, daß es auch bei unserem Gegner  bröckelt, je enger es wird, und daß Susman/Nelsen (EC) offensichtlich doch an den richtigen Stellen graben. (ach so das doc: www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110228000000000004.pdf)

www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110228000000000005.pdf
Dieses doc beinhaltet die Antwort der Anwälte der Debtors (kurz Rosen) zur Anfrage von Joe Schorp zu den Eigentumsverhältnissen der Second + Union LLC, das doc dazu lag glaube ich letzte Woche auf dem Server und es ging meiner Meinung nach darum, das er anhand dieses Beispiels aufgezeigt hat, eigentlich überhaupt nicht geklärt ist, was nun wirklich alles an JPM "verklauft" wurde, also unser zentrales Problem. Allerdings ist Rosen der Meinung Mr. Schorp hätte die Fakten nicht verstanden und es gäbe keine Notwendigkeit wg. dieser Problematik ein hearing durchzuführen (wie alles aus dieser Richtung meiner Meinung nach mehr als überheblich, wie war das "Hochmut kommt vor dem Fall")
Es werden verschiedene Daten aufgeführt, an denen Aufstellungen zu assets + liabilities gemacht wurden, die dem Gericht vorliegen, allerdings erklärt das noch nicht die fehlende Aufstellung im P&A agreement. Selbstverständlich wird auch erklärt, das "natürlich" JPM der rechtmäßige Besitzer der Second & Union LLC sei, bewiesen ist es jedoch meiner Meinung nach trotz allem nicht und es stellt sich mal wieder die Frage, wessen Anwalt ist Rosen nun eigentlich - und das alles ohne Interssenkonflikt?

So, jetzt mach erstmal Pause.

Schönen Abend an alle.

LG E.

"
Meinst Du nicht selber langsam, dass das Alles nur Teilausführungen sind?
"

0.0559 500    OTO 10:01:32
0.0531 275    OTO 10:00:01
0.0532 200    OTO 09:56:03<---------------------------------- hier
0.056 5000    OTO 09:51:13
0.056 4993    OTO 09:48:50

lieber peter Pan

ach ja...

Wusste noch gar nicht das es Mischkurse an der Börse gibt...

Wenn das Teilausführugen sind...dann müsste doch zumindest der Preis für eine teilausgeführte order für alle Ausführungen gleich sein...und nicht mal gerade 200 Stück für den niedrigsten Preis!

und komischer weise immer schön mit solchen beträgen runter...

Gruß Orleon

A jailed former Societe Generale (SOGN.PA) trader convicted of theft of speed-trading computer code secrets was sentenced to 36 months in prison on Monday.

Samarth Agrawal, 27, a citizen of India, was convicted in November by a jury of stealing proprietary computer codes used in Societe Generale's high-frequency trading business and of interstate transportation of the stolen code.

U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff imposed the sentence on Agrawal.

Agrawal's lawyer Ivan Fisher had asked the judge to sentence his client to time served. Agrawal has been jailed since his arrest in April last year.

Fisher was not immediately available for comment.

Federal prosecutors had asked the judge to sentence Agrawal to between six years and eight years.

A Manhattan federal court jury took two hours to return a guilty verdict against Agrawal last November at a two-week trial during which he surprisingly admitted on the witness stand that it was wrong for him to have copied the French bank's code. [ID:nN19191422]

The jury heard that he planned to use the code to help build a high-frequency trading system at a new job with Tower Research Capital LLC hedge fund last April. FBI agents arrested him on the day he was supposed to start work at Tower.

High-frequency trading, or high-speed automated trading, has become an increasingly important and competitive business, generating millions in profits for banks and brokerages. The computer codes that help firms trade shares in milliseconds are closely guarded secrets.

The case is USA v Agrawal, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 10-417. (Reporting by Grant McCool and Soyoung Kim; Editing by Gary Hill)
www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/01/...ce-idUSN2828268520110301

dauert, desdo mehr kommt raus!


Also JPM und andere (Staats) Manipulatoren gebt uns unsere 30$

und wir werden euch       NOCH       nicht vernichten!!

vielen Dank für deine informative aufschlüssellung der doc´s.

echt prima !

würde micht freuen wenn das bei den wichtigen doc´s regelmäßig jemand aufschlüsseln könnte. den englischen jura kauderwelsch können wirklich nur die guru´s entziffern :-)

Grüße

Justinjan

INVESTMENT AGREEMENT

dated as of April 7, 2008

between

WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.

and

THE INVESTORS PARTY HERETO

contracts.onecle.com/wamu/tpg-investment-2008-04-07.shtml

www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/01/...chief-banks_n_829526.html

je älter, desto besser werden sie :-)

Falsch, nicht besser .... Reicher

Du weißt doch wie das geht,

für arme Eltern kann man nichts, aber für arme Schwiegereltern kann man was.  :-)

ich mein im bett.... denn da gehts nochmal richtig zur sache.... es könnte ja das letzte mal gewesen sein